Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The mental health and well-being of adolescents...

Electronic data

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 219 KB, fulltext

    Available under license: CC BY

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 254 KB, fulltext

    Available under license: CC BY

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The mental health and well-being of adolescents with/without intellectual disability in the UK

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The mental health and well-being of adolescents with/without intellectual disability in the UK. / Emerson, E; Totsika, V; Hatton, C et al.
In: Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, Vol. 32, e67, 31.12.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Emerson E, Totsika V, Hatton C, Hastings RP. The mental health and well-being of adolescents with/without intellectual disability in the UK. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences. 2023 Dec 31;32:e67. Epub 2023 Nov 30. doi: 10.1017/s204579602300080x

Author

Emerson, E ; Totsika, V ; Hatton, C et al. / The mental health and well-being of adolescents with/without intellectual disability in the UK. In: Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences. 2023 ; Vol. 32.

Bibtex

@article{f00d6bc59d704e8fb090b58b97aa9d16,
title = "The mental health and well-being of adolescents with/without intellectual disability in the UK",
abstract = "AimsTo estimate the self-reported and parent-reported mental well-being of adolescents (aged 14 and 17) with/without intellectual disability in a sample of young people representative of the UK population.MethodsSecondary analysis of data collected in Waves 6 and 7 of the UK's Millennium Cohort Study. The analytic sample consisted of 10,838 adolescent respondents at age 14 (361 with intellectual disability and 10,477 without) and 9,408 adolescent respondents at age 17 (292 with intellectual disability and 9,116 without).ResultsParental reports of adolescent problems on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) indicated that adolescents with intellectual disability at ages 14 and 17 were more likely to have problems than those without intellectual disability across all SDQ domains. Adolescent self-report data at age 17 indicated that adolescents with intellectual disability were more likely to (self)-report that they had problems than those without intellectual disability on all but one SDQ domain. The magnitude of relative inequality between those with and without intellectual disability was consistently lower for self-report than parental report. On indicators of depression, mental well-being, self-harm, positive mental health, happiness and general psychological distress at ages 14 and 17, we found no self-reported group differences between adolescents with and without intellectual disability.ConclusionsFurther research is needed to understand: (1) why the magnitude of mental health inequalities between those with and without intellectual disability on the SDQ may be dependent on the identity of the informant; and (2) whether such differences are also apparent for other measures of mental health or well-being.",
keywords = "Adolescence, Mental health, Inequalities, Well-being, Intellectual Disability, Humans, Cohort Studies, Mental Health, Mental Disorders, Adolescent, Self Report, Surveys and Questionnaires, United Kingdom",
author = "E Emerson and V Totsika and C Hatton and Hastings, {R P}",
year = "2023",
month = dec,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1017/s204579602300080x",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
journal = "Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences",
issn = "2045-7960",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The mental health and well-being of adolescents with/without intellectual disability in the UK

AU - Emerson, E

AU - Totsika, V

AU - Hatton, C

AU - Hastings, R P

PY - 2023/12/31

Y1 - 2023/12/31

N2 - AimsTo estimate the self-reported and parent-reported mental well-being of adolescents (aged 14 and 17) with/without intellectual disability in a sample of young people representative of the UK population.MethodsSecondary analysis of data collected in Waves 6 and 7 of the UK's Millennium Cohort Study. The analytic sample consisted of 10,838 adolescent respondents at age 14 (361 with intellectual disability and 10,477 without) and 9,408 adolescent respondents at age 17 (292 with intellectual disability and 9,116 without).ResultsParental reports of adolescent problems on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) indicated that adolescents with intellectual disability at ages 14 and 17 were more likely to have problems than those without intellectual disability across all SDQ domains. Adolescent self-report data at age 17 indicated that adolescents with intellectual disability were more likely to (self)-report that they had problems than those without intellectual disability on all but one SDQ domain. The magnitude of relative inequality between those with and without intellectual disability was consistently lower for self-report than parental report. On indicators of depression, mental well-being, self-harm, positive mental health, happiness and general psychological distress at ages 14 and 17, we found no self-reported group differences between adolescents with and without intellectual disability.ConclusionsFurther research is needed to understand: (1) why the magnitude of mental health inequalities between those with and without intellectual disability on the SDQ may be dependent on the identity of the informant; and (2) whether such differences are also apparent for other measures of mental health or well-being.

AB - AimsTo estimate the self-reported and parent-reported mental well-being of adolescents (aged 14 and 17) with/without intellectual disability in a sample of young people representative of the UK population.MethodsSecondary analysis of data collected in Waves 6 and 7 of the UK's Millennium Cohort Study. The analytic sample consisted of 10,838 adolescent respondents at age 14 (361 with intellectual disability and 10,477 without) and 9,408 adolescent respondents at age 17 (292 with intellectual disability and 9,116 without).ResultsParental reports of adolescent problems on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) indicated that adolescents with intellectual disability at ages 14 and 17 were more likely to have problems than those without intellectual disability across all SDQ domains. Adolescent self-report data at age 17 indicated that adolescents with intellectual disability were more likely to (self)-report that they had problems than those without intellectual disability on all but one SDQ domain. The magnitude of relative inequality between those with and without intellectual disability was consistently lower for self-report than parental report. On indicators of depression, mental well-being, self-harm, positive mental health, happiness and general psychological distress at ages 14 and 17, we found no self-reported group differences between adolescents with and without intellectual disability.ConclusionsFurther research is needed to understand: (1) why the magnitude of mental health inequalities between those with and without intellectual disability on the SDQ may be dependent on the identity of the informant; and (2) whether such differences are also apparent for other measures of mental health or well-being.

KW - Adolescence

KW - Mental health

KW - Inequalities

KW - Well-being

KW - Intellectual Disability

KW - Humans

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Mental Health

KW - Mental Disorders

KW - Adolescent

KW - Self Report

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - United Kingdom

U2 - 10.1017/s204579602300080x

DO - 10.1017/s204579602300080x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

JO - Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences

JF - Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences

SN - 2045-7960

M1 - e67

ER -