Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The moral and political economy of producers an...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

The moral and political economy of producers and consumers

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

The moral and political economy of producers and consumers. / Fleetwood, Steve.
Lancaster University: The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, 2006. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Fleetwood, S 2006 'The moral and political economy of producers and consumers' Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series, The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, Lancaster University.

APA

Fleetwood, S. (2006). The moral and political economy of producers and consumers. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series). The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology.

Vancouver

Fleetwood S. The moral and political economy of producers and consumers. Lancaster University: The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology. 2006. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Author

Fleetwood, Steve. / The moral and political economy of producers and consumers. Lancaster University : The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, 2006. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{8a1e40da4ca042a7b06ec91e92618247,
title = "The moral and political economy of producers and consumers",
abstract = "There appears to be a kind of master discourse of consumption, consumers and consumer society, generated and sustained, primarily, by discourses of consumer sovereignty, and the customer-driven firm. To the extent that we, as consumers, accept (all or some of) this master discourse then we are partly responsible for the negative consequences that befall many workers producing the goods and services we consume - e.g. we often see relatively inexpensive commodities in terms of a 'bargain' rather than the result of someone else's low pay. There is, however, a contradiction at work because we often do not accept all (or some) of this master discourse. We often do care about the plight of those who produce the goods and services we consume. The problem is the master discourse does nothing to encourage these ethical predispositions or to challenge us to probe our ignorance. The aim of this paper is to explore this contradiction. After reminding ourselves, in part one, of some fundamental facts of political economic life, part two introduces moral economy. Part three uses this political and moral economic perspective to focus attention on the negative consequences that can arise for workers, when consumers accept (all or some of) this fetishized master discourse. Part four explores the contradiction by considering cases where consumers do care about the plight of those who produce the goods and services they consume.",
author = "Steve Fleetwood",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
series = "Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - The moral and political economy of producers and consumers

AU - Fleetwood, Steve

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - There appears to be a kind of master discourse of consumption, consumers and consumer society, generated and sustained, primarily, by discourses of consumer sovereignty, and the customer-driven firm. To the extent that we, as consumers, accept (all or some of) this master discourse then we are partly responsible for the negative consequences that befall many workers producing the goods and services we consume - e.g. we often see relatively inexpensive commodities in terms of a 'bargain' rather than the result of someone else's low pay. There is, however, a contradiction at work because we often do not accept all (or some) of this master discourse. We often do care about the plight of those who produce the goods and services we consume. The problem is the master discourse does nothing to encourage these ethical predispositions or to challenge us to probe our ignorance. The aim of this paper is to explore this contradiction. After reminding ourselves, in part one, of some fundamental facts of political economic life, part two introduces moral economy. Part three uses this political and moral economic perspective to focus attention on the negative consequences that can arise for workers, when consumers accept (all or some of) this fetishized master discourse. Part four explores the contradiction by considering cases where consumers do care about the plight of those who produce the goods and services they consume.

AB - There appears to be a kind of master discourse of consumption, consumers and consumer society, generated and sustained, primarily, by discourses of consumer sovereignty, and the customer-driven firm. To the extent that we, as consumers, accept (all or some of) this master discourse then we are partly responsible for the negative consequences that befall many workers producing the goods and services we consume - e.g. we often see relatively inexpensive commodities in terms of a 'bargain' rather than the result of someone else's low pay. There is, however, a contradiction at work because we often do not accept all (or some) of this master discourse. We often do care about the plight of those who produce the goods and services we consume. The problem is the master discourse does nothing to encourage these ethical predispositions or to challenge us to probe our ignorance. The aim of this paper is to explore this contradiction. After reminding ourselves, in part one, of some fundamental facts of political economic life, part two introduces moral economy. Part three uses this political and moral economic perspective to focus attention on the negative consequences that can arise for workers, when consumers accept (all or some of) this fetishized master discourse. Part four explores the contradiction by considering cases where consumers do care about the plight of those who produce the goods and services they consume.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series

BT - The moral and political economy of producers and consumers

PB - The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology

CY - Lancaster University

ER -