Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor

Electronic data

  • IRD-EBR-resubmission April 2024 accepted copy

    Accepted author manuscript, 546 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

  • s00221-024-06846-3

    Final published version, 1.58 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor: Singleton vs multiple distractors

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor: Singleton vs multiple distractors. / Smith, Ellie; Crawford, Trevor.
In: Experimental Brain Research, 31.05.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Smith E, Crawford T. The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor: Singleton vs multiple distractors. Experimental Brain Research. 2024 May 31. Epub 2024 May 31. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06846-3

Author

Bibtex

@article{e4878ca58bda468e987b53cad5f3d2cf,
title = "The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor: Singleton vs multiple distractors",
abstract = "In the complex interplay between sensory and cognitive processes, the brain must sift through a flood of sensory data to pinpoint relevant signals. This selective mechanism is crucial for the effective control of behaviour, by allowing organisms to focus on important tasks and blocking out distractions. The Inhibition of a Recent Distractor (IRD) Task examines this selection process by exploring how inhibiting distractors influences subsequent eye movements towards an object in the visual environment. In a series of experiments, research by Crawford et al. (2005) demonstrated a delayed response to a target appearing at the location that was previously occupied by a distractor, demonstrating a legacy inhibition exerted by the distractor on the spatial location of the upcoming target. This study aimed to replicate this effect and to investigate any potential constraints when multiple distractors are presented. Exploring whether the effect is observed in more ecologically relevant scenarios with multiple distractors is crucial for assessing the extent to which it can be applied to a broader range of environments. Experiment 1 successfully replicated the effect, showing a significant IRD effect only with a single distractor. Experiments 2-5 explored a number of possible explanations for this phenomenon.",
author = "Ellie Smith and Trevor Crawford",
year = "2024",
month = may,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-024-06846-3",
language = "English",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor

T2 - Singleton vs multiple distractors

AU - Smith, Ellie

AU - Crawford, Trevor

PY - 2024/5/31

Y1 - 2024/5/31

N2 - In the complex interplay between sensory and cognitive processes, the brain must sift through a flood of sensory data to pinpoint relevant signals. This selective mechanism is crucial for the effective control of behaviour, by allowing organisms to focus on important tasks and blocking out distractions. The Inhibition of a Recent Distractor (IRD) Task examines this selection process by exploring how inhibiting distractors influences subsequent eye movements towards an object in the visual environment. In a series of experiments, research by Crawford et al. (2005) demonstrated a delayed response to a target appearing at the location that was previously occupied by a distractor, demonstrating a legacy inhibition exerted by the distractor on the spatial location of the upcoming target. This study aimed to replicate this effect and to investigate any potential constraints when multiple distractors are presented. Exploring whether the effect is observed in more ecologically relevant scenarios with multiple distractors is crucial for assessing the extent to which it can be applied to a broader range of environments. Experiment 1 successfully replicated the effect, showing a significant IRD effect only with a single distractor. Experiments 2-5 explored a number of possible explanations for this phenomenon.

AB - In the complex interplay between sensory and cognitive processes, the brain must sift through a flood of sensory data to pinpoint relevant signals. This selective mechanism is crucial for the effective control of behaviour, by allowing organisms to focus on important tasks and blocking out distractions. The Inhibition of a Recent Distractor (IRD) Task examines this selection process by exploring how inhibiting distractors influences subsequent eye movements towards an object in the visual environment. In a series of experiments, research by Crawford et al. (2005) demonstrated a delayed response to a target appearing at the location that was previously occupied by a distractor, demonstrating a legacy inhibition exerted by the distractor on the spatial location of the upcoming target. This study aimed to replicate this effect and to investigate any potential constraints when multiple distractors are presented. Exploring whether the effect is observed in more ecologically relevant scenarios with multiple distractors is crucial for assessing the extent to which it can be applied to a broader range of environments. Experiment 1 successfully replicated the effect, showing a significant IRD effect only with a single distractor. Experiments 2-5 explored a number of possible explanations for this phenomenon.

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-024-06846-3

DO - 10.1007/s00221-024-06846-3

M3 - Journal article

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

ER -