Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The ethics of evaluating obesity intervention s...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The ethics of evaluating obesity intervention studies on children

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The ethics of evaluating obesity intervention studies on children. / Wickins-Drazilova, D.; Williams, G.

In: International Journal of Obesity, Vol. 35, 2011, p. S24-S29.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Wickins-Drazilova, D. ; Williams, G. / The ethics of evaluating obesity intervention studies on children. In: International Journal of Obesity. 2011 ; Vol. 35. pp. S24-S29.

Bibtex

@article{f5ba3a6aea084782887a2b6770b359bd,
title = "The ethics of evaluating obesity intervention studies on children",
abstract = "The methodology of the IDEFICS (Identification and prevention of dietary- and lifestyle-induced health effects in children and infants) study raises a number of important ethical questions. Many of these are already well recognised in ethical guidelines that uphold principles of individual and parental consent, confidentiality and scientific review. There are, however, wider issues that require ethical reflection. In this paper, we focus on a set of problems surrounding the evaluation of complex social interventions, and argue that comprehensive and objective evaluation is a much more ethically charged aim than it may first appear. In particular, we contend that standard scientific measuresFof body size and biomarkersFconvey only part of the story. This is partly because, when we intervene in communities, we are also concerned with complex social effects. These effects are made even more complex by contemporary social anxieties about fat and physical appearance, as well as about the safety and security of children. Such anxieties increase the risk of undesirable side effects that are themselves difficult to gauge. In the face of these and other complexities, we argue that the evaluation of interventions should involve a strong ethical dimension. First, it must includeFas does the IDEFICS studyFconsideration of the opinions of the people affected, who are subjected to interventions in ways that necessarily go beyond individual consent. Second, we suggest that interventions might also be assessed by how much they empower peopleFand especially those persons, such as children, who are otherwise often disempowered.",
keywords = "ethics, public policy, children, intervention study, evaluation",
author = "D. Wickins-Drazilova and G. Williams",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1038/ijo.2011.32",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "S24--S29",
journal = "International Journal of Obesity",
issn = "0307-0565",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ethics of evaluating obesity intervention studies on children

AU - Wickins-Drazilova, D.

AU - Williams, G.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The methodology of the IDEFICS (Identification and prevention of dietary- and lifestyle-induced health effects in children and infants) study raises a number of important ethical questions. Many of these are already well recognised in ethical guidelines that uphold principles of individual and parental consent, confidentiality and scientific review. There are, however, wider issues that require ethical reflection. In this paper, we focus on a set of problems surrounding the evaluation of complex social interventions, and argue that comprehensive and objective evaluation is a much more ethically charged aim than it may first appear. In particular, we contend that standard scientific measuresFof body size and biomarkersFconvey only part of the story. This is partly because, when we intervene in communities, we are also concerned with complex social effects. These effects are made even more complex by contemporary social anxieties about fat and physical appearance, as well as about the safety and security of children. Such anxieties increase the risk of undesirable side effects that are themselves difficult to gauge. In the face of these and other complexities, we argue that the evaluation of interventions should involve a strong ethical dimension. First, it must includeFas does the IDEFICS studyFconsideration of the opinions of the people affected, who are subjected to interventions in ways that necessarily go beyond individual consent. Second, we suggest that interventions might also be assessed by how much they empower peopleFand especially those persons, such as children, who are otherwise often disempowered.

AB - The methodology of the IDEFICS (Identification and prevention of dietary- and lifestyle-induced health effects in children and infants) study raises a number of important ethical questions. Many of these are already well recognised in ethical guidelines that uphold principles of individual and parental consent, confidentiality and scientific review. There are, however, wider issues that require ethical reflection. In this paper, we focus on a set of problems surrounding the evaluation of complex social interventions, and argue that comprehensive and objective evaluation is a much more ethically charged aim than it may first appear. In particular, we contend that standard scientific measuresFof body size and biomarkersFconvey only part of the story. This is partly because, when we intervene in communities, we are also concerned with complex social effects. These effects are made even more complex by contemporary social anxieties about fat and physical appearance, as well as about the safety and security of children. Such anxieties increase the risk of undesirable side effects that are themselves difficult to gauge. In the face of these and other complexities, we argue that the evaluation of interventions should involve a strong ethical dimension. First, it must includeFas does the IDEFICS studyFconsideration of the opinions of the people affected, who are subjected to interventions in ways that necessarily go beyond individual consent. Second, we suggest that interventions might also be assessed by how much they empower peopleFand especially those persons, such as children, who are otherwise often disempowered.

KW - ethics

KW - public policy

KW - children

KW - intervention study

KW - evaluation

U2 - 10.1038/ijo.2011.32

DO - 10.1038/ijo.2011.32

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - S24-S29

JO - International Journal of Obesity

JF - International Journal of Obesity

SN - 0307-0565

ER -