Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The acceptability of lotteries in allocation pr...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems: a choice-based approach

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems: a choice-based approach. / Bouacida, Elias; Foucart, Renaud.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2020. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Bouacida, E & Foucart, R 2020 'The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems: a choice-based approach' Economics Working Papers Series, Lancaster University, Department of Economics, Lancaster.

APA

Bouacida, E., & Foucart, R. (2020). The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems: a choice-based approach. (Economics Working Papers Series). Lancaster University, Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Bouacida E, Foucart R. The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems: a choice-based approach. Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics. 2020 Jul 1. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Author

Bouacida, Elias ; Foucart, Renaud. / The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems : a choice-based approach. Lancaster : Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2020. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{abc42c594b704da98b2aa564f35fda45,
title = "The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems: a choice-based approach",
abstract = "We report the results of two experiments on the social acceptability of random devices in allocation mechanisms. A majority of subjects do not opt for a lottery if they can rationalize an alternative mechanism as non-random. It is, however, possible to design a payoff-equivalent mechanism to the lottery that is more acceptable. Our results shed light on the real-world reliance on obscure criteria in allocation problems where lotteries seem to be simpler and more efficient.",
keywords = "lotteries, mechanism design",
author = "Elias Bouacida and Renaud Foucart",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "1",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Papers Series",
publisher = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems

T2 - a choice-based approach

AU - Bouacida, Elias

AU - Foucart, Renaud

PY - 2020/7/1

Y1 - 2020/7/1

N2 - We report the results of two experiments on the social acceptability of random devices in allocation mechanisms. A majority of subjects do not opt for a lottery if they can rationalize an alternative mechanism as non-random. It is, however, possible to design a payoff-equivalent mechanism to the lottery that is more acceptable. Our results shed light on the real-world reliance on obscure criteria in allocation problems where lotteries seem to be simpler and more efficient.

AB - We report the results of two experiments on the social acceptability of random devices in allocation mechanisms. A majority of subjects do not opt for a lottery if they can rationalize an alternative mechanism as non-random. It is, however, possible to design a payoff-equivalent mechanism to the lottery that is more acceptable. Our results shed light on the real-world reliance on obscure criteria in allocation problems where lotteries seem to be simpler and more efficient.

KW - lotteries

KW - mechanism design

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Papers Series

BT - The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems

PB - Lancaster University, Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster

ER -