Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The dichotomy of distributed and centralized co...

Electronic data

  • Dichotomy_of_Distributed_and_Centralised_Control_Metro_Haul_v2

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Optical Switching and Networking. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Optical Switching and Networking, 33, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.osn.2018.11.002

    Accepted author manuscript, 274 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The dichotomy of distributed and centralized control: METRO-HAUL, when control planes collide for 5G networks

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Daniel Edward King
  • Adrian Farrel
  • Emiko Nishida King
  • Ramon Casellas
  • Luis Velasco
  • R. Nejabati
  • Andrew Lord
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/07/2019
<mark>Journal</mark>Optical Switching and Networking
Volume33
Number of pages7
Pages (from-to)49-55
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date12/11/18
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Automating the provisioning of 5G services, deployed over a heterogeneous infrastructure (in terms of domains, technologies, and management platforms), remains a complex task, yet driven by the constant need to provide end-to-end connections at network slices at reducing costs and service deployment time. At the same time, such services are increasingly conceived around interconnected functions and require allocation of computing, storage, and networking resources.

The METRO-HAUL 5G research initiative acknowledges the need for automation and strives to develop an orchestration platform for services and resources that extends, integrates, and builds on top of existing approaches, macroscopically adopting Transport Software Defined Networking principles, and leveraging the programmability and open control of Transport SDN.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Optical Switching and Networking. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Optical Switching and Networking, 33, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.osn.2018.11.002