Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Importance of Being Thing

Electronic data

  • The importance of being thing - Sumi Helal v22

    Rights statement: ©2019 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

    Accepted author manuscript, 665 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The Importance of Being Thing: Or the Trivial Role of Powering Serious IoT Scenarios

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

The Importance of Being Thing: Or the Trivial Role of Powering Serious IoT Scenarios. / Helal, Sumi; Khaled, Ahmed; Lindquist, Wyatt.
Proceedings of the IEEE ICDCS Conference 2019. IEEE, 2019. p. 1852-1859.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Helal S, Khaled A, Lindquist W. The Importance of Being Thing: Or the Trivial Role of Powering Serious IoT Scenarios. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICDCS Conference 2019. IEEE. 2019. p. 1852-1859 doi: 10.1109/ICDCS.2019.00183

Author

Helal, Sumi ; Khaled, Ahmed ; Lindquist, Wyatt. / The Importance of Being Thing : Or the Trivial Role of Powering Serious IoT Scenarios. Proceedings of the IEEE ICDCS Conference 2019. IEEE, 2019. pp. 1852-1859

Bibtex

@inproceedings{03a69d6686be431aacd407127b52dc6d,
title = "The Importance of Being Thing: Or the Trivial Role of Powering Serious IoT Scenarios",
abstract = "In this article, we call for a {"}Walk Before You Run{"} adjustment in the Internet-of-Things (IoT) research and development exercise. Without first settling the quest for what thing is or could be or do, we run the risk of presumptuous visions, or hypes, that can only fail the realities and limits of what is actually possible, leading to customers and consumers confusion as well as market hesitations. Specifically, without a carefully-designed Thing architecture in place, it will be very difficult to find the “magic” we are so addicted and accustomed to – programming! Programming the IoT, as we once programmed the mainframe, the workstation, the PC and the mobile devices, is the natural way to realize a fancy IoT scenario or an application. Without Thing architectures and their enablement of new programming models for IoT – we will continue to only envision fancy scenarios but unable to unleash the IoT full potential. This article raises these concerns and provides a view into the future by first looking back into our short history of pervasive computing. The article focuses on the domain of “Personal” IoT and will address key new requirements for such Thing architecture. Also, practicing what we preach, we present our ongoing efforts on the Atlas Thing Architecture showing how it supports a variety of thing notions,and how it enables novel models for programmability. ",
author = "Sumi Helal and Ahmed Khaled and Wyatt Lindquist",
note = "{\textcopyright}2019 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE. ",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1109/ICDCS.2019.00183",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781728125206",
pages = "1852--1859",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the IEEE ICDCS Conference 2019",
publisher = "IEEE",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - The Importance of Being Thing

T2 - Or the Trivial Role of Powering Serious IoT Scenarios

AU - Helal, Sumi

AU - Khaled, Ahmed

AU - Lindquist, Wyatt

N1 - ©2019 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

PY - 2019/10/31

Y1 - 2019/10/31

N2 - In this article, we call for a "Walk Before You Run" adjustment in the Internet-of-Things (IoT) research and development exercise. Without first settling the quest for what thing is or could be or do, we run the risk of presumptuous visions, or hypes, that can only fail the realities and limits of what is actually possible, leading to customers and consumers confusion as well as market hesitations. Specifically, without a carefully-designed Thing architecture in place, it will be very difficult to find the “magic” we are so addicted and accustomed to – programming! Programming the IoT, as we once programmed the mainframe, the workstation, the PC and the mobile devices, is the natural way to realize a fancy IoT scenario or an application. Without Thing architectures and their enablement of new programming models for IoT – we will continue to only envision fancy scenarios but unable to unleash the IoT full potential. This article raises these concerns and provides a view into the future by first looking back into our short history of pervasive computing. The article focuses on the domain of “Personal” IoT and will address key new requirements for such Thing architecture. Also, practicing what we preach, we present our ongoing efforts on the Atlas Thing Architecture showing how it supports a variety of thing notions,and how it enables novel models for programmability.

AB - In this article, we call for a "Walk Before You Run" adjustment in the Internet-of-Things (IoT) research and development exercise. Without first settling the quest for what thing is or could be or do, we run the risk of presumptuous visions, or hypes, that can only fail the realities and limits of what is actually possible, leading to customers and consumers confusion as well as market hesitations. Specifically, without a carefully-designed Thing architecture in place, it will be very difficult to find the “magic” we are so addicted and accustomed to – programming! Programming the IoT, as we once programmed the mainframe, the workstation, the PC and the mobile devices, is the natural way to realize a fancy IoT scenario or an application. Without Thing architectures and their enablement of new programming models for IoT – we will continue to only envision fancy scenarios but unable to unleash the IoT full potential. This article raises these concerns and provides a view into the future by first looking back into our short history of pervasive computing. The article focuses on the domain of “Personal” IoT and will address key new requirements for such Thing architecture. Also, practicing what we preach, we present our ongoing efforts on the Atlas Thing Architecture showing how it supports a variety of thing notions,and how it enables novel models for programmability.

U2 - 10.1109/ICDCS.2019.00183

DO - 10.1109/ICDCS.2019.00183

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 9781728125206

SP - 1852

EP - 1859

BT - Proceedings of the IEEE ICDCS Conference 2019

PB - IEEE

ER -