Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The limits of the European Union's normative my...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The limits of the European Union's normative myth in Armenia and Georgia

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter

Published

Standard

The limits of the European Union's normative myth in Armenia and Georgia. / Maass, Anna Sophie.
Democracy Promotion and the Normative Power Europe Framework: The European Union in South Eastern Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. ed. / Marek Neuman. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. p. 99-117.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter

Harvard

Maass, AS 2018, The limits of the European Union's normative myth in Armenia and Georgia. in M Neuman (ed.), Democracy Promotion and the Normative Power Europe Framework: The European Union in South Eastern Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92690-2_6

APA

Maass, A. S. (2018). The limits of the European Union's normative myth in Armenia and Georgia. In M. Neuman (Ed.), Democracy Promotion and the Normative Power Europe Framework: The European Union in South Eastern Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia (pp. 99-117). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92690-2_6

Vancouver

Maass AS. The limits of the European Union's normative myth in Armenia and Georgia. In Neuman M, editor, Democracy Promotion and the Normative Power Europe Framework: The European Union in South Eastern Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2018. p. 99-117 Epub 2018 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92690-2_6

Author

Maass, Anna Sophie. / The limits of the European Union's normative myth in Armenia and Georgia. Democracy Promotion and the Normative Power Europe Framework: The European Union in South Eastern Europe, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. editor / Marek Neuman. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018. pp. 99-117

Bibtex

@inbook{412f246236db4cbe949a57c03e3b4915,
title = "The limits of the European Union's normative myth in Armenia and Georgia",
abstract = "This chapter seeks to identify several endogenous and exogenous factors that hampered the EU{\textquoteright}s democracy promotion in Georgia and Armenia between September 2013 and December 2015. Georgia and Armenia have reacted differently to the EU{\textquoteright}s intended norm diffusion. While Georgia adopted some of the EU{\textquoteright}s reforms for the price of future integration with the EU, Armenia chose to align with Russia, which was exemplified by its accession to the Eurasian Union. These divergent integrative approaches demonstrate that the effect of the EU{\textquoteright}s normative power is challenged by several factors.",
author = "Maass, {Anna Sophie}",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-92690-2_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319926896",
pages = "99--117",
editor = "Neuman, {Marek }",
booktitle = "Democracy Promotion and the Normative Power Europe Framework",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - The limits of the European Union's normative myth in Armenia and Georgia

AU - Maass, Anna Sophie

PY - 2018/7/20

Y1 - 2018/7/20

N2 - This chapter seeks to identify several endogenous and exogenous factors that hampered the EU’s democracy promotion in Georgia and Armenia between September 2013 and December 2015. Georgia and Armenia have reacted differently to the EU’s intended norm diffusion. While Georgia adopted some of the EU’s reforms for the price of future integration with the EU, Armenia chose to align with Russia, which was exemplified by its accession to the Eurasian Union. These divergent integrative approaches demonstrate that the effect of the EU’s normative power is challenged by several factors.

AB - This chapter seeks to identify several endogenous and exogenous factors that hampered the EU’s democracy promotion in Georgia and Armenia between September 2013 and December 2015. Georgia and Armenia have reacted differently to the EU’s intended norm diffusion. While Georgia adopted some of the EU’s reforms for the price of future integration with the EU, Armenia chose to align with Russia, which was exemplified by its accession to the Eurasian Union. These divergent integrative approaches demonstrate that the effect of the EU’s normative power is challenged by several factors.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-92690-2_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-92690-2_6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85063561679

SN - 9783319926896

SP - 99

EP - 117

BT - Democracy Promotion and the Normative Power Europe Framework

A2 - Neuman, Marek

PB - Springer International Publishing

CY - Cham

ER -