Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The pedestal and the pendulum

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The pedestal and the pendulum: fine art practice, research and doctorates

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The pedestal and the pendulum: fine art practice, research and doctorates. / Mottram, Judith; Rust, C.
In: Journal of Visual Art Practice, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2008, p. 133-151.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Mottram, J & Rust, C 2008, 'The pedestal and the pendulum: fine art practice, research and doctorates', Journal of Visual Art Practice, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1386/jvap.7.2.133_1

APA

Vancouver

Mottram J, Rust C. The pedestal and the pendulum: fine art practice, research and doctorates. Journal of Visual Art Practice. 2008;7(2):133-151. doi: 10.1386/jvap.7.2.133_1

Author

Mottram, Judith ; Rust, C. / The pedestal and the pendulum : fine art practice, research and doctorates. In: Journal of Visual Art Practice. 2008 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 133-151.

Bibtex

@article{0d4d1dce60d84c42bf4c3e36e2c011c3,
title = "The pedestal and the pendulum: fine art practice, research and doctorates",
abstract = "This article reports on the issues arising from the AHRC Research Review: Practice-Led Research in Art, Design and Architecture, published in February 2008 by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council. These include the continuing question of defining activity in the field, the underdeveloped scholarly infrastructure, and the nature of the contribution to knowledge made by the artefact or designed object. The article also draws upon an analysis of completed doctorates in art and design made possible by the Art & Design Index to Theses (ADIT). This earlier project, which set up a scholarly resource for the research community, enables the growth of doctoral activity in the fine art field to be measured and the range of approaches to enquiry to be evaluated. The analysis of doctoral work to date indicates the extent to which professional practice has begun to be incorporated into doctoral projects. An uncritical revisionism or relabelling of activities within the realm of professional practice and doctoral study is evident in the data consulted in the two studies, reflecting the continuing prominence of the exhibition as a means of disseminating the outcomes of creative practice.",
author = "Judith Mottram and C Rust",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1386/jvap.7.2.133_1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "133--151",
journal = "Journal of Visual Art Practice",
issn = "1470-2029",
publisher = "Intellect Publishers",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The pedestal and the pendulum

T2 - fine art practice, research and doctorates

AU - Mottram, Judith

AU - Rust, C

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This article reports on the issues arising from the AHRC Research Review: Practice-Led Research in Art, Design and Architecture, published in February 2008 by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council. These include the continuing question of defining activity in the field, the underdeveloped scholarly infrastructure, and the nature of the contribution to knowledge made by the artefact or designed object. The article also draws upon an analysis of completed doctorates in art and design made possible by the Art & Design Index to Theses (ADIT). This earlier project, which set up a scholarly resource for the research community, enables the growth of doctoral activity in the fine art field to be measured and the range of approaches to enquiry to be evaluated. The analysis of doctoral work to date indicates the extent to which professional practice has begun to be incorporated into doctoral projects. An uncritical revisionism or relabelling of activities within the realm of professional practice and doctoral study is evident in the data consulted in the two studies, reflecting the continuing prominence of the exhibition as a means of disseminating the outcomes of creative practice.

AB - This article reports on the issues arising from the AHRC Research Review: Practice-Led Research in Art, Design and Architecture, published in February 2008 by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council. These include the continuing question of defining activity in the field, the underdeveloped scholarly infrastructure, and the nature of the contribution to knowledge made by the artefact or designed object. The article also draws upon an analysis of completed doctorates in art and design made possible by the Art & Design Index to Theses (ADIT). This earlier project, which set up a scholarly resource for the research community, enables the growth of doctoral activity in the fine art field to be measured and the range of approaches to enquiry to be evaluated. The analysis of doctoral work to date indicates the extent to which professional practice has begun to be incorporated into doctoral projects. An uncritical revisionism or relabelling of activities within the realm of professional practice and doctoral study is evident in the data consulted in the two studies, reflecting the continuing prominence of the exhibition as a means of disseminating the outcomes of creative practice.

U2 - 10.1386/jvap.7.2.133_1

DO - 10.1386/jvap.7.2.133_1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 133

EP - 151

JO - Journal of Visual Art Practice

JF - Journal of Visual Art Practice

SN - 1470-2029

IS - 2

ER -