Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalizatio...
View graph of relations

The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalization' of Selection

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalization' of Selection. / Noon, Mike; Healy, Geraldine; Forson, C. et al.
In: British Journal of Management, Vol. 24, No. 3, 30.09.2013, p. 333-346.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Noon, M, Healy, G, Forson, C & Oikelome, F 2013, 'The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalization' of Selection', British Journal of Management, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00807.x

APA

Noon, M., Healy, G., Forson, C., & Oikelome, F. (2013). The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalization' of Selection. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00807.x

Vancouver

Noon M, Healy G, Forson C, Oikelome F. The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalization' of Selection. British Journal of Management. 2013 Sept 30;24(3):333-346. Epub 2012 Jan 30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00807.x

Author

Noon, Mike ; Healy, Geraldine ; Forson, C. et al. / The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalization' of Selection. In: British Journal of Management. 2013 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 333-346.

Bibtex

@article{0bdf087cee744c73a9da67a040024b24,
title = "The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalization' of Selection",
abstract = "This paper explores how formalization of employee selection procedures for the purpose of ensuring equality of opportunity can become so extensive that the intended outcome of fairness is undermined. Drawing on empirical evidence from a large media organization, the analysis reveals the detrimental impact of formalization in relation to the recruitment of ethnic minority staff. While the existing literature describes how, during recruitment of employees, the circumvention of formal equality procedures can occur through managerial neglect and manipulation, the analysis in this paper shows that, paradoxically, circumvention can also occur through compliance with procedures. This new category takes three forms (robotic, defensive and malicious) and appears under conditions of excessive formalization – the term hyper-formalization is coined to describe this. The paper develops new concepts that add to understanding of the limitations of equality and diversity procedures, and brings fresh challenges to some of the liberal assumptions about the efficacy and desirability of formalization for achieving fairness.",
author = "Mike Noon and Geraldine Healy and C. Forson and Franklin Oikelome",
year = "2013",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00807.x",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "333--346",
journal = "British Journal of Management",
issn = "1045-3172",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Equality Effects of the 'Hyper-formalization' of Selection

AU - Noon, Mike

AU - Healy, Geraldine

AU - Forson, C.

AU - Oikelome, Franklin

PY - 2013/9/30

Y1 - 2013/9/30

N2 - This paper explores how formalization of employee selection procedures for the purpose of ensuring equality of opportunity can become so extensive that the intended outcome of fairness is undermined. Drawing on empirical evidence from a large media organization, the analysis reveals the detrimental impact of formalization in relation to the recruitment of ethnic minority staff. While the existing literature describes how, during recruitment of employees, the circumvention of formal equality procedures can occur through managerial neglect and manipulation, the analysis in this paper shows that, paradoxically, circumvention can also occur through compliance with procedures. This new category takes three forms (robotic, defensive and malicious) and appears under conditions of excessive formalization – the term hyper-formalization is coined to describe this. The paper develops new concepts that add to understanding of the limitations of equality and diversity procedures, and brings fresh challenges to some of the liberal assumptions about the efficacy and desirability of formalization for achieving fairness.

AB - This paper explores how formalization of employee selection procedures for the purpose of ensuring equality of opportunity can become so extensive that the intended outcome of fairness is undermined. Drawing on empirical evidence from a large media organization, the analysis reveals the detrimental impact of formalization in relation to the recruitment of ethnic minority staff. While the existing literature describes how, during recruitment of employees, the circumvention of formal equality procedures can occur through managerial neglect and manipulation, the analysis in this paper shows that, paradoxically, circumvention can also occur through compliance with procedures. This new category takes three forms (robotic, defensive and malicious) and appears under conditions of excessive formalization – the term hyper-formalization is coined to describe this. The paper develops new concepts that add to understanding of the limitations of equality and diversity procedures, and brings fresh challenges to some of the liberal assumptions about the efficacy and desirability of formalization for achieving fairness.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00807.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00807.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 333

EP - 346

JO - British Journal of Management

JF - British Journal of Management

SN - 1045-3172

IS - 3

ER -