Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Advocate and Its Wealthy Client

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The Advocate and Its Wealthy Client: Britain and Switzerland in the Early Cold War

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Advocate and Its Wealthy Client: Britain and Switzerland in the Early Cold War. / Wyss, Marco.
In: The International History Review, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2013, p. 184-204.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wyss M. The Advocate and Its Wealthy Client: Britain and Switzerland in the Early Cold War. The International History Review. 2013;35(1):184-204. Epub 2012 Nov 19. doi: 10.1080/07075332.2012.737349

Author

Wyss, Marco. / The Advocate and Its Wealthy Client : Britain and Switzerland in the Early Cold War. In: The International History Review. 2013 ; Vol. 35, No. 1. pp. 184-204.

Bibtex

@article{53b3a661ed854c3795432fc6e075a80f,
title = "The Advocate and Its Wealthy Client: Britain and Switzerland in the Early Cold War",
abstract = "In the immediate post-war period and during the early cold war, Britain regularly defended Switzerland's interests against the two emerging superpowers: the Soviet Union and especially the United States. This advocacy was not, however, altruistically motivated. In light of their experiences during the Second World War, British policy-makers could still see the benefits of a neutral Switzerland. But more importantly, the relatively wealthy Swiss were willing to pay for British support and a neutral Switzerland implied other financial, political, and strategic advantages. When there were no such advantages, London abstained from defending Berne. In the case of the negotiations leading to Switzerland's informal participation in the Western strategic embargo against the Eastern Bloc, Whitehall did not stand up to defend Swiss neutrality against US might. Yet this article demonstrates that even if the British had been willing to help the Swiss in their dealings with the Americans, they would have lacked the power to prevent Washington from imposing its will. Britain's power continued to decline after the war, and advocacy for Switzerland could only be successful if the Swiss position was acceptable to the United States.",
keywords = "cold war, Switzerland, United Kingdom, neutrality, CoCom",
author = "Marco Wyss",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/07075332.2012.737349",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "184--204",
journal = "The International History Review",
issn = "1949-6540",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Advocate and Its Wealthy Client

T2 - Britain and Switzerland in the Early Cold War

AU - Wyss, Marco

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In the immediate post-war period and during the early cold war, Britain regularly defended Switzerland's interests against the two emerging superpowers: the Soviet Union and especially the United States. This advocacy was not, however, altruistically motivated. In light of their experiences during the Second World War, British policy-makers could still see the benefits of a neutral Switzerland. But more importantly, the relatively wealthy Swiss were willing to pay for British support and a neutral Switzerland implied other financial, political, and strategic advantages. When there were no such advantages, London abstained from defending Berne. In the case of the negotiations leading to Switzerland's informal participation in the Western strategic embargo against the Eastern Bloc, Whitehall did not stand up to defend Swiss neutrality against US might. Yet this article demonstrates that even if the British had been willing to help the Swiss in their dealings with the Americans, they would have lacked the power to prevent Washington from imposing its will. Britain's power continued to decline after the war, and advocacy for Switzerland could only be successful if the Swiss position was acceptable to the United States.

AB - In the immediate post-war period and during the early cold war, Britain regularly defended Switzerland's interests against the two emerging superpowers: the Soviet Union and especially the United States. This advocacy was not, however, altruistically motivated. In light of their experiences during the Second World War, British policy-makers could still see the benefits of a neutral Switzerland. But more importantly, the relatively wealthy Swiss were willing to pay for British support and a neutral Switzerland implied other financial, political, and strategic advantages. When there were no such advantages, London abstained from defending Berne. In the case of the negotiations leading to Switzerland's informal participation in the Western strategic embargo against the Eastern Bloc, Whitehall did not stand up to defend Swiss neutrality against US might. Yet this article demonstrates that even if the British had been willing to help the Swiss in their dealings with the Americans, they would have lacked the power to prevent Washington from imposing its will. Britain's power continued to decline after the war, and advocacy for Switzerland could only be successful if the Swiss position was acceptable to the United States.

KW - cold war

KW - Switzerland

KW - United Kingdom

KW - neutrality

KW - CoCom

U2 - 10.1080/07075332.2012.737349

DO - 10.1080/07075332.2012.737349

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 184

EP - 204

JO - The International History Review

JF - The International History Review

SN - 1949-6540

IS - 1

ER -