Rights statement: ©American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/emo0000671
Accepted author manuscript, 140 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The need for change
T2 - Understanding emotion regulation antecedents and consequences using ecological momentary assessment
AU - Colombo, D.
AU - Fernández-Álvarez, J.
AU - Suso-Ribera, C.
AU - Cipresso, P.
AU - Valev, H.
AU - Leufkens, T.
AU - Sas, C.
AU - Garcia-Palacios, A.
AU - Riva, G.
AU - Botella, C.
N1 - ©American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/emo0000671
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - In recent decades, emotion regulation (ER) has been one of the most widely studied constructs within the psychological field. Nevertheless, laboratory experiments and retrospective assessments have been the 2 most common strands of ER research; thus, leaving open several crucial questions about ER antecedents and consequences in daily life. Beyond traditional methods, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has the potential to capture ER dynamics during the flow of daily experiences, in real-life settings and through repeated measurements. Here, we discuss what we currently know about ER antecedents and consequences. We will compare findings from previous literature to findings from EMA studies, pointing out both similarities and differences, as well as questions that can be answered better with the EMA approach.
AB - In recent decades, emotion regulation (ER) has been one of the most widely studied constructs within the psychological field. Nevertheless, laboratory experiments and retrospective assessments have been the 2 most common strands of ER research; thus, leaving open several crucial questions about ER antecedents and consequences in daily life. Beyond traditional methods, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has the potential to capture ER dynamics during the flow of daily experiences, in real-life settings and through repeated measurements. Here, we discuss what we currently know about ER antecedents and consequences. We will compare findings from previous literature to findings from EMA studies, pointing out both similarities and differences, as well as questions that can be answered better with the EMA approach.
KW - emotion regulation
KW - ecological momentary assessment
KW - emotion regulation antecedents
KW - emotion regulation consequences
U2 - 10.1037/emo0000671
DO - 10.1037/emo0000671
M3 - Journal article
VL - 20
SP - 30
EP - 36
JO - Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
JF - Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
IS - 1
ER -