Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The impact of chemotherapy-related nausea on pa...
View graph of relations

The impact of chemotherapy-related nausea on patients' nutritional status, psychological distress and quality of life

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The impact of chemotherapy-related nausea on patients' nutritional status, psychological distress and quality of life. / Farrell, Carole; Brearley, Sarah G.; Pilling, Mark et al.
In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 59-66.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Farrell C, Brearley SG, Pilling M, Molassiotis A. The impact of chemotherapy-related nausea on patients' nutritional status, psychological distress and quality of life. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2013 Jan;21(1):59-66. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1493-9

Author

Farrell, Carole ; Brearley, Sarah G. ; Pilling, Mark et al. / The impact of chemotherapy-related nausea on patients' nutritional status, psychological distress and quality of life. In: Supportive Care in Cancer. 2013 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 59-66.

Bibtex

@article{1bb083a94cf6446291a814a84dc1aaeb,
title = "The impact of chemotherapy-related nausea on patients' nutritional status, psychological distress and quality of life",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Nausea is a troublesome and distressing symptom for patients receiving chemotherapy. While vomiting is well controlled with current antiemetics, nausea is a more difficult symptom to manage. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nausea on nutritional status, quality of life and psychological distress. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study over two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients completed the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool, a measure of nutritional status (Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) quality of life scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at the end of each chemotherapy cycle (around day 10 post-chemotherapy). RESULTS: The sample consisted of 104 patients, primarily female, receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. While vomiting was minimal (5.2-14.6 % of the patients), high levels of nausea were observed (55.2-72.9 %), and severe nausea (>6 on a 0-10 scale) was reported by 20.5-29.2 % of the participants. Severe nausea had a borderline significant impact in relation to physical functioning (p = 0.025) and a significant impact on nutritional status (severe acute nausea, p = 0.003; severe delayed nausea, p = 0.017). Clinically meaningful changes were observed in relation to the FACT-G total score. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy-induced nausea does have an impact on nutritional status and physical functioning and can impair anxiety and quality of life. As a key symptom associated with other symptoms, it is imperative that greater attention is given to managing treatment-related nausea through innovative non-pharmacological and nutritional interventions.",
keywords = "Nausea , Chemotherapy , Nutrition , Anxiety , Depression, Quality of life , Physical functioning",
author = "Carole Farrell and Brearley, {Sarah G.} and Mark Pilling and Alex Molassiotis",
year = "2013",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1007/s00520-012-1493-9",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "59--66",
journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
issn = "1433-7339",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of chemotherapy-related nausea on patients' nutritional status, psychological distress and quality of life

AU - Farrell, Carole

AU - Brearley, Sarah G.

AU - Pilling, Mark

AU - Molassiotis, Alex

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - PURPOSE: Nausea is a troublesome and distressing symptom for patients receiving chemotherapy. While vomiting is well controlled with current antiemetics, nausea is a more difficult symptom to manage. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nausea on nutritional status, quality of life and psychological distress. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study over two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients completed the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool, a measure of nutritional status (Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) quality of life scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at the end of each chemotherapy cycle (around day 10 post-chemotherapy). RESULTS: The sample consisted of 104 patients, primarily female, receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. While vomiting was minimal (5.2-14.6 % of the patients), high levels of nausea were observed (55.2-72.9 %), and severe nausea (>6 on a 0-10 scale) was reported by 20.5-29.2 % of the participants. Severe nausea had a borderline significant impact in relation to physical functioning (p = 0.025) and a significant impact on nutritional status (severe acute nausea, p = 0.003; severe delayed nausea, p = 0.017). Clinically meaningful changes were observed in relation to the FACT-G total score. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy-induced nausea does have an impact on nutritional status and physical functioning and can impair anxiety and quality of life. As a key symptom associated with other symptoms, it is imperative that greater attention is given to managing treatment-related nausea through innovative non-pharmacological and nutritional interventions.

AB - PURPOSE: Nausea is a troublesome and distressing symptom for patients receiving chemotherapy. While vomiting is well controlled with current antiemetics, nausea is a more difficult symptom to manage. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nausea on nutritional status, quality of life and psychological distress. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study over two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients completed the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool, a measure of nutritional status (Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) quality of life scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at the end of each chemotherapy cycle (around day 10 post-chemotherapy). RESULTS: The sample consisted of 104 patients, primarily female, receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. While vomiting was minimal (5.2-14.6 % of the patients), high levels of nausea were observed (55.2-72.9 %), and severe nausea (>6 on a 0-10 scale) was reported by 20.5-29.2 % of the participants. Severe nausea had a borderline significant impact in relation to physical functioning (p = 0.025) and a significant impact on nutritional status (severe acute nausea, p = 0.003; severe delayed nausea, p = 0.017). Clinically meaningful changes were observed in relation to the FACT-G total score. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy-induced nausea does have an impact on nutritional status and physical functioning and can impair anxiety and quality of life. As a key symptom associated with other symptoms, it is imperative that greater attention is given to managing treatment-related nausea through innovative non-pharmacological and nutritional interventions.

KW - Nausea

KW - Chemotherapy

KW - Nutrition

KW - Anxiety

KW - Depression

KW - Quality of life

KW - Physical functioning

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-012-1493-9

DO - 10.1007/s00520-012-1493-9

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22610269

VL - 21

SP - 59

EP - 66

JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

SN - 1433-7339

IS - 1

ER -