Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychotherapy Research on 29/07/2016 , available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10503307.2016.1208373
Accepted author manuscript, 170 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The experience of forming a therapeutic relationship from the client’s perspective
T2 - a metasynthesis
AU - Noyce, Rosie
AU - Simpson, Jane
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychotherapy Research on 29/07/2016 , available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10503307.2016.1208373
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Objective: This review aimed to synthesize qualitative research exploring clients’ perspectives of forming a therapeutic relationship with their therapist or counsellor. Method: Noblit and Hare’s meta-ethnographic approach was used to guide the synthesis of 13 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The quality of each study was rated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme quality rating checklist. Results: Findings demonstrated that clients create a hierarchy of desired therapist characteristics to assess how well the therapy can meet their needs (theme 1: assessing client-therapist match). The formation of the therapeutic relationship is facilitated by an openness from both the therapist and client (theme 2: facilitating openness) and helps to develop a connection through which the client can be fundamentally understood (theme 3: connecting on a deeper level). Displays of disrespectful or disempowering behaviour generate barriers in the formation of a therapeutic relationship (theme 4: empowerment through respect). Conclusions: The meta-ethnographic approach extended the findings from each individual study to highlight some significant discoveries, including that clients across different settings created a hierarchy of therapist characteristics which were of varying importance to them depending on their perceived needs. Additionally, clients reported that they preferred their therapists to disclose information in order to facilitate the therapeutic relationship.
AB - Objective: This review aimed to synthesize qualitative research exploring clients’ perspectives of forming a therapeutic relationship with their therapist or counsellor. Method: Noblit and Hare’s meta-ethnographic approach was used to guide the synthesis of 13 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The quality of each study was rated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme quality rating checklist. Results: Findings demonstrated that clients create a hierarchy of desired therapist characteristics to assess how well the therapy can meet their needs (theme 1: assessing client-therapist match). The formation of the therapeutic relationship is facilitated by an openness from both the therapist and client (theme 2: facilitating openness) and helps to develop a connection through which the client can be fundamentally understood (theme 3: connecting on a deeper level). Displays of disrespectful or disempowering behaviour generate barriers in the formation of a therapeutic relationship (theme 4: empowerment through respect). Conclusions: The meta-ethnographic approach extended the findings from each individual study to highlight some significant discoveries, including that clients across different settings created a hierarchy of therapist characteristics which were of varying importance to them depending on their perceived needs. Additionally, clients reported that they preferred their therapists to disclose information in order to facilitate the therapeutic relationship.
KW - therapeutic relationship
KW - alliance
KW - qualitative research
KW - metasynthesis
KW - empowerment
KW - therapist self-disclosure
U2 - 10.1080/10503307.2016.1208373
DO - 10.1080/10503307.2016.1208373
M3 - Journal article
VL - 28
SP - 281
EP - 296
JO - Psychotherapy Research
JF - Psychotherapy Research
SN - 1050-3307
IS - 2
ER -