Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The conflict in the Indian Northeast
View graph of relations

The conflict in the Indian Northeast

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The conflict in the Indian Northeast. / Mukherjee, Kunal.
In: Defence Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2014, p. 111-133.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Mukherjee K. The conflict in the Indian Northeast. Defence Studies. 2014;14(2):111-133. doi: 10.1080/14702436.2014.899744

Author

Mukherjee, Kunal. / The conflict in the Indian Northeast. In: Defence Studies. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 111-133.

Bibtex

@article{35d7669eba654727bab91244c162720e,
title = "The conflict in the Indian Northeast",
abstract = "This paper looks at the conflict in the Indian northeast and revolves primarily around the different levels of conflict. The Indian northeast is most certainly one of the most under- researched conflict zones in academia. This paper uses Mary Kaldor{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}New War{\textquoteright} thesis as a theoretical framework to understand the situation, and pays special attention to its very complex and multifaceted nature. The paper argues that the levels of violence differ from one state to another in a region which has always had complicated relations with the rest of India since 1947. Poverty, corruption, administrative failure, police brutality, identity politics, human rights abuses and the role played by external actors such as China and Burma in the region are some of the key features associated with this conflict. There is a special focus on Nagaland since the Naga conflict is the oldest of all the conflicts in the region. The rest of the paper looks at some of the other states of the Indian northeast which include Assam, Manipur and Tripura and take them up collectively for discussion. Finally, after making an assessment of the entire region, the paper tries to suggest methods of peaceful building and conflict management as the way forward.",
author = "Kunal Mukherjee",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/14702436.2014.899744",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "111--133",
journal = "Defence Studies",
issn = "1743-9698",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The conflict in the Indian Northeast

AU - Mukherjee, Kunal

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper looks at the conflict in the Indian northeast and revolves primarily around the different levels of conflict. The Indian northeast is most certainly one of the most under- researched conflict zones in academia. This paper uses Mary Kaldor’s ‘New War’ thesis as a theoretical framework to understand the situation, and pays special attention to its very complex and multifaceted nature. The paper argues that the levels of violence differ from one state to another in a region which has always had complicated relations with the rest of India since 1947. Poverty, corruption, administrative failure, police brutality, identity politics, human rights abuses and the role played by external actors such as China and Burma in the region are some of the key features associated with this conflict. There is a special focus on Nagaland since the Naga conflict is the oldest of all the conflicts in the region. The rest of the paper looks at some of the other states of the Indian northeast which include Assam, Manipur and Tripura and take them up collectively for discussion. Finally, after making an assessment of the entire region, the paper tries to suggest methods of peaceful building and conflict management as the way forward.

AB - This paper looks at the conflict in the Indian northeast and revolves primarily around the different levels of conflict. The Indian northeast is most certainly one of the most under- researched conflict zones in academia. This paper uses Mary Kaldor’s ‘New War’ thesis as a theoretical framework to understand the situation, and pays special attention to its very complex and multifaceted nature. The paper argues that the levels of violence differ from one state to another in a region which has always had complicated relations with the rest of India since 1947. Poverty, corruption, administrative failure, police brutality, identity politics, human rights abuses and the role played by external actors such as China and Burma in the region are some of the key features associated with this conflict. There is a special focus on Nagaland since the Naga conflict is the oldest of all the conflicts in the region. The rest of the paper looks at some of the other states of the Indian northeast which include Assam, Manipur and Tripura and take them up collectively for discussion. Finally, after making an assessment of the entire region, the paper tries to suggest methods of peaceful building and conflict management as the way forward.

U2 - 10.1080/14702436.2014.899744

DO - 10.1080/14702436.2014.899744

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 111

EP - 133

JO - Defence Studies

JF - Defence Studies

SN - 1743-9698

IS - 2

ER -