Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The EU-ACP economic partnership agreements and ...
View graph of relations

The EU-ACP economic partnership agreements and the development question : constraints and opportunities posed by Article XX1V and special and differential treatment provisions of the WTO.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The EU-ACP economic partnership agreements and the development question : constraints and opportunities posed by Article XX1V and special and differential treatment provisions of the WTO. / Ochieng, Cosmas C. M.
In: Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 10, No. 2, 06.2007, p. 363-395.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{cf26c1d5a8e74b9380b21851b8f74bda,
title = "The EU-ACP economic partnership agreements and the development question : constraints and opportunities posed by Article XX1V and special and differential treatment provisions of the WTO.",
abstract = "This article argues that Article XXIV and special and differential treatment (SDT) provisions of the WTO present a number of constraints and opportunities to the design and scope of the proposed economic partnership agreements between the European Union (EU) and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. It examines the negotiating positions of both sides to argue that were the EU's position to prevail, ACP and other developing countries would likely suffer an erosion of the development principles embedded within the WTO. It is shown that the differences between the two groups over the desirability and/or applicability of negotiating free trade agreements between developed and developing countries under the strict jurisdiction of Article XXIV, and of negotiating agreements on services and the Singapore Issues , amount to a contestation over the principles of reciprocity and SDT within the WTO, and of the scope of the WTO.",
keywords = "EPAs, Regional Trade Agreements, ACP-EU",
author = "Ochieng, {Cosmas C. M.}",
year = "2007",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1093/jiel/jgm009",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "363--395",
journal = "Journal of International Economic Law",
issn = "1369-3034",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The EU-ACP economic partnership agreements and the development question : constraints and opportunities posed by Article XX1V and special and differential treatment provisions of the WTO.

AU - Ochieng, Cosmas C. M.

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - This article argues that Article XXIV and special and differential treatment (SDT) provisions of the WTO present a number of constraints and opportunities to the design and scope of the proposed economic partnership agreements between the European Union (EU) and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. It examines the negotiating positions of both sides to argue that were the EU's position to prevail, ACP and other developing countries would likely suffer an erosion of the development principles embedded within the WTO. It is shown that the differences between the two groups over the desirability and/or applicability of negotiating free trade agreements between developed and developing countries under the strict jurisdiction of Article XXIV, and of negotiating agreements on services and the Singapore Issues , amount to a contestation over the principles of reciprocity and SDT within the WTO, and of the scope of the WTO.

AB - This article argues that Article XXIV and special and differential treatment (SDT) provisions of the WTO present a number of constraints and opportunities to the design and scope of the proposed economic partnership agreements between the European Union (EU) and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. It examines the negotiating positions of both sides to argue that were the EU's position to prevail, ACP and other developing countries would likely suffer an erosion of the development principles embedded within the WTO. It is shown that the differences between the two groups over the desirability and/or applicability of negotiating free trade agreements between developed and developing countries under the strict jurisdiction of Article XXIV, and of negotiating agreements on services and the Singapore Issues , amount to a contestation over the principles of reciprocity and SDT within the WTO, and of the scope of the WTO.

KW - EPAs

KW - Regional Trade Agreements

KW - ACP-EU

U2 - 10.1093/jiel/jgm009

DO - 10.1093/jiel/jgm009

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 363

EP - 395

JO - Journal of International Economic Law

JF - Journal of International Economic Law

SN - 1369-3034

IS - 2

ER -