Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The 'demented other' or simply 'a person'? Exte...
View graph of relations

The 'demented other' or simply 'a person'? Extending the philosophical discourse of Naue and Kroll through the situated self

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The 'demented other' or simply 'a person'? Extending the philosophical discourse of Naue and Kroll through the situated self. / Sabat, Steven R.; Johnson, Ann; Swarbrick, Caroline et al.
In: Nursing Philosophy, Vol. 12, No. 4, 10.2011, p. 282-292.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sabat SR, Johnson A, Swarbrick C, Keady J. The 'demented other' or simply 'a person'? Extending the philosophical discourse of Naue and Kroll through the situated self. Nursing Philosophy. 2011 Oct;12(4):282-292. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2011.00485.x

Author

Sabat, Steven R. ; Johnson, Ann ; Swarbrick, Caroline et al. / The 'demented other' or simply 'a person'? Extending the philosophical discourse of Naue and Kroll through the situated self. In: Nursing Philosophy. 2011 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 282-292.

Bibtex

@article{1445cee0c3fa4ac0bc224cb72c7693fe,
title = "The 'demented other' or simply 'a person'? Extending the philosophical discourse of Naue and Kroll through the situated self",
abstract = "This article presents a critique of an article previously featured in Nursing Philosophy (10: 26-33) by Ursula Naue and Thilo Kroll, who suggested that people living with dementia are assigned a negative status upon receipt of a diagnosis, holding the identity of the 'demented other'. Specifically, in this critique, we suggest that unwitting use of the adjective 'demented' to define a person living with the condition is ill-informed and runs a risk of defining people through negative (self-)attributes, which has a deleterious impact upon that person's social and relational personae. Moreover, use of the locution 'demented' reinforces a divide between the 'demented' (them) and the 'healthy others' (us). Social constructionist theory, malignant positioning and viewing people with dementia as semiotic subjects are the philosophical pillars through which we construct the main arguments of the critique. The article concludes with the voice of one of the authors, a younger person with dementia, asking for language in dementia care to be carefully reconsidered and reframed and for the recognition of the diagnosed person's agency in the conduct of their day-to-day lives. {\textcopyright} 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
keywords = "Demented, Dementia, Lived experience, Person-centred, Self, Social positioning",
author = "Sabat, {Steven R.} and Ann Johnson and Caroline Swarbrick and John Keady",
year = "2011",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1111/j.1466-769X.2011.00485.x",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "282--292",
journal = "Nursing Philosophy",
issn = "1466-7681",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 'demented other' or simply 'a person'? Extending the philosophical discourse of Naue and Kroll through the situated self

AU - Sabat, Steven R.

AU - Johnson, Ann

AU - Swarbrick, Caroline

AU - Keady, John

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - This article presents a critique of an article previously featured in Nursing Philosophy (10: 26-33) by Ursula Naue and Thilo Kroll, who suggested that people living with dementia are assigned a negative status upon receipt of a diagnosis, holding the identity of the 'demented other'. Specifically, in this critique, we suggest that unwitting use of the adjective 'demented' to define a person living with the condition is ill-informed and runs a risk of defining people through negative (self-)attributes, which has a deleterious impact upon that person's social and relational personae. Moreover, use of the locution 'demented' reinforces a divide between the 'demented' (them) and the 'healthy others' (us). Social constructionist theory, malignant positioning and viewing people with dementia as semiotic subjects are the philosophical pillars through which we construct the main arguments of the critique. The article concludes with the voice of one of the authors, a younger person with dementia, asking for language in dementia care to be carefully reconsidered and reframed and for the recognition of the diagnosed person's agency in the conduct of their day-to-day lives. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

AB - This article presents a critique of an article previously featured in Nursing Philosophy (10: 26-33) by Ursula Naue and Thilo Kroll, who suggested that people living with dementia are assigned a negative status upon receipt of a diagnosis, holding the identity of the 'demented other'. Specifically, in this critique, we suggest that unwitting use of the adjective 'demented' to define a person living with the condition is ill-informed and runs a risk of defining people through negative (self-)attributes, which has a deleterious impact upon that person's social and relational personae. Moreover, use of the locution 'demented' reinforces a divide between the 'demented' (them) and the 'healthy others' (us). Social constructionist theory, malignant positioning and viewing people with dementia as semiotic subjects are the philosophical pillars through which we construct the main arguments of the critique. The article concludes with the voice of one of the authors, a younger person with dementia, asking for language in dementia care to be carefully reconsidered and reframed and for the recognition of the diagnosed person's agency in the conduct of their day-to-day lives. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

KW - Demented

KW - Dementia

KW - Lived experience

KW - Person-centred

KW - Self

KW - Social positioning

U2 - 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2011.00485.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2011.00485.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 282

EP - 292

JO - Nursing Philosophy

JF - Nursing Philosophy

SN - 1466-7681

IS - 4

ER -