Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The complete carbon budget of a drained peat ca...
View graph of relations

The complete carbon budget of a drained peat catchment

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The complete carbon budget of a drained peat catchment. / Rowson, J. G.; Gibson, H. S.; Worrall, F. et al.
In: Soil Use and Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.09.2010, p. 261-273.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Rowson, JG, Gibson, HS, Worrall, F, Ostle, N, Burt, TP & Adamson, JK 2010, 'The complete carbon budget of a drained peat catchment', Soil Use and Management, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00274.x

APA

Rowson, J. G., Gibson, H. S., Worrall, F., Ostle, N., Burt, T. P., & Adamson, J. K. (2010). The complete carbon budget of a drained peat catchment. Soil Use and Management, 26(3), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00274.x

Vancouver

Rowson JG, Gibson HS, Worrall F, Ostle N, Burt TP, Adamson JK. The complete carbon budget of a drained peat catchment. Soil Use and Management. 2010 Sept 1;26(3):261-273. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00274.x

Author

Rowson, J. G. ; Gibson, H. S. ; Worrall, F. et al. / The complete carbon budget of a drained peat catchment. In: Soil Use and Management. 2010 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 261-273.

Bibtex

@article{bd4dff27698d45f1becf0e542f25f082,
title = "The complete carbon budget of a drained peat catchment",
abstract = "This study measures the complete carbon budget of a drained peat-covered catchment. It includes dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), dissolved CO2, primary pro-ductivity, soil respiration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) in contrast to other studies which have focused on only some of the possible carbon uptake and release pathways; values for rainfall inputs were taken from a nearby catchment. The study is based on data collected over 2 yr for two drain catchments within one site and the main findings are:1. The catchments were a net source of all forms of carbon at between +63.8 and +106.8 Mg C/km2/yr;2. There was a net loss of between +9.3 and +40.7 Mg C/km2/yr in terms of exchange of carbon with the atmosphere;3. The small size of the study catchments seems to have resulted in higher values of exported DOC than recorded elsewhere and the highly disturbed drainage of the site may have given rise to losses in net ecosystem exchange (NEE).If the fate of the peatland carbon store is to be understood, then it is important that all carbon uptake and release pathways are considered and not just components of the carbon cycle.",
keywords = "Budgets, Carbon, Drainage, Peat",
author = "Rowson, {J. G.} and Gibson, {H. S.} and F. Worrall and N. Ostle and Burt, {T. P.} and Adamson, {J. K.}",
year = "2010",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00274.x",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "261--273",
journal = "Soil Use and Management",
issn = "0266-0032",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The complete carbon budget of a drained peat catchment

AU - Rowson, J. G.

AU - Gibson, H. S.

AU - Worrall, F.

AU - Ostle, N.

AU - Burt, T. P.

AU - Adamson, J. K.

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - This study measures the complete carbon budget of a drained peat-covered catchment. It includes dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), dissolved CO2, primary pro-ductivity, soil respiration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) in contrast to other studies which have focused on only some of the possible carbon uptake and release pathways; values for rainfall inputs were taken from a nearby catchment. The study is based on data collected over 2 yr for two drain catchments within one site and the main findings are:1. The catchments were a net source of all forms of carbon at between +63.8 and +106.8 Mg C/km2/yr;2. There was a net loss of between +9.3 and +40.7 Mg C/km2/yr in terms of exchange of carbon with the atmosphere;3. The small size of the study catchments seems to have resulted in higher values of exported DOC than recorded elsewhere and the highly disturbed drainage of the site may have given rise to losses in net ecosystem exchange (NEE).If the fate of the peatland carbon store is to be understood, then it is important that all carbon uptake and release pathways are considered and not just components of the carbon cycle.

AB - This study measures the complete carbon budget of a drained peat-covered catchment. It includes dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), dissolved CO2, primary pro-ductivity, soil respiration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) in contrast to other studies which have focused on only some of the possible carbon uptake and release pathways; values for rainfall inputs were taken from a nearby catchment. The study is based on data collected over 2 yr for two drain catchments within one site and the main findings are:1. The catchments were a net source of all forms of carbon at between +63.8 and +106.8 Mg C/km2/yr;2. There was a net loss of between +9.3 and +40.7 Mg C/km2/yr in terms of exchange of carbon with the atmosphere;3. The small size of the study catchments seems to have resulted in higher values of exported DOC than recorded elsewhere and the highly disturbed drainage of the site may have given rise to losses in net ecosystem exchange (NEE).If the fate of the peatland carbon store is to be understood, then it is important that all carbon uptake and release pathways are considered and not just components of the carbon cycle.

KW - Budgets

KW - Carbon

KW - Drainage

KW - Peat

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00274.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00274.x

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:77956107310

VL - 26

SP - 261

EP - 273

JO - Soil Use and Management

JF - Soil Use and Management

SN - 0266-0032

IS - 3

ER -