Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The matching problem for evolutionary psychiatry

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The matching problem for evolutionary psychiatry

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The matching problem for evolutionary psychiatry. / Maung, H.H.
In: Philosophical Psychology, Vol. 38, No. 6, 01.07.2025, p. 2761-2787.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Maung, HH 2025, 'The matching problem for evolutionary psychiatry', Philosophical Psychology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 2761-2787. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2354437

APA

Vancouver

Maung HH. The matching problem for evolutionary psychiatry. Philosophical Psychology. 2025 Jul 1;38(6):2761-2787. Epub 2024 May 15. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2024.2354437

Author

Maung, H.H. / The matching problem for evolutionary psychiatry. In: Philosophical Psychology. 2025 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 2761-2787.

Bibtex

@article{07fba9e5206743889e0011f8a9aabb23,
title = "The matching problem for evolutionary psychiatry",
abstract = "Evolutionary psychiatry suggests that mental disorders can be explained in evolutionary terms (a) as failures of psychological mechanisms to produce the adaptive effects for which they were naturally selected, (b) as mismatches between naturally selected psychological mechanisms and contemporary environmental pressures, or (c) as naturally selected psychological mechanisms whose effects continue to be adaptive. In this paper, I present a philosophical critique of evolutionary psychiatry that draws on Subrena Smith{\textquoteright}s matching problem for evolutionary psychology. For evolutionary psychiatry hypotheses to be empirically supported, proponents of evolutionary psychiatry must demonstrate (1) that the contemporary psychological mechanisms involved in mental disorders resemble the psychological mechanisms of our evolutionary ancestors, (2) that the contemporary psychological mechanisms are phylogenetically descended from the ancestral psychological mechanisms, and (3) that the ancestral psychological mechanisms were naturally selected because their effects had adaptive benefits. However, for many mental disorders, evolutionary psychiatry lacks the methodological resources to demonstrate these conditions. Therefore, many evolutionary psychiatry hypotheses are empirically untestable and remain indefinitely underdetermined by data.",
keywords = "Evolutionary psychiatry, matching problem, mental disorder, philosophy of biology",
author = "H.H. Maung",
year = "2025",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09515089.2024.2354437",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "2761--2787",
journal = "Philosophical Psychology",
issn = "0951-5089",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The matching problem for evolutionary psychiatry

AU - Maung, H.H.

PY - 2025/7/1

Y1 - 2025/7/1

N2 - Evolutionary psychiatry suggests that mental disorders can be explained in evolutionary terms (a) as failures of psychological mechanisms to produce the adaptive effects for which they were naturally selected, (b) as mismatches between naturally selected psychological mechanisms and contemporary environmental pressures, or (c) as naturally selected psychological mechanisms whose effects continue to be adaptive. In this paper, I present a philosophical critique of evolutionary psychiatry that draws on Subrena Smith’s matching problem for evolutionary psychology. For evolutionary psychiatry hypotheses to be empirically supported, proponents of evolutionary psychiatry must demonstrate (1) that the contemporary psychological mechanisms involved in mental disorders resemble the psychological mechanisms of our evolutionary ancestors, (2) that the contemporary psychological mechanisms are phylogenetically descended from the ancestral psychological mechanisms, and (3) that the ancestral psychological mechanisms were naturally selected because their effects had adaptive benefits. However, for many mental disorders, evolutionary psychiatry lacks the methodological resources to demonstrate these conditions. Therefore, many evolutionary psychiatry hypotheses are empirically untestable and remain indefinitely underdetermined by data.

AB - Evolutionary psychiatry suggests that mental disorders can be explained in evolutionary terms (a) as failures of psychological mechanisms to produce the adaptive effects for which they were naturally selected, (b) as mismatches between naturally selected psychological mechanisms and contemporary environmental pressures, or (c) as naturally selected psychological mechanisms whose effects continue to be adaptive. In this paper, I present a philosophical critique of evolutionary psychiatry that draws on Subrena Smith’s matching problem for evolutionary psychology. For evolutionary psychiatry hypotheses to be empirically supported, proponents of evolutionary psychiatry must demonstrate (1) that the contemporary psychological mechanisms involved in mental disorders resemble the psychological mechanisms of our evolutionary ancestors, (2) that the contemporary psychological mechanisms are phylogenetically descended from the ancestral psychological mechanisms, and (3) that the ancestral psychological mechanisms were naturally selected because their effects had adaptive benefits. However, for many mental disorders, evolutionary psychiatry lacks the methodological resources to demonstrate these conditions. Therefore, many evolutionary psychiatry hypotheses are empirically untestable and remain indefinitely underdetermined by data.

KW - Evolutionary psychiatry

KW - matching problem

KW - mental disorder

KW - philosophy of biology

U2 - 10.1080/09515089.2024.2354437

DO - 10.1080/09515089.2024.2354437

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 2761

EP - 2787

JO - Philosophical Psychology

JF - Philosophical Psychology

SN - 0951-5089

IS - 6

ER -