Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Ends of Information Systems Research: A Pra...
View graph of relations

The Ends of Information Systems Research: A Pragmatic Framework

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Ends of Information Systems Research: A Pragmatic Framework. / Constantinides, Panos; Chiasson, Mike; Introna, Lucas.

In: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2012, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Constantinides, Panos ; Chiasson, Mike ; Introna, Lucas. / The Ends of Information Systems Research: A Pragmatic Framework. In: MIS Quarterly. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 1-10.

Bibtex

@article{23960f4c1afa455280d311c6751628f6,
title = "The Ends of Information Systems Research: A Pragmatic Framework",
abstract = "In this paper, we argue that any effort to understand the state of the Information Systems field has to view IS research as a series of normative choices and value judgments about the ends of research. To assist a systematic questioning of the various ends of IS research, we propose a pragmatic framework that explores the choices IS researchers make around theories and methodologies, ethical methods of conduct, desirable outcomes, and the long-term impact of the research beyond a single site and topic area. We illustrate our framework by considering and questioning the explicit and implicit choices of topics, design and execution, and the representation of knowledge in experimental research—research often considered to be largely beyond value judgments and power relations. We conclude with the implications of our pragmatic framework by proposing practical questions for all IS researchers to consider in making choices about relevant topics, design and execution, and representation of findings in their research.",
author = "Panos Constantinides and Mike Chiasson and Lucas Introna",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "MIS Quarterly",
issn = "0276-7783",
publisher = "Management Information Systems Research Center",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Ends of Information Systems Research: A Pragmatic Framework

AU - Constantinides, Panos

AU - Chiasson, Mike

AU - Introna, Lucas

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In this paper, we argue that any effort to understand the state of the Information Systems field has to view IS research as a series of normative choices and value judgments about the ends of research. To assist a systematic questioning of the various ends of IS research, we propose a pragmatic framework that explores the choices IS researchers make around theories and methodologies, ethical methods of conduct, desirable outcomes, and the long-term impact of the research beyond a single site and topic area. We illustrate our framework by considering and questioning the explicit and implicit choices of topics, design and execution, and the representation of knowledge in experimental research—research often considered to be largely beyond value judgments and power relations. We conclude with the implications of our pragmatic framework by proposing practical questions for all IS researchers to consider in making choices about relevant topics, design and execution, and representation of findings in their research.

AB - In this paper, we argue that any effort to understand the state of the Information Systems field has to view IS research as a series of normative choices and value judgments about the ends of research. To assist a systematic questioning of the various ends of IS research, we propose a pragmatic framework that explores the choices IS researchers make around theories and methodologies, ethical methods of conduct, desirable outcomes, and the long-term impact of the research beyond a single site and topic area. We illustrate our framework by considering and questioning the explicit and implicit choices of topics, design and execution, and the representation of knowledge in experimental research—research often considered to be largely beyond value judgments and power relations. We conclude with the implications of our pragmatic framework by proposing practical questions for all IS researchers to consider in making choices about relevant topics, design and execution, and representation of findings in their research.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - MIS Quarterly

JF - MIS Quarterly

SN - 0276-7783

IS - 1

ER -