Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The efficiency of Higher Education Institutions...

Electronic data

  • Tone_200516

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Tertiary Education and Management on 06/07/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13583883.2016.1203457

    Accepted author manuscript, 301 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in England revisited: comparing alternative measures

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in England revisited: comparing alternative measures. / Johnes, Geraint; Tone, Kaoru.
In: Tertiary Education and Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, 08.2017, p. 191-205.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Johnes G, Tone K. The efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in England revisited: comparing alternative measures. Tertiary Education and Management. 2017 Aug;23(3):191-205. Epub 2016 Jul 6. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2016.1203457

Author

Johnes, Geraint ; Tone, Kaoru. / The efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in England revisited : comparing alternative measures. In: Tertiary Education and Management. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 191-205.

Bibtex

@article{e985d167cfbe4eb68ecddf6f21f99f9e,
title = "The efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in England revisited: comparing alternative measures",
abstract = "Data envelopment analysis has often been used to evaluate efficiency in the context of higher education institutions. Yet there are numerous alternative non-parametric measures of efficiency available. This paper compares efficiency scores obtained for institutions of higher education in England, 2013-14, using three different methods: the original Charnes et al. (1978) method and two slacks-based methods (SBM-Min and SBM-Max) developed by Tone (2001, 2015). The findings suggest that results are highly sensitive to methodology chosen. Hence caution is required in applying the results in any policy context.",
keywords = "higher education, efficiency, data envelopment analysis ",
author = "Geraint Johnes and Kaoru Tone",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Tertiary Education and Management on 06/07/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13583883.2016.1203457",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1080/13583883.2016.1203457",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "191--205",
journal = "Tertiary Education and Management",
issn = "1358-3883",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in England revisited

T2 - comparing alternative measures

AU - Johnes, Geraint

AU - Tone, Kaoru

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Tertiary Education and Management on 06/07/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13583883.2016.1203457

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - Data envelopment analysis has often been used to evaluate efficiency in the context of higher education institutions. Yet there are numerous alternative non-parametric measures of efficiency available. This paper compares efficiency scores obtained for institutions of higher education in England, 2013-14, using three different methods: the original Charnes et al. (1978) method and two slacks-based methods (SBM-Min and SBM-Max) developed by Tone (2001, 2015). The findings suggest that results are highly sensitive to methodology chosen. Hence caution is required in applying the results in any policy context.

AB - Data envelopment analysis has often been used to evaluate efficiency in the context of higher education institutions. Yet there are numerous alternative non-parametric measures of efficiency available. This paper compares efficiency scores obtained for institutions of higher education in England, 2013-14, using three different methods: the original Charnes et al. (1978) method and two slacks-based methods (SBM-Min and SBM-Max) developed by Tone (2001, 2015). The findings suggest that results are highly sensitive to methodology chosen. Hence caution is required in applying the results in any policy context.

KW - higher education

KW - efficiency

KW - data envelopment analysis

U2 - 10.1080/13583883.2016.1203457

DO - 10.1080/13583883.2016.1203457

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 191

EP - 205

JO - Tertiary Education and Management

JF - Tertiary Education and Management

SN - 1358-3883

IS - 3

ER -