Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Nkrumah Factor

Electronic data

  • Wyss FINAL

    Accepted author manuscript, 407 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 30/06/25

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The Nkrumah Factor: The Strategic Alignment of Early Postcolonial Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Nkrumah Factor: The Strategic Alignment of Early Postcolonial Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria. / Wyss, Marco.
In: English Historical Review, Vol. 138, No. 592, 30.06.2023, p. 591-619.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wyss M. The Nkrumah Factor: The Strategic Alignment of Early Postcolonial Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria. English Historical Review. 2023 Jun 30;138(592):591-619. doi: 10.1093/ehr/cead106

Author

Wyss, Marco. / The Nkrumah Factor : The Strategic Alignment of Early Postcolonial Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria. In: English Historical Review. 2023 ; Vol. 138, No. 592. pp. 591-619.

Bibtex

@article{d6fe5c35a5384279bd451d20a16f4867,
title = "The Nkrumah Factor: The Strategic Alignment of Early Postcolonial C{\^o}te d{\textquoteright}Ivoire and Nigeria",
abstract = "In stark contrast to the Nigerian Civil War, when the Ivorian President F{\'e}lix Houphou{\"e}t-Boigny supported the secessionist Biafran Republic against the Federal Military Government, early postcolonial relations between C{\^o}te d{\textquoteright}Ivoire and Nigeria were close. This {\textquoteleft}entente cordiale{\textquoteright} was underpinned by the friendship of Houphou{\"e}t-Boigny and the Nigerian Prime Minister Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, who were both anti-communist, pro-western, capitalist, and in favour of African co-operation instead of integration. Yet it was Ghana{\textquoteright}s Kwame Nkrumah who, through his criticism and alleged subversive machinations against C{\^o}te d{\textquoteright}Ivoire and Nigeria, gave the two countries their common purpose. Focusing, unlike previous scholarship, on the military and strategic responses of Abidjan and Lagos to Accra, and based on multi-archival research, this article argues that the Nkrumah factor brought about a strategic alignment between C{\^o}te d{\textquoteright}Ivoire and Nigeria. It also shows, however, that despite a common threat assessment, domestic politics had a decisive and diverging impact on the foreign and security policies of the two states, and that regional and colonial legacies turned out to have a more significant impact on early postcolonial Africa than did the Cold War. The article sheds light on African agency, while simultaneously going beyond and, more significantly, offering an alternative perspective to the Cold War-driven historiography of early postcolonial Africa, and its tendency to focus on external rather than African actors.",
author = "Marco Wyss",
year = "2023",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1093/ehr/cead106",
language = "English",
volume = "138",
pages = "591--619",
journal = "English Historical Review",
issn = "0013-8266",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "592",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Nkrumah Factor

T2 - The Strategic Alignment of Early Postcolonial Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria

AU - Wyss, Marco

PY - 2023/6/30

Y1 - 2023/6/30

N2 - In stark contrast to the Nigerian Civil War, when the Ivorian President Félix Houphouët-Boigny supported the secessionist Biafran Republic against the Federal Military Government, early postcolonial relations between Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria were close. This ‘entente cordiale’ was underpinned by the friendship of Houphouët-Boigny and the Nigerian Prime Minister Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, who were both anti-communist, pro-western, capitalist, and in favour of African co-operation instead of integration. Yet it was Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah who, through his criticism and alleged subversive machinations against Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria, gave the two countries their common purpose. Focusing, unlike previous scholarship, on the military and strategic responses of Abidjan and Lagos to Accra, and based on multi-archival research, this article argues that the Nkrumah factor brought about a strategic alignment between Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria. It also shows, however, that despite a common threat assessment, domestic politics had a decisive and diverging impact on the foreign and security policies of the two states, and that regional and colonial legacies turned out to have a more significant impact on early postcolonial Africa than did the Cold War. The article sheds light on African agency, while simultaneously going beyond and, more significantly, offering an alternative perspective to the Cold War-driven historiography of early postcolonial Africa, and its tendency to focus on external rather than African actors.

AB - In stark contrast to the Nigerian Civil War, when the Ivorian President Félix Houphouët-Boigny supported the secessionist Biafran Republic against the Federal Military Government, early postcolonial relations between Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria were close. This ‘entente cordiale’ was underpinned by the friendship of Houphouët-Boigny and the Nigerian Prime Minister Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, who were both anti-communist, pro-western, capitalist, and in favour of African co-operation instead of integration. Yet it was Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah who, through his criticism and alleged subversive machinations against Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria, gave the two countries their common purpose. Focusing, unlike previous scholarship, on the military and strategic responses of Abidjan and Lagos to Accra, and based on multi-archival research, this article argues that the Nkrumah factor brought about a strategic alignment between Côte d’Ivoire and Nigeria. It also shows, however, that despite a common threat assessment, domestic politics had a decisive and diverging impact on the foreign and security policies of the two states, and that regional and colonial legacies turned out to have a more significant impact on early postcolonial Africa than did the Cold War. The article sheds light on African agency, while simultaneously going beyond and, more significantly, offering an alternative perspective to the Cold War-driven historiography of early postcolonial Africa, and its tendency to focus on external rather than African actors.

U2 - 10.1093/ehr/cead106

DO - 10.1093/ehr/cead106

M3 - Journal article

VL - 138

SP - 591

EP - 619

JO - English Historical Review

JF - English Historical Review

SN - 0013-8266

IS - 592

ER -