Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘The opportunity to have their say’?

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

‘The opportunity to have their say’?: Identifying mechanisms of community engagement in local alcohol decision-making

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

‘The opportunity to have their say’? Identifying mechanisms of community engagement in local alcohol decision-making. / Reynolds, J.; McGrath, M.; Halliday, E.; Ogden, M.; Hare, S.; Smolar, M.; Lafortune, L.; Lock, K.; Popay, J.; Cook, P.; Egan, M.

In: International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol. 85, 102909, 01.11.2020.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Reynolds, J, McGrath, M, Halliday, E, Ogden, M, Hare, S, Smolar, M, Lafortune, L, Lock, K, Popay, J, Cook, P & Egan, M 2020, '‘The opportunity to have their say’? Identifying mechanisms of community engagement in local alcohol decision-making', International Journal of Drug Policy, vol. 85, 102909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102909

APA

Reynolds, J., McGrath, M., Halliday, E., Ogden, M., Hare, S., Smolar, M., Lafortune, L., Lock, K., Popay, J., Cook, P., & Egan, M. (2020). ‘The opportunity to have their say’? Identifying mechanisms of community engagement in local alcohol decision-making. International Journal of Drug Policy, 85, [102909]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102909

Vancouver

Reynolds J, McGrath M, Halliday E, Ogden M, Hare S, Smolar M et al. ‘The opportunity to have their say’? Identifying mechanisms of community engagement in local alcohol decision-making. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2020 Nov 1;85. 102909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102909

Author

Reynolds, J. ; McGrath, M. ; Halliday, E. ; Ogden, M. ; Hare, S. ; Smolar, M. ; Lafortune, L. ; Lock, K. ; Popay, J. ; Cook, P. ; Egan, M. / ‘The opportunity to have their say’? Identifying mechanisms of community engagement in local alcohol decision-making. In: International Journal of Drug Policy. 2020 ; Vol. 85.

Bibtex

@article{0d6534ee8b7b4e3bb4b1fe9abf3bf728,
title = "{\textquoteleft}The opportunity to have their say{\textquoteright}?: Identifying mechanisms of community engagement in local alcohol decision-making",
abstract = "Background: Engaging the community in decisions-making is recognised as important for improving public health, and is recommended in global alcohol strategies, and in national policies on controlling alcohol availability. Yet there is little understanding of how to engage communities to influence decision-making to help reduce alcohol-related harms. We sought to identify and understand mechanisms of community engagement in decision-making concerning the local alcohol environment in England. Methods: We conducted case studies in three local government areas in England in 2018, purposively selected for examples of community engagement in decisions affecting the local alcohol environment. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with residents, workers, local politicians and local government practitioners, and analysed documents linked to engagement and alcohol decision-making. Results: Four rationales for engaging the community in decision-making affecting the alcohol environment were identified: i) as part of statutory decision-making processes; ii) to develop new policies; iii) as representation on committees; and iv) occurring through relationship building. Many of the examples related to alcohol licensing processes, but also local economy and community safety decision-making. The impact of community inputs on decisions was often not clear, but there were a few instances of engagement influencing the process and outcome of decision-making relating to the alcohol environment. Conclusions: While influencing statutory licensing decision-making is challenging, community experiences of alcohol-related harms can be valuable {\textquoteleft}evidence{\textquoteright} to support new licensing policies. Informal relationship-building between communities and local government is also beneficial for sharing information about alcohol-related harms and to facilitate future engagement. However, care must be taken to balance the different interests among diverse community actors relating to the local alcohol environment, and extra support is needed for those with least capacity to engage but who face more burden of alcohol-related harms, to avoid compounding existing inequalities. {\textcopyright} 2020",
keywords = "Alcohol, Community, Community engagement, Licensing, Local government, Participation, Policy, UK",
author = "J. Reynolds and M. McGrath and E. Halliday and M. Ogden and S. Hare and M. Smolar and L. Lafortune and K. Lock and J. Popay and P. Cook and M. Egan",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102909",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
journal = "International Journal of Drug Policy",
issn = "0955-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘The opportunity to have their say’?

T2 - Identifying mechanisms of community engagement in local alcohol decision-making

AU - Reynolds, J.

AU - McGrath, M.

AU - Halliday, E.

AU - Ogden, M.

AU - Hare, S.

AU - Smolar, M.

AU - Lafortune, L.

AU - Lock, K.

AU - Popay, J.

AU - Cook, P.

AU - Egan, M.

PY - 2020/11/1

Y1 - 2020/11/1

N2 - Background: Engaging the community in decisions-making is recognised as important for improving public health, and is recommended in global alcohol strategies, and in national policies on controlling alcohol availability. Yet there is little understanding of how to engage communities to influence decision-making to help reduce alcohol-related harms. We sought to identify and understand mechanisms of community engagement in decision-making concerning the local alcohol environment in England. Methods: We conducted case studies in three local government areas in England in 2018, purposively selected for examples of community engagement in decisions affecting the local alcohol environment. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with residents, workers, local politicians and local government practitioners, and analysed documents linked to engagement and alcohol decision-making. Results: Four rationales for engaging the community in decision-making affecting the alcohol environment were identified: i) as part of statutory decision-making processes; ii) to develop new policies; iii) as representation on committees; and iv) occurring through relationship building. Many of the examples related to alcohol licensing processes, but also local economy and community safety decision-making. The impact of community inputs on decisions was often not clear, but there were a few instances of engagement influencing the process and outcome of decision-making relating to the alcohol environment. Conclusions: While influencing statutory licensing decision-making is challenging, community experiences of alcohol-related harms can be valuable ‘evidence’ to support new licensing policies. Informal relationship-building between communities and local government is also beneficial for sharing information about alcohol-related harms and to facilitate future engagement. However, care must be taken to balance the different interests among diverse community actors relating to the local alcohol environment, and extra support is needed for those with least capacity to engage but who face more burden of alcohol-related harms, to avoid compounding existing inequalities. © 2020

AB - Background: Engaging the community in decisions-making is recognised as important for improving public health, and is recommended in global alcohol strategies, and in national policies on controlling alcohol availability. Yet there is little understanding of how to engage communities to influence decision-making to help reduce alcohol-related harms. We sought to identify and understand mechanisms of community engagement in decision-making concerning the local alcohol environment in England. Methods: We conducted case studies in three local government areas in England in 2018, purposively selected for examples of community engagement in decisions affecting the local alcohol environment. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with residents, workers, local politicians and local government practitioners, and analysed documents linked to engagement and alcohol decision-making. Results: Four rationales for engaging the community in decision-making affecting the alcohol environment were identified: i) as part of statutory decision-making processes; ii) to develop new policies; iii) as representation on committees; and iv) occurring through relationship building. Many of the examples related to alcohol licensing processes, but also local economy and community safety decision-making. The impact of community inputs on decisions was often not clear, but there were a few instances of engagement influencing the process and outcome of decision-making relating to the alcohol environment. Conclusions: While influencing statutory licensing decision-making is challenging, community experiences of alcohol-related harms can be valuable ‘evidence’ to support new licensing policies. Informal relationship-building between communities and local government is also beneficial for sharing information about alcohol-related harms and to facilitate future engagement. However, care must be taken to balance the different interests among diverse community actors relating to the local alcohol environment, and extra support is needed for those with least capacity to engage but who face more burden of alcohol-related harms, to avoid compounding existing inequalities. © 2020

KW - Alcohol

KW - Community

KW - Community engagement

KW - Licensing

KW - Local government

KW - Participation

KW - Policy

KW - UK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102909

DO - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102909

M3 - Journal article

VL - 85

JO - International Journal of Drug Policy

JF - International Journal of Drug Policy

SN - 0955-3959

M1 - 102909

ER -