Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The "Be All and End All"?

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The "Be All and End All"?: Young People, Online Sexual Health Information, Science and Skepticism

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The "Be All and End All"? Young People, Online Sexual Health Information, Science and Skepticism. / Farrugia, Adrian; Waling, Andrea; Pienaar, Kiran et al.
In: Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 31, No. 11, 30.09.2021, p. 2097-2110.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Farrugia, A, Waling, A, Pienaar, K & Fraser, S 2021, 'The "Be All and End All"? Young People, Online Sexual Health Information, Science and Skepticism', Qualitative Health Research, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2097-2110. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211003543

APA

Vancouver

Farrugia A, Waling A, Pienaar K, Fraser S. The "Be All and End All"? Young People, Online Sexual Health Information, Science and Skepticism. Qualitative Health Research. 2021 Sept 30;31(11):2097-2110. Epub 2021 Apr 21. doi: 10.1177/10497323211003543

Author

Farrugia, Adrian ; Waling, Andrea ; Pienaar, Kiran et al. / The "Be All and End All"? Young People, Online Sexual Health Information, Science and Skepticism. In: Qualitative Health Research. 2021 ; Vol. 31, No. 11. pp. 2097-2110.

Bibtex

@article{c6971f3fc2294bd9b868fe35b3916bfe,
title = "The {"}Be All and End All{"}?: Young People, Online Sexual Health Information, Science and Skepticism",
abstract = "In this article, we investigate young people's trust in online sexual health resources. Analyzing interviews with 37 young people in Australia using Irwin and Michael's account of science-society relations and Warner's conceptualization of {"}publics,{"} we explore the processes by which they assess the credibility of online sexual health information. We suggest that when seeking medical information, young people opt for traditionally authoritative online sources that purport to offer {"}facts.{"} By contrast, when seeking information about relationships or sexual practices, participants indicated a preference for websites presenting {"}experiences{"} rather than or as well as {"}facts.{"} Regardless of content, however, our participants approached online sexual health information skeptically and used various techniques to appraise its quality and trustworthiness. We argue that these young people are productively understood as a skeptical public of sexual health. We conclude by exploring the implications of our analysis for the provision of online sexual health information.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Australia, Humans, Internet, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Health, Trust",
author = "Adrian Farrugia and Andrea Waling and Kiran Pienaar and Suzanne Fraser",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1177/10497323211003543",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "2097--2110",
journal = "Qualitative Health Research",
issn = "1049-7323",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The "Be All and End All"?

T2 - Young People, Online Sexual Health Information, Science and Skepticism

AU - Farrugia, Adrian

AU - Waling, Andrea

AU - Pienaar, Kiran

AU - Fraser, Suzanne

PY - 2021/9/30

Y1 - 2021/9/30

N2 - In this article, we investigate young people's trust in online sexual health resources. Analyzing interviews with 37 young people in Australia using Irwin and Michael's account of science-society relations and Warner's conceptualization of "publics," we explore the processes by which they assess the credibility of online sexual health information. We suggest that when seeking medical information, young people opt for traditionally authoritative online sources that purport to offer "facts." By contrast, when seeking information about relationships or sexual practices, participants indicated a preference for websites presenting "experiences" rather than or as well as "facts." Regardless of content, however, our participants approached online sexual health information skeptically and used various techniques to appraise its quality and trustworthiness. We argue that these young people are productively understood as a skeptical public of sexual health. We conclude by exploring the implications of our analysis for the provision of online sexual health information.

AB - In this article, we investigate young people's trust in online sexual health resources. Analyzing interviews with 37 young people in Australia using Irwin and Michael's account of science-society relations and Warner's conceptualization of "publics," we explore the processes by which they assess the credibility of online sexual health information. We suggest that when seeking medical information, young people opt for traditionally authoritative online sources that purport to offer "facts." By contrast, when seeking information about relationships or sexual practices, participants indicated a preference for websites presenting "experiences" rather than or as well as "facts." Regardless of content, however, our participants approached online sexual health information skeptically and used various techniques to appraise its quality and trustworthiness. We argue that these young people are productively understood as a skeptical public of sexual health. We conclude by exploring the implications of our analysis for the provision of online sexual health information.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Australia

KW - Humans

KW - Internet

KW - Sexual Behavior

KW - Sexual Health

KW - Trust

U2 - 10.1177/10497323211003543

DO - 10.1177/10497323211003543

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33880977

VL - 31

SP - 2097

EP - 2110

JO - Qualitative Health Research

JF - Qualitative Health Research

SN - 1049-7323

IS - 11

ER -