Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The drivers, consequences and policy implicatio...
View graph of relations

The drivers, consequences and policy implications of non-GAAP earnings reporting

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The drivers, consequences and policy implications of non-GAAP earnings reporting. / Young, Steven.
In: Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2014, p. 444-465.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Young S. The drivers, consequences and policy implications of non-GAAP earnings reporting. Accounting and Business Research. 2014;40(4):444-465. Epub 2014 May 21. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2014.900952

Author

Young, Steven. / The drivers, consequences and policy implications of non-GAAP earnings reporting. In: Accounting and Business Research. 2014 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 444-465.

Bibtex

@article{816e2c88c55346f98af07bc11314fca3,
title = "The drivers, consequences and policy implications of non-GAAP earnings reporting",
abstract = "Non-generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) (pro forma) earnings form an increasingly important part of firms{\textquoteright} performance reporting narrative. This paper reviews the academic and professional debate surrounding non-GAAP earnings reporting by management. I argue that the demand for customised performance reporting is a natural response to constraints imposed by a one-size-fits-all reporting system and that the non-GAAP phenomenon forms part of a long-standing debate over the definition and presentation of periodic performance. A review of extant research suggests non-GAAP disclosures are driven by informative reporting and opportunistic motives. Opaque presentation of non-GAAP earnings is associated with earnings mispricing, particularly among unsophisticated investor groups. Regulations and governance systems designed to ensure transparency are associated with higher quality disclosures and less mispricing. While customised reporting behaviour is evident in many settings, I argue that such disclosures create particular risks in a financial reporting context because they threaten the integrity of the underlying reporting system. Prevailing regulatory approaches are reviewed and factors limiting disclosure transparency are highlighted. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.",
keywords = "pro forma earnings, street earnings, adjusted EPS, transitory items, Regulation G",
author = "Steven Young",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/00014788.2014.900952",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "444--465",
journal = "Accounting and Business Research",
issn = "0001-4788",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The drivers, consequences and policy implications of non-GAAP earnings reporting

AU - Young, Steven

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Non-generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) (pro forma) earnings form an increasingly important part of firms’ performance reporting narrative. This paper reviews the academic and professional debate surrounding non-GAAP earnings reporting by management. I argue that the demand for customised performance reporting is a natural response to constraints imposed by a one-size-fits-all reporting system and that the non-GAAP phenomenon forms part of a long-standing debate over the definition and presentation of periodic performance. A review of extant research suggests non-GAAP disclosures are driven by informative reporting and opportunistic motives. Opaque presentation of non-GAAP earnings is associated with earnings mispricing, particularly among unsophisticated investor groups. Regulations and governance systems designed to ensure transparency are associated with higher quality disclosures and less mispricing. While customised reporting behaviour is evident in many settings, I argue that such disclosures create particular risks in a financial reporting context because they threaten the integrity of the underlying reporting system. Prevailing regulatory approaches are reviewed and factors limiting disclosure transparency are highlighted. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.

AB - Non-generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) (pro forma) earnings form an increasingly important part of firms’ performance reporting narrative. This paper reviews the academic and professional debate surrounding non-GAAP earnings reporting by management. I argue that the demand for customised performance reporting is a natural response to constraints imposed by a one-size-fits-all reporting system and that the non-GAAP phenomenon forms part of a long-standing debate over the definition and presentation of periodic performance. A review of extant research suggests non-GAAP disclosures are driven by informative reporting and opportunistic motives. Opaque presentation of non-GAAP earnings is associated with earnings mispricing, particularly among unsophisticated investor groups. Regulations and governance systems designed to ensure transparency are associated with higher quality disclosures and less mispricing. While customised reporting behaviour is evident in many settings, I argue that such disclosures create particular risks in a financial reporting context because they threaten the integrity of the underlying reporting system. Prevailing regulatory approaches are reviewed and factors limiting disclosure transparency are highlighted. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.

KW - pro forma earnings

KW - street earnings

KW - adjusted EPS

KW - transitory items

KW - Regulation G

U2 - 10.1080/00014788.2014.900952

DO - 10.1080/00014788.2014.900952

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 444

EP - 465

JO - Accounting and Business Research

JF - Accounting and Business Research

SN - 0001-4788

IS - 4

ER -