Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The intellectual roots of Sunni sectarianism in...
View graph of relations

The intellectual roots of Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan: a reply to Fuchs

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineComment/debate

Published

Standard

The intellectual roots of Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan: a reply to Fuchs. / Kapur, Saloni.
In: Global Discourse, Vol. 9, No. 4, 30.11.2019, p. 717-719.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineComment/debate

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kapur S. The intellectual roots of Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan: a reply to Fuchs. Global Discourse. 2019 Nov 30;9(4):717-719. doi: 10.1332/204378919X15718899928703

Author

Kapur, Saloni. / The intellectual roots of Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan : a reply to Fuchs. In: Global Discourse. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 717-719.

Bibtex

@article{9faa0a15efd64348ba06dd4fb02b198d,
title = "The intellectual roots of Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan: a reply to Fuchs",
abstract = "In the article {\textquoteleft}Faded Networks: The Overestimated Saudi Legacy of Anti-Shi{\textquoteright}i Sectarianism in Pakistan{\textquoteright}, Simon Wolfgang Fuchs highlights the distinction between Sunni sectarianism in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, arguing that scholars have overestimated the influence of Salafi Saudi scholars on sectarian ulama in Pakistan. Fuchs underlines the Deobandi roots of Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan to differentiate anti-Shia sentiment in South Asia from the Middle Eastern, Salafi variety. However, Fuchs overlooks the impact of the Saudi- and US-sponsored jihad in Afghanistan in the 1980s on Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan. Sunni extremists in Pakistan regularly target Ithna Ashari Shias – including ethnic Hazaras – rather than Ismaili and Bohri Shias, which is evidence for the spillover of the Saudi-Iranian rivalry into Pakistan. The continuing impact of events in Afghanistan on sectarianism in Pakistan further undermines Fuchs{\textquoteright} argument about the domestic roots of Sunni sectarianism in the latter country. Nevertheless, Fuchs{\textquoteright} emphasis on the intellectual heritage of Deobandi Sunnism and its impact on Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan provides a necessary corrective to the view that sectarian violence in the country is due solely to foreign influences.",
keywords = "Deobandi, Pakistan, Salafi, Saudi Arabia, sectarianism",
author = "Saloni Kapur",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1332/204378919X15718899928703",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "717--719",
journal = "Global Discourse",
issn = "2326-9995",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The intellectual roots of Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan

T2 - a reply to Fuchs

AU - Kapur, Saloni

PY - 2019/11/30

Y1 - 2019/11/30

N2 - In the article ‘Faded Networks: The Overestimated Saudi Legacy of Anti-Shi’i Sectarianism in Pakistan’, Simon Wolfgang Fuchs highlights the distinction between Sunni sectarianism in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, arguing that scholars have overestimated the influence of Salafi Saudi scholars on sectarian ulama in Pakistan. Fuchs underlines the Deobandi roots of Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan to differentiate anti-Shia sentiment in South Asia from the Middle Eastern, Salafi variety. However, Fuchs overlooks the impact of the Saudi- and US-sponsored jihad in Afghanistan in the 1980s on Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan. Sunni extremists in Pakistan regularly target Ithna Ashari Shias – including ethnic Hazaras – rather than Ismaili and Bohri Shias, which is evidence for the spillover of the Saudi-Iranian rivalry into Pakistan. The continuing impact of events in Afghanistan on sectarianism in Pakistan further undermines Fuchs’ argument about the domestic roots of Sunni sectarianism in the latter country. Nevertheless, Fuchs’ emphasis on the intellectual heritage of Deobandi Sunnism and its impact on Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan provides a necessary corrective to the view that sectarian violence in the country is due solely to foreign influences.

AB - In the article ‘Faded Networks: The Overestimated Saudi Legacy of Anti-Shi’i Sectarianism in Pakistan’, Simon Wolfgang Fuchs highlights the distinction between Sunni sectarianism in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, arguing that scholars have overestimated the influence of Salafi Saudi scholars on sectarian ulama in Pakistan. Fuchs underlines the Deobandi roots of Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan to differentiate anti-Shia sentiment in South Asia from the Middle Eastern, Salafi variety. However, Fuchs overlooks the impact of the Saudi- and US-sponsored jihad in Afghanistan in the 1980s on Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan. Sunni extremists in Pakistan regularly target Ithna Ashari Shias – including ethnic Hazaras – rather than Ismaili and Bohri Shias, which is evidence for the spillover of the Saudi-Iranian rivalry into Pakistan. The continuing impact of events in Afghanistan on sectarianism in Pakistan further undermines Fuchs’ argument about the domestic roots of Sunni sectarianism in the latter country. Nevertheless, Fuchs’ emphasis on the intellectual heritage of Deobandi Sunnism and its impact on Sunni sectarianism in Pakistan provides a necessary corrective to the view that sectarian violence in the country is due solely to foreign influences.

KW - Deobandi

KW - Pakistan

KW - Salafi

KW - Saudi Arabia

KW - sectarianism

U2 - 10.1332/204378919X15718899928703

DO - 10.1332/204378919X15718899928703

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 9

SP - 717

EP - 719

JO - Global Discourse

JF - Global Discourse

SN - 2326-9995

IS - 4

ER -