Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The causation of disease - the practical and et...
View graph of relations

The causation of disease - the practical and ethical consequences of competing explanations.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The causation of disease - the practical and ethical consequences of competing explanations. / Räisänen, Ulla; Bekkers, Marie-Jet; Boddington, Paula et al.
In: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Vol. 9, No. 3, 04.2006, p. 293-306.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Räisänen, U, Bekkers, M-J, Boddington, P, Sarangi, S & Clarke, A 2006, 'The causation of disease - the practical and ethical consequences of competing explanations.', Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-9007-5

APA

Räisänen, U., Bekkers, M-J., Boddington, P., Sarangi, S., & Clarke, A. (2006). The causation of disease - the practical and ethical consequences of competing explanations. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 9(3), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-006-9007-5

Vancouver

Räisänen U, Bekkers M-J, Boddington P, Sarangi S, Clarke A. The causation of disease - the practical and ethical consequences of competing explanations. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2006 Apr;9(3):293-306. doi: 10.1007/s11019-006-9007-5

Author

Räisänen, Ulla ; Bekkers, Marie-Jet ; Boddington, Paula et al. / The causation of disease - the practical and ethical consequences of competing explanations. In: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2006 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 293-306.

Bibtex

@article{38fc91093e334884856b49f6afd53e1b,
title = "The causation of disease - the practical and ethical consequences of competing explanations.",
abstract = "The prevention, treatment and management of disease are closely linked to how the causes of a particular disease are explained. For multi-factorial conditions, the causal explanations are inevitably complex and competing models may exist to explain the same condition. Selecting one particular causal explanation over another will carry practical and ethical consequences that are acutely relevant for health policy. In this paper our focus is two-fold; (i) the different models of causal explanation that are put forward within current scientific literature for the high and rising prevalence of the common complex conditions of coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D); and (ii) how these explanations are taken up (or not) within national health policy guidelines. We examine the causal explanations for these two conditions through a systematic database search of current scientific literature. By identifying different causal explanations we propose a three-tier taxonomy of the most prominent models of explanations: (i) evolutionary, (ii) lifecourse, and (iii) lifestyle and environment. We elaborate this taxonomy with a micro-level thematic analysis to illustrate how some explanations are semantically and rhetorically foregrounded over others. We then investigate the uptake of the scientific causal explanations in health policy documents with regard to the prevention and management recommendations of current National Service Frameworks for CAD and T2D. Our findings indicate a lack of congruence between the complexity and frequent overlap of causal explanations evident in the scientific literature and the predominant focus on lifestyle recommendations found in the mainstream health policy documents.",
keywords = "causal explanations - common complex disorders - coronary artery disease - ethics - health policy - thematic and textual analysis - type 2 diabetes",
author = "Ulla R{\"a}is{\"a}nen and Marie-Jet Bekkers and Paula Boddington and Srikant Sarangi and Angus Clarke",
year = "2006",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s11019-006-9007-5",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "293--306",
journal = "Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy",
issn = "1386-7423",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The causation of disease - the practical and ethical consequences of competing explanations.

AU - Räisänen, Ulla

AU - Bekkers, Marie-Jet

AU - Boddington, Paula

AU - Sarangi, Srikant

AU - Clarke, Angus

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - The prevention, treatment and management of disease are closely linked to how the causes of a particular disease are explained. For multi-factorial conditions, the causal explanations are inevitably complex and competing models may exist to explain the same condition. Selecting one particular causal explanation over another will carry practical and ethical consequences that are acutely relevant for health policy. In this paper our focus is two-fold; (i) the different models of causal explanation that are put forward within current scientific literature for the high and rising prevalence of the common complex conditions of coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D); and (ii) how these explanations are taken up (or not) within national health policy guidelines. We examine the causal explanations for these two conditions through a systematic database search of current scientific literature. By identifying different causal explanations we propose a three-tier taxonomy of the most prominent models of explanations: (i) evolutionary, (ii) lifecourse, and (iii) lifestyle and environment. We elaborate this taxonomy with a micro-level thematic analysis to illustrate how some explanations are semantically and rhetorically foregrounded over others. We then investigate the uptake of the scientific causal explanations in health policy documents with regard to the prevention and management recommendations of current National Service Frameworks for CAD and T2D. Our findings indicate a lack of congruence between the complexity and frequent overlap of causal explanations evident in the scientific literature and the predominant focus on lifestyle recommendations found in the mainstream health policy documents.

AB - The prevention, treatment and management of disease are closely linked to how the causes of a particular disease are explained. For multi-factorial conditions, the causal explanations are inevitably complex and competing models may exist to explain the same condition. Selecting one particular causal explanation over another will carry practical and ethical consequences that are acutely relevant for health policy. In this paper our focus is two-fold; (i) the different models of causal explanation that are put forward within current scientific literature for the high and rising prevalence of the common complex conditions of coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D); and (ii) how these explanations are taken up (or not) within national health policy guidelines. We examine the causal explanations for these two conditions through a systematic database search of current scientific literature. By identifying different causal explanations we propose a three-tier taxonomy of the most prominent models of explanations: (i) evolutionary, (ii) lifecourse, and (iii) lifestyle and environment. We elaborate this taxonomy with a micro-level thematic analysis to illustrate how some explanations are semantically and rhetorically foregrounded over others. We then investigate the uptake of the scientific causal explanations in health policy documents with regard to the prevention and management recommendations of current National Service Frameworks for CAD and T2D. Our findings indicate a lack of congruence between the complexity and frequent overlap of causal explanations evident in the scientific literature and the predominant focus on lifestyle recommendations found in the mainstream health policy documents.

KW - causal explanations - common complex disorders - coronary artery disease - ethics - health policy - thematic and textual analysis - type 2 diabetes

U2 - 10.1007/s11019-006-9007-5

DO - 10.1007/s11019-006-9007-5

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 293

EP - 306

JO - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

JF - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

SN - 1386-7423

IS - 3

ER -