Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The British Accounting Review review process
View graph of relations

The British Accounting Review review process: evidence from 1997-2006

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The British Accounting Review review process : evidence from 1997-2006. / Beattie, Vivien; Emmanuel, Clive.

In: British Accounting Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 09.2008, p. 199-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Beattie, V & Emmanuel, C 2008, 'The British Accounting Review review process: evidence from 1997-2006', British Accounting Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.004

APA

Vancouver

Author

Beattie, Vivien ; Emmanuel, Clive. / The British Accounting Review review process : evidence from 1997-2006. In: British Accounting Review. 2008 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 199-206.

Bibtex

@article{9c7e51ae37894336a77165f91a142db6,
title = "The British Accounting Review review process: evidence from 1997-2006",
abstract = "This is the first part of a two-part analysis of submissions to The British Accounting Review (BAR) over the decade spanning 1997–2006. In this part, we outline the journal review process, report on selected characteristics (country of origin, number of authors) of 657 submitted papers and report on the review process outcomes of these papers (including turnaround times). In part two of this analysis, we will investigate the characteristics of these papers that give insights into the way in which accounting and finance knowledge has developed over the decade (in particular, the topic area and methods of analysis used).",
author = "Vivien Beattie and Clive Emmanuel",
note = "This is an extended editorial.",
year = "2008",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.004",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "199--206",
journal = "British Accounting Review",
issn = "0890-8389",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The British Accounting Review review process

T2 - evidence from 1997-2006

AU - Beattie, Vivien

AU - Emmanuel, Clive

N1 - This is an extended editorial.

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - This is the first part of a two-part analysis of submissions to The British Accounting Review (BAR) over the decade spanning 1997–2006. In this part, we outline the journal review process, report on selected characteristics (country of origin, number of authors) of 657 submitted papers and report on the review process outcomes of these papers (including turnaround times). In part two of this analysis, we will investigate the characteristics of these papers that give insights into the way in which accounting and finance knowledge has developed over the decade (in particular, the topic area and methods of analysis used).

AB - This is the first part of a two-part analysis of submissions to The British Accounting Review (BAR) over the decade spanning 1997–2006. In this part, we outline the journal review process, report on selected characteristics (country of origin, number of authors) of 657 submitted papers and report on the review process outcomes of these papers (including turnaround times). In part two of this analysis, we will investigate the characteristics of these papers that give insights into the way in which accounting and finance knowledge has developed over the decade (in particular, the topic area and methods of analysis used).

U2 - 10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.004

DO - 10.1016/j.bar.2008.06.004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 199

EP - 206

JO - British Accounting Review

JF - British Accounting Review

SN - 0890-8389

IS - 3

ER -