Accepted author manuscript, 633 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The dimensionality of morphological awareness
T2 - Evidence from Hong Kong Chinese-English bilingual children
AU - Li, Ran
AU - Cain, Kate
AU - Tong, Shelley Xiuli
PY - 2025/7/15
Y1 - 2025/7/15
N2 - Morphological awareness is essential for language and literacy development, yet its underlying structure remains unclear, especially in Chinese-English bilinguals at different ages. This study tested 467 hong Kong bilingual children in Grades 2, 5, and 8 on their morphological awareness in both Chinese and English. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine whether morphological awareness in each language is a unidimensional structure, a multi-dimensional structure by task modality (i.e. receptive vs. expressive), or a multi-dimensional structure by stimulus level (i.e. Chinese: word, character, radical; English: free vs. bound morpheme). The results indicated that for L1 Chinese, morphological awareness was unidimensional in Grade 2, multi-dimensional by task modality in Grade 5, and unidimensional in Grade 8. L2 English maintained a unidimensional structure across all grades. These findings underscore how the dimensionality of morphological awareness is shaped by language-specific features and developmental changes.
AB - Morphological awareness is essential for language and literacy development, yet its underlying structure remains unclear, especially in Chinese-English bilinguals at different ages. This study tested 467 hong Kong bilingual children in Grades 2, 5, and 8 on their morphological awareness in both Chinese and English. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine whether morphological awareness in each language is a unidimensional structure, a multi-dimensional structure by task modality (i.e. receptive vs. expressive), or a multi-dimensional structure by stimulus level (i.e. Chinese: word, character, radical; English: free vs. bound morpheme). The results indicated that for L1 Chinese, morphological awareness was unidimensional in Grade 2, multi-dimensional by task modality in Grade 5, and unidimensional in Grade 8. L2 English maintained a unidimensional structure across all grades. These findings underscore how the dimensionality of morphological awareness is shaped by language-specific features and developmental changes.
U2 - 10.1080/15235882.2025.2520225
DO - 10.1080/15235882.2025.2520225
M3 - Journal article
VL - 48
SP - 260
EP - 277
JO - Bilingual Research Journal
JF - Bilingual Research Journal
SN - 1523-5882
IS - 3
ER -