Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The metalinguistics of offence in (British) Eng...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English: A corpus-based metapragmatic approach

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English: A corpus-based metapragmatic approach. / Culpeper, Jonathan; Haugh, Michael.
In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, Vol. 9, No. 2, 31.08.2021, p. 185-214.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Culpeper, J & Haugh, M 2021, 'The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English: A corpus-based metapragmatic approach', Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00035.cul

APA

Vancouver

Culpeper J, Haugh M. The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English: A corpus-based metapragmatic approach. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. 2021 Aug 31;9(2):185-214. Epub 2020 May 29. doi: 10.1075/jlac.00035.cul

Author

Culpeper, Jonathan ; Haugh, Michael. / The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English : A corpus-based metapragmatic approach. In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. 2021 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 185-214.

Bibtex

@article{a80bb4df82ad4be8afa803f330e2be34,
title = "The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English: A corpus-based metapragmatic approach",
abstract = "Offence is a central concept in impoliteness, aggression and conflict research, yet has received only passing mention in definitions of impoliteness and related concepts. Janicki (2017) argues that impoliteness and language aggression scholars are needlessly worried about definitions. We use Janicki{\textquoteright}s (2017) work as a spring-board into a discussion of definitions of impolite or taboo language, airing potential problems and suggesting that the study of metalanguage offers at least a partial solution. We report a study of the metalanguage of OFFENCE in British English, and briefly examine whether there are any differences in Australian English, using SketchEngine to interrogate data in the two-billion word Oxford English Corpus. In so doing, we tease out different uses of the term offensive, and show that concepts such as OFFENCE are coloured by the specific linguistic and cultural contexts in which they appear. We conclude that while corpus-based metalinguistic analyses cannot completely eliminate the problem of definitional infinite regress, they do, however, offer an empirically grounded way of defining words that allows us to move beyond the intuitions of individual researchers.",
keywords = "Impoliteness, offence, definition, metalanguage, metapragmatics, corpora, British English, Australian English",
author = "Jonathan Culpeper and Michael Haugh",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1075/jlac.00035.cul",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "185--214",
journal = "Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict",
issn = "2213-1272",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English

T2 - A corpus-based metapragmatic approach

AU - Culpeper, Jonathan

AU - Haugh, Michael

PY - 2021/8/31

Y1 - 2021/8/31

N2 - Offence is a central concept in impoliteness, aggression and conflict research, yet has received only passing mention in definitions of impoliteness and related concepts. Janicki (2017) argues that impoliteness and language aggression scholars are needlessly worried about definitions. We use Janicki’s (2017) work as a spring-board into a discussion of definitions of impolite or taboo language, airing potential problems and suggesting that the study of metalanguage offers at least a partial solution. We report a study of the metalanguage of OFFENCE in British English, and briefly examine whether there are any differences in Australian English, using SketchEngine to interrogate data in the two-billion word Oxford English Corpus. In so doing, we tease out different uses of the term offensive, and show that concepts such as OFFENCE are coloured by the specific linguistic and cultural contexts in which they appear. We conclude that while corpus-based metalinguistic analyses cannot completely eliminate the problem of definitional infinite regress, they do, however, offer an empirically grounded way of defining words that allows us to move beyond the intuitions of individual researchers.

AB - Offence is a central concept in impoliteness, aggression and conflict research, yet has received only passing mention in definitions of impoliteness and related concepts. Janicki (2017) argues that impoliteness and language aggression scholars are needlessly worried about definitions. We use Janicki’s (2017) work as a spring-board into a discussion of definitions of impolite or taboo language, airing potential problems and suggesting that the study of metalanguage offers at least a partial solution. We report a study of the metalanguage of OFFENCE in British English, and briefly examine whether there are any differences in Australian English, using SketchEngine to interrogate data in the two-billion word Oxford English Corpus. In so doing, we tease out different uses of the term offensive, and show that concepts such as OFFENCE are coloured by the specific linguistic and cultural contexts in which they appear. We conclude that while corpus-based metalinguistic analyses cannot completely eliminate the problem of definitional infinite regress, they do, however, offer an empirically grounded way of defining words that allows us to move beyond the intuitions of individual researchers.

KW - Impoliteness

KW - offence

KW - definition

KW - metalanguage

KW - metapragmatics

KW - corpora

KW - British English

KW - Australian English

U2 - 10.1075/jlac.00035.cul

DO - 10.1075/jlac.00035.cul

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 185

EP - 214

JO - Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict

JF - Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict

SN - 2213-1272

IS - 2

ER -