Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The "Be All and End All"?
T2 - Young People, Online Sexual Health Information, Science and Skepticism
AU - Farrugia, Adrian
AU - Waling, Andrea
AU - Pienaar, Kiran
AU - Fraser, Suzanne
PY - 2021/9/30
Y1 - 2021/9/30
N2 - In this article, we investigate young people's trust in online sexual health resources. Analyzing interviews with 37 young people in Australia using Irwin and Michael's account of science-society relations and Warner's conceptualization of "publics," we explore the processes by which they assess the credibility of online sexual health information. We suggest that when seeking medical information, young people opt for traditionally authoritative online sources that purport to offer "facts." By contrast, when seeking information about relationships or sexual practices, participants indicated a preference for websites presenting "experiences" rather than or as well as "facts." Regardless of content, however, our participants approached online sexual health information skeptically and used various techniques to appraise its quality and trustworthiness. We argue that these young people are productively understood as a skeptical public of sexual health. We conclude by exploring the implications of our analysis for the provision of online sexual health information.
AB - In this article, we investigate young people's trust in online sexual health resources. Analyzing interviews with 37 young people in Australia using Irwin and Michael's account of science-society relations and Warner's conceptualization of "publics," we explore the processes by which they assess the credibility of online sexual health information. We suggest that when seeking medical information, young people opt for traditionally authoritative online sources that purport to offer "facts." By contrast, when seeking information about relationships or sexual practices, participants indicated a preference for websites presenting "experiences" rather than or as well as "facts." Regardless of content, however, our participants approached online sexual health information skeptically and used various techniques to appraise its quality and trustworthiness. We argue that these young people are productively understood as a skeptical public of sexual health. We conclude by exploring the implications of our analysis for the provision of online sexual health information.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Australia
KW - Humans
KW - Internet
KW - Sexual Behavior
KW - Sexual Health
KW - Trust
U2 - 10.1177/10497323211003543
DO - 10.1177/10497323211003543
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33880977
VL - 31
SP - 2097
EP - 2110
JO - Qualitative Health Research
JF - Qualitative Health Research
SN - 1049-7323
IS - 11
ER -