Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may refl...
View graph of relations

The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch. / Gockel, Hedwig E.; Carlyon, Robert P.; Mehta, Anahita et al.
In: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Vol. 12, No. 6, 12.2011, p. 767-782.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Gockel, HE, Carlyon, RP, Mehta, A & Plack, CJ 2011, 'The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch', Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-011-0284-1

APA

Gockel, H. E., Carlyon, R. P., Mehta, A., & Plack, C. J. (2011). The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 12(6), 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-011-0284-1

Vancouver

Gockel HE, Carlyon RP, Mehta A, Plack CJ. The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2011 Dec;12(6):767-782. doi: 10.1007/s10162-011-0284-1

Author

Gockel, Hedwig E. ; Carlyon, Robert P. ; Mehta, Anahita et al. / The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch. In: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2011 ; Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 767-782.

Bibtex

@article{d162c728065347d49f80bb74c4898fbe,
title = "The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch",
abstract = "The frequency following response (FFR), a scalp-recorded measure of phase-locked brainstem activity, is often assumed to reflect the pitch of sounds as perceived by humans. In two experiments, we investigated the characteristics of the FFR evoked by complex tones. FFR waveforms to alternating-polarity stimuli were averaged for each polarity and added, to enhance envelope, or subtracted, to enhance temporal fine structure information. In experiment 1, frequency-shifted complex tones, with all harmonics shifted by the same amount in Hertz, were presented diotically. Only the autocorrelation functions (ACFs) of the subtraction-FFR waveforms showed a peak at a delay shifted in the direction of the expected pitch shifts. This expected pitch shift was also present in the ACFs of the output of an auditory nerve model. In experiment 2, the components of a harmonic complex with harmonic numbers 2, 3, and 4 were presented either to the same ear ({"}mono{"}) or the third harmonic was presented contralaterally to the ear receiving the even harmonics ({"}dichotic{"}). In the latter case, a pitch corresponding to the missing fundamental was still perceived. Monaural control conditions presenting only the even harmonics ({"}2 + 4{"}) or only the third harmonic ({"}3{"}) were also tested. Both the subtraction and the addition waveforms showed that (1) the FFR magnitude spectra for {"}dichotic{"} were similar to the sum of the spectra for the two monaural control conditions and lacked peaks at the fundamental frequency and other distortion products visible for {"}mono{"} and (2) ACFs for {"}dichotic{"} were similar to those for {"}2 + 4{"} and dissimilar to those for {"}mono.{"} The results indicate that the neural responses reflected in the FFR preserve monaural temporal information that may be important for pitch, but provide no evidence for any additional processing over and above that already present in the auditory periphery, and do not directly represent the pitch of dichotic stimuli.",
keywords = "complex tones, dichotic presentation, monaural temporal information, MISSING FUNDAMENTAL STIMULI, HUMAN AUDITORY-CORTEX, HUMAN BRAIN-STEM, COMPLEX TONES, PHASE SENSITIVITY, SYNTHETIC VOWELS, COMPUTER-MODEL, VIRTUAL PITCH, RESIDUE PITCH, PURE-TONE",
author = "Gockel, {Hedwig E.} and Carlyon, {Robert P.} and Anahita Mehta and Plack, {Christopher J.}",
year = "2011",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/s10162-011-0284-1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "767--782",
journal = "Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology",
issn = "1525-3961",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch

AU - Gockel, Hedwig E.

AU - Carlyon, Robert P.

AU - Mehta, Anahita

AU - Plack, Christopher J.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - The frequency following response (FFR), a scalp-recorded measure of phase-locked brainstem activity, is often assumed to reflect the pitch of sounds as perceived by humans. In two experiments, we investigated the characteristics of the FFR evoked by complex tones. FFR waveforms to alternating-polarity stimuli were averaged for each polarity and added, to enhance envelope, or subtracted, to enhance temporal fine structure information. In experiment 1, frequency-shifted complex tones, with all harmonics shifted by the same amount in Hertz, were presented diotically. Only the autocorrelation functions (ACFs) of the subtraction-FFR waveforms showed a peak at a delay shifted in the direction of the expected pitch shifts. This expected pitch shift was also present in the ACFs of the output of an auditory nerve model. In experiment 2, the components of a harmonic complex with harmonic numbers 2, 3, and 4 were presented either to the same ear ("mono") or the third harmonic was presented contralaterally to the ear receiving the even harmonics ("dichotic"). In the latter case, a pitch corresponding to the missing fundamental was still perceived. Monaural control conditions presenting only the even harmonics ("2 + 4") or only the third harmonic ("3") were also tested. Both the subtraction and the addition waveforms showed that (1) the FFR magnitude spectra for "dichotic" were similar to the sum of the spectra for the two monaural control conditions and lacked peaks at the fundamental frequency and other distortion products visible for "mono" and (2) ACFs for "dichotic" were similar to those for "2 + 4" and dissimilar to those for "mono." The results indicate that the neural responses reflected in the FFR preserve monaural temporal information that may be important for pitch, but provide no evidence for any additional processing over and above that already present in the auditory periphery, and do not directly represent the pitch of dichotic stimuli.

AB - The frequency following response (FFR), a scalp-recorded measure of phase-locked brainstem activity, is often assumed to reflect the pitch of sounds as perceived by humans. In two experiments, we investigated the characteristics of the FFR evoked by complex tones. FFR waveforms to alternating-polarity stimuli were averaged for each polarity and added, to enhance envelope, or subtracted, to enhance temporal fine structure information. In experiment 1, frequency-shifted complex tones, with all harmonics shifted by the same amount in Hertz, were presented diotically. Only the autocorrelation functions (ACFs) of the subtraction-FFR waveforms showed a peak at a delay shifted in the direction of the expected pitch shifts. This expected pitch shift was also present in the ACFs of the output of an auditory nerve model. In experiment 2, the components of a harmonic complex with harmonic numbers 2, 3, and 4 were presented either to the same ear ("mono") or the third harmonic was presented contralaterally to the ear receiving the even harmonics ("dichotic"). In the latter case, a pitch corresponding to the missing fundamental was still perceived. Monaural control conditions presenting only the even harmonics ("2 + 4") or only the third harmonic ("3") were also tested. Both the subtraction and the addition waveforms showed that (1) the FFR magnitude spectra for "dichotic" were similar to the sum of the spectra for the two monaural control conditions and lacked peaks at the fundamental frequency and other distortion products visible for "mono" and (2) ACFs for "dichotic" were similar to those for "2 + 4" and dissimilar to those for "mono." The results indicate that the neural responses reflected in the FFR preserve monaural temporal information that may be important for pitch, but provide no evidence for any additional processing over and above that already present in the auditory periphery, and do not directly represent the pitch of dichotic stimuli.

KW - complex tones

KW - dichotic presentation

KW - monaural temporal information

KW - MISSING FUNDAMENTAL STIMULI

KW - HUMAN AUDITORY-CORTEX

KW - HUMAN BRAIN-STEM

KW - COMPLEX TONES

KW - PHASE SENSITIVITY

KW - SYNTHETIC VOWELS

KW - COMPUTER-MODEL

KW - VIRTUAL PITCH

KW - RESIDUE PITCH

KW - PURE-TONE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855713384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10162-011-0284-1

DO - 10.1007/s10162-011-0284-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 767

EP - 782

JO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

JF - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

SN - 1525-3961

IS - 6

ER -