Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘That’s bang out of order, mate!’

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

‘That’s bang out of order, mate!’: Gendered and racialized micro-practices of disadvantage and privilege in UK business schools

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

‘That’s bang out of order, mate!’: Gendered and racialized micro-practices of disadvantage and privilege in UK business schools. / Sliwa, Martyna; Gordon, Lisi; Mason, Katy et al.
In: Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.09.2024, p. 1852-1872.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sliwa M, Gordon L, Mason K, Beech N. ‘That’s bang out of order, mate!’: Gendered and racialized micro-practices of disadvantage and privilege in UK business schools. Gender, Work and Organization. 2024 Sept 1;31(5):1852-1872. Epub 2022 Oct 14. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12920

Author

Sliwa, Martyna ; Gordon, Lisi ; Mason, Katy et al. / ‘That’s bang out of order, mate!’ : Gendered and racialized micro-practices of disadvantage and privilege in UK business schools. In: Gender, Work and Organization. 2024 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 1852-1872.

Bibtex

@article{a0370db5fea14e36b855f012cef7fcdb,
title = "{\textquoteleft}That{\textquoteright}s bang out of order, mate!{\textquoteright}: Gendered and racialized micro-practices of disadvantage and privilege in UK business schools",
abstract = "The existence of gendered and racialized inequalities in academia has been well documented. To date, research has primarily addressed the intersectional disadvantages faced by members of minority groups, with much less attention paid to the privileges experienced by dominant group members. This paper draws on 21 interviews and 36 audio-diary entries completed by a diverse group of senior higher education leaders who have successfully navigated the career ladder in UK business schools. By juxtaposing minority with dominant group members{\textquoteright} narratives, the study advances intersectionality research, offering a contextualized analysis of the micro-practices of both disadvantage and privilege in academia. Through a focus on how micro-practices perform differently for members of different groups, it foregrounds {\textquoteleft}obvious{\textquoteright} as well as nuanced differences that contribute to the accumulation of disadvantage and privilege throughout an individual{\textquoteright}s career, and emphasizes simultaneity as crucial to understanding the workings of gendered and racialized disadvantage and privilege.",
keywords = "academia, disadvantage, inclusion, intersectionality, micro-practice, privilege",
author = "Martyna Sliwa and Lisi Gordon and Katy Mason and Nic Beech",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/gwao.12920",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1852--1872",
journal = "Gender, Work and Organization",
issn = "0968-6673",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘That’s bang out of order, mate!’

T2 - Gendered and racialized micro-practices of disadvantage and privilege in UK business schools

AU - Sliwa, Martyna

AU - Gordon, Lisi

AU - Mason, Katy

AU - Beech, Nic

PY - 2024/9/1

Y1 - 2024/9/1

N2 - The existence of gendered and racialized inequalities in academia has been well documented. To date, research has primarily addressed the intersectional disadvantages faced by members of minority groups, with much less attention paid to the privileges experienced by dominant group members. This paper draws on 21 interviews and 36 audio-diary entries completed by a diverse group of senior higher education leaders who have successfully navigated the career ladder in UK business schools. By juxtaposing minority with dominant group members’ narratives, the study advances intersectionality research, offering a contextualized analysis of the micro-practices of both disadvantage and privilege in academia. Through a focus on how micro-practices perform differently for members of different groups, it foregrounds ‘obvious’ as well as nuanced differences that contribute to the accumulation of disadvantage and privilege throughout an individual’s career, and emphasizes simultaneity as crucial to understanding the workings of gendered and racialized disadvantage and privilege.

AB - The existence of gendered and racialized inequalities in academia has been well documented. To date, research has primarily addressed the intersectional disadvantages faced by members of minority groups, with much less attention paid to the privileges experienced by dominant group members. This paper draws on 21 interviews and 36 audio-diary entries completed by a diverse group of senior higher education leaders who have successfully navigated the career ladder in UK business schools. By juxtaposing minority with dominant group members’ narratives, the study advances intersectionality research, offering a contextualized analysis of the micro-practices of both disadvantage and privilege in academia. Through a focus on how micro-practices perform differently for members of different groups, it foregrounds ‘obvious’ as well as nuanced differences that contribute to the accumulation of disadvantage and privilege throughout an individual’s career, and emphasizes simultaneity as crucial to understanding the workings of gendered and racialized disadvantage and privilege.

KW - academia

KW - disadvantage

KW - inclusion

KW - intersectionality

KW - micro-practice

KW - privilege

U2 - 10.1111/gwao.12920

DO - 10.1111/gwao.12920

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 1852

EP - 1872

JO - Gender, Work and Organization

JF - Gender, Work and Organization

SN - 0968-6673

IS - 5

ER -