Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The age of consent and the ending of queer theory

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The age of consent and the ending of queer theory

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The age of consent and the ending of queer theory. / Beresford, Sarah.

In: Laws, Vol. 3, No. 4, 22.10.2014, p. 759-779.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Beresford, Sarah. / The age of consent and the ending of queer theory. In: Laws. 2014 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 759-779.

Bibtex

@article{ae6e0f86492142db8efb281b3ae2f9c2,
title = "The age of consent and the ending of queer theory",
abstract = "This article uses the debates surrounding the age of consent as a broad umbrella to question the continued usefulness of Queer Theory. The debates surrounding the age of consent illustrate that Queer Theory has not fulfilled its original promise and that it is not (and possibly never been), {\textquoteleft}fit for purpose{\textquoteright}. Towards the end of 2013, the topic of lowering the age of consent in England and Wales was once again much in the news. This article suggests that much of that debate focused expressly or impliedly on the age of which men and boys have sexual intercourse (whether gay or straight), rather than when people have sexual intercourse. Queer Theory (originating from feminism), was intended to be a liberating phenomenon, but contrary to these hopes and intentions, Queer Theory evolved to become synonymous with white gay men, thus denying its origins and becoming distinctly anti-feminist. Those who argue for a reduction in the age of consent have used (whether knowingly or not) an approach which is consistent with this evolved version of Queer Theory. Consequently, the debate on the age of consent has ignored, or given insufficient attention to, the effect(s) a lowering of the age of consent will have on girls and women. This article, therefore, seeks to question, disrupt and unsettle, what Queer Theory has become, suggesting that, in several significant aspects, it fails to fully acknowledge patriarchy; render (lesbian) women visible; acknowledge and accommodate the lived experiences of women.",
keywords = "Age of consent, Queer Theory, Post-Queer Theory, Feminist, Neo-feminist queer theory",
author = "Sarah Beresford",
year = "2014",
month = oct,
day = "22",
doi = "10.3390/laws3040759",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "759--779",
journal = "Laws",
issn = "2075-471X",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The age of consent and the ending of queer theory

AU - Beresford, Sarah

PY - 2014/10/22

Y1 - 2014/10/22

N2 - This article uses the debates surrounding the age of consent as a broad umbrella to question the continued usefulness of Queer Theory. The debates surrounding the age of consent illustrate that Queer Theory has not fulfilled its original promise and that it is not (and possibly never been), ‘fit for purpose’. Towards the end of 2013, the topic of lowering the age of consent in England and Wales was once again much in the news. This article suggests that much of that debate focused expressly or impliedly on the age of which men and boys have sexual intercourse (whether gay or straight), rather than when people have sexual intercourse. Queer Theory (originating from feminism), was intended to be a liberating phenomenon, but contrary to these hopes and intentions, Queer Theory evolved to become synonymous with white gay men, thus denying its origins and becoming distinctly anti-feminist. Those who argue for a reduction in the age of consent have used (whether knowingly or not) an approach which is consistent with this evolved version of Queer Theory. Consequently, the debate on the age of consent has ignored, or given insufficient attention to, the effect(s) a lowering of the age of consent will have on girls and women. This article, therefore, seeks to question, disrupt and unsettle, what Queer Theory has become, suggesting that, in several significant aspects, it fails to fully acknowledge patriarchy; render (lesbian) women visible; acknowledge and accommodate the lived experiences of women.

AB - This article uses the debates surrounding the age of consent as a broad umbrella to question the continued usefulness of Queer Theory. The debates surrounding the age of consent illustrate that Queer Theory has not fulfilled its original promise and that it is not (and possibly never been), ‘fit for purpose’. Towards the end of 2013, the topic of lowering the age of consent in England and Wales was once again much in the news. This article suggests that much of that debate focused expressly or impliedly on the age of which men and boys have sexual intercourse (whether gay or straight), rather than when people have sexual intercourse. Queer Theory (originating from feminism), was intended to be a liberating phenomenon, but contrary to these hopes and intentions, Queer Theory evolved to become synonymous with white gay men, thus denying its origins and becoming distinctly anti-feminist. Those who argue for a reduction in the age of consent have used (whether knowingly or not) an approach which is consistent with this evolved version of Queer Theory. Consequently, the debate on the age of consent has ignored, or given insufficient attention to, the effect(s) a lowering of the age of consent will have on girls and women. This article, therefore, seeks to question, disrupt and unsettle, what Queer Theory has become, suggesting that, in several significant aspects, it fails to fully acknowledge patriarchy; render (lesbian) women visible; acknowledge and accommodate the lived experiences of women.

KW - Age of consent

KW - Queer Theory

KW - Post-Queer Theory

KW - Feminist

KW - Neo-feminist queer theory

U2 - 10.3390/laws3040759

DO - 10.3390/laws3040759

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 759

EP - 779

JO - Laws

JF - Laws

SN - 2075-471X

IS - 4

ER -