Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The foodscape

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

The foodscape: classification and field validation of secondary data sources

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

The foodscape: classification and field validation of secondary data sources. / Lake, Amelia A.; Burgoine, Thomas; Greenhalgh, Fiona et al.
In: Health and Place, Vol. 16, No. 4, 07.2010, p. 666-673.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Lake, AA, Burgoine, T, Greenhalgh, F, Stamp, E & Tyrrell, R 2010, 'The foodscape: classification and field validation of secondary data sources', Health and Place, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 666-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.02.004

APA

Lake, A. A., Burgoine, T., Greenhalgh, F., Stamp, E., & Tyrrell, R. (2010). The foodscape: classification and field validation of secondary data sources. Health and Place, 16(4), 666-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.02.004

Vancouver

Lake AA, Burgoine T, Greenhalgh F, Stamp E, Tyrrell R. The foodscape: classification and field validation of secondary data sources. Health and Place. 2010 Jul;16(4):666-673. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.02.004

Author

Lake, Amelia A. ; Burgoine, Thomas ; Greenhalgh, Fiona et al. / The foodscape : classification and field validation of secondary data sources. In: Health and Place. 2010 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 666-673.

Bibtex

@article{8698b1375e054cec86c8a8532a727c4b,
title = "The foodscape: classification and field validation of secondary data sources",
abstract = "The aims were to; develop a food environment classification tool and to test the acceptability and validity of three secondary sources of food environment data within a defined urban area of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, using a field validation method.A 21 point (with 77 sub-categories) classification tool was developed. The fieldwork recorded 617 establishments selling food and/or food products. The sensitivity analysis of the secondary sources against fieldwork for the Newcastle City Council data was good (83.6%), while Yell.com and the Yellow Pages were low (51.2% and 50.9%, respectively).To improve the quality of secondary data, multiple sources should be used in order to achieve a realistic picture of the foodscape. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Food environment, Foodscape, Classification, Secondary data, Obesogenic environments, FOOD ENVIRONMENT, OBESITY, STATE, PREVALENCE, SCIENCE, ACCESS, POLICY, STORES",
author = "Lake, {Amelia A.} and Thomas Burgoine and Fiona Greenhalgh and Elaine Stamp and Rachel Tyrrell",
year = "2010",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.02.004",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "666--673",
journal = "Health and Place",
issn = "1353-8292",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The foodscape

T2 - classification and field validation of secondary data sources

AU - Lake, Amelia A.

AU - Burgoine, Thomas

AU - Greenhalgh, Fiona

AU - Stamp, Elaine

AU - Tyrrell, Rachel

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - The aims were to; develop a food environment classification tool and to test the acceptability and validity of three secondary sources of food environment data within a defined urban area of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, using a field validation method.A 21 point (with 77 sub-categories) classification tool was developed. The fieldwork recorded 617 establishments selling food and/or food products. The sensitivity analysis of the secondary sources against fieldwork for the Newcastle City Council data was good (83.6%), while Yell.com and the Yellow Pages were low (51.2% and 50.9%, respectively).To improve the quality of secondary data, multiple sources should be used in order to achieve a realistic picture of the foodscape. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - The aims were to; develop a food environment classification tool and to test the acceptability and validity of three secondary sources of food environment data within a defined urban area of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, using a field validation method.A 21 point (with 77 sub-categories) classification tool was developed. The fieldwork recorded 617 establishments selling food and/or food products. The sensitivity analysis of the secondary sources against fieldwork for the Newcastle City Council data was good (83.6%), while Yell.com and the Yellow Pages were low (51.2% and 50.9%, respectively).To improve the quality of secondary data, multiple sources should be used in order to achieve a realistic picture of the foodscape. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Food environment

KW - Foodscape

KW - Classification

KW - Secondary data

KW - Obesogenic environments

KW - FOOD ENVIRONMENT

KW - OBESITY

KW - STATE

KW - PREVALENCE

KW - SCIENCE

KW - ACCESS

KW - POLICY

KW - STORES

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.02.004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 666

EP - 673

JO - Health and Place

JF - Health and Place

SN - 1353-8292

IS - 4

ER -