Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The contribution of sectoral climate change mit...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The contribution of sectoral climate change mitigation options to national targets: a quantitative assessment of dairy production in Kenya

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The contribution of sectoral climate change mitigation options to national targets: a quantitative assessment of dairy production in Kenya. / Brandt, Patric; Herold, Martin; Rufino, Mariana C.
In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, No. 3, 034016, 23.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Brandt P, Herold M, Rufino MC. The contribution of sectoral climate change mitigation options to national targets: a quantitative assessment of dairy production in Kenya. Environmental Research Letters. 2018 Feb 23;13(3):034016. Epub 2018 Feb 2. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaac84

Author

Bibtex

@article{a930e0dc9662409191750a5fcdd6ba45,
title = "The contribution of sectoral climate change mitigation options to national targets: a quantitative assessment of dairy production in Kenya",
abstract = "Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture has become a critical target in national climate change policies. More than 80% of the countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) refer to the reduction of agricultural emissions, including livestock, in their nationally determined contribution (NDC) to mitigate climate change. The livestock sector in Kenya contributes largely to the gross domestic product and to GHG emissions from the land use sector. The government has recently pledged in its NDC to curb total GHG emissions by 30% by 2030. Quantifying and linking the mitigation potential of farm practices to national targets is required to support realistically the implementation of NDCs. Improvements in feed and manure management represent promising mitigation options for dairy production. This study aimed (i) to assessmitigation and food production benefits of feed and manure management scenarios, including land use changes covering Kenya's entire dairy production region and (ii) to analyse the contribution of these practices to national targets on milk production and mitigation, and their biophysical feasibility given the availability of arable land. The results indicate that improving forage quality by increasing the use of Napier grass and supplementing dairy concentrates supports Kenya's NDC target, reduces emission intensities by 26%-31%, partially achieves the national milk productivity target for 2030 by 38%-41%, and shows high feasibility given the availability of arable land. Covering manure heaps may reduce emissions from manure management by 68%. In contrast, including maize silage in cattle diets would not reduce emission intensities due to the risk of ten-fold higher emissions from the conversion of land required to grow additional maize. The shortage of arable land may render the implementation of these improved feed practices largely infeasible. This assessment provides the first quantitative estimates of the potential of feed intensification and manure management to mitigate GHG emissions and to increase milk yields at sectoral-level and at a high spatial resolution for an SSA country. The scientific evidence is tailored to support actual policy and decision-making processes at the national level, such as 'Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions'. Linking feed intensification and manure management strategies with spatially-explicit estimates of mitigation and food production to national targets may help the sector to access climate financing while contributing to food security.",
keywords = "feed intensification, GHG emissions, land use change, livestock production, livSim, manure management, mitigation planning, NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS, SMALLHOLDER FARMING SYSTEMS, GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION, SPECIAL TOPICS-MITIGATION, ENTERIC METHANE PRODUCTION, RUMEN FERMENTATION, LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS, MILK-PRODUCTION, FOOD SECURITY, MANAGEMENT",
author = "Patric Brandt and Martin Herold and Rufino, {Mariana C.}",
year = "2018",
month = feb,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1088/1748-9326/aaac84",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Environmental Research Letters",
issn = "1748-9326",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The contribution of sectoral climate change mitigation options to national targets

T2 - a quantitative assessment of dairy production in Kenya

AU - Brandt, Patric

AU - Herold, Martin

AU - Rufino, Mariana C.

PY - 2018/2/23

Y1 - 2018/2/23

N2 - Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture has become a critical target in national climate change policies. More than 80% of the countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) refer to the reduction of agricultural emissions, including livestock, in their nationally determined contribution (NDC) to mitigate climate change. The livestock sector in Kenya contributes largely to the gross domestic product and to GHG emissions from the land use sector. The government has recently pledged in its NDC to curb total GHG emissions by 30% by 2030. Quantifying and linking the mitigation potential of farm practices to national targets is required to support realistically the implementation of NDCs. Improvements in feed and manure management represent promising mitigation options for dairy production. This study aimed (i) to assessmitigation and food production benefits of feed and manure management scenarios, including land use changes covering Kenya's entire dairy production region and (ii) to analyse the contribution of these practices to national targets on milk production and mitigation, and their biophysical feasibility given the availability of arable land. The results indicate that improving forage quality by increasing the use of Napier grass and supplementing dairy concentrates supports Kenya's NDC target, reduces emission intensities by 26%-31%, partially achieves the national milk productivity target for 2030 by 38%-41%, and shows high feasibility given the availability of arable land. Covering manure heaps may reduce emissions from manure management by 68%. In contrast, including maize silage in cattle diets would not reduce emission intensities due to the risk of ten-fold higher emissions from the conversion of land required to grow additional maize. The shortage of arable land may render the implementation of these improved feed practices largely infeasible. This assessment provides the first quantitative estimates of the potential of feed intensification and manure management to mitigate GHG emissions and to increase milk yields at sectoral-level and at a high spatial resolution for an SSA country. The scientific evidence is tailored to support actual policy and decision-making processes at the national level, such as 'Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions'. Linking feed intensification and manure management strategies with spatially-explicit estimates of mitigation and food production to national targets may help the sector to access climate financing while contributing to food security.

AB - Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture has become a critical target in national climate change policies. More than 80% of the countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) refer to the reduction of agricultural emissions, including livestock, in their nationally determined contribution (NDC) to mitigate climate change. The livestock sector in Kenya contributes largely to the gross domestic product and to GHG emissions from the land use sector. The government has recently pledged in its NDC to curb total GHG emissions by 30% by 2030. Quantifying and linking the mitigation potential of farm practices to national targets is required to support realistically the implementation of NDCs. Improvements in feed and manure management represent promising mitigation options for dairy production. This study aimed (i) to assessmitigation and food production benefits of feed and manure management scenarios, including land use changes covering Kenya's entire dairy production region and (ii) to analyse the contribution of these practices to national targets on milk production and mitigation, and their biophysical feasibility given the availability of arable land. The results indicate that improving forage quality by increasing the use of Napier grass and supplementing dairy concentrates supports Kenya's NDC target, reduces emission intensities by 26%-31%, partially achieves the national milk productivity target for 2030 by 38%-41%, and shows high feasibility given the availability of arable land. Covering manure heaps may reduce emissions from manure management by 68%. In contrast, including maize silage in cattle diets would not reduce emission intensities due to the risk of ten-fold higher emissions from the conversion of land required to grow additional maize. The shortage of arable land may render the implementation of these improved feed practices largely infeasible. This assessment provides the first quantitative estimates of the potential of feed intensification and manure management to mitigate GHG emissions and to increase milk yields at sectoral-level and at a high spatial resolution for an SSA country. The scientific evidence is tailored to support actual policy and decision-making processes at the national level, such as 'Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions'. Linking feed intensification and manure management strategies with spatially-explicit estimates of mitigation and food production to national targets may help the sector to access climate financing while contributing to food security.

KW - feed intensification

KW - GHG emissions

KW - land use change

KW - livestock production

KW - livSim

KW - manure management

KW - mitigation planning

KW - NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS

KW - SMALLHOLDER FARMING SYSTEMS

KW - GREENHOUSE-GAS MITIGATION

KW - SPECIAL TOPICS-MITIGATION

KW - ENTERIC METHANE PRODUCTION

KW - RUMEN FERMENTATION

KW - LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS

KW - MILK-PRODUCTION

KW - FOOD SECURITY

KW - MANAGEMENT

U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/aaac84

DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/aaac84

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

JO - Environmental Research Letters

JF - Environmental Research Letters

SN - 1748-9326

IS - 3

M1 - 034016

ER -