Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The people’s climate plan

Electronic data

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The people’s climate plan: A review of UK deliberative mini publics and public preferences on climate policy

Research output: ThesisMaster's Thesis

Published

Standard

The people’s climate plan: A review of UK deliberative mini publics and public preferences on climate policy. / Shepherd, Alfie.
Lancaster University, 2024. 74 p.

Research output: ThesisMaster's Thesis

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Shepherd A. The people’s climate plan: A review of UK deliberative mini publics and public preferences on climate policy. Lancaster University, 2024. 74 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2565

Author

Bibtex

@mastersthesis{7dda8f3f4b934d89991439e4fc40186e,
title = "The people{\textquoteright}s climate plan: A review of UK deliberative mini publics and public preferences on climate policy",
abstract = "The UK must reach net zero by 2050, but the path to this target remains unclear and progress to date has been insufficient. There are concerns that our democratic institutions may be unable to develop effective climate policies which work for citizens. This has seen calls for increased public engagementin climate policy, often informed by the ideals of deliberative democracy. Experimentation with deliberative innovations have taken place in various local, national, and international contexts on policy challenges, such as climate change. The deliberative mini public (DMP) has emerged in this space, bringing together a representative sample of a population to hear expert opinion, discuss with peers, and produce recommendations on what they think should happen. Deliberation produces detailed and informed public opinion based on evidence and reason, transforming public preferences and indicating what the wider public might think had they had the time to deliberate on the issue.The use of DMPs has been significant in the UK, both at the local and national level. The systems turn in deliberative democracy has opened debates on DMP{\textquoteright}s role in the wider democratic system, and their potential role to {\textquoteleft}signal{\textquoteright} the wider public towards issues which require more attention and debate. This research, therefore, undertakes a review of 30 UK DMPs on climate change from 2019-2023. Their recommendations are aggregated to establish which climate policies are well-supported. Publicly available polling data from the same period is collected and compared to the findings of the DMP analysis to assess where DMPs and polls diverge and converge on support for climate policies.This reveals the {\textquoteleft}signals{\textquoteright} DMPs may send to the wider public and other political actors on climate. The research explores the role of the climate DMPs in the political system, discussing its strengths and weaknesses as a tool available to institutions.",
author = "Alfie Shepherd",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2565",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - THES

T1 - The people’s climate plan

T2 - A review of UK deliberative mini publics and public preferences on climate policy

AU - Shepherd, Alfie

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - The UK must reach net zero by 2050, but the path to this target remains unclear and progress to date has been insufficient. There are concerns that our democratic institutions may be unable to develop effective climate policies which work for citizens. This has seen calls for increased public engagementin climate policy, often informed by the ideals of deliberative democracy. Experimentation with deliberative innovations have taken place in various local, national, and international contexts on policy challenges, such as climate change. The deliberative mini public (DMP) has emerged in this space, bringing together a representative sample of a population to hear expert opinion, discuss with peers, and produce recommendations on what they think should happen. Deliberation produces detailed and informed public opinion based on evidence and reason, transforming public preferences and indicating what the wider public might think had they had the time to deliberate on the issue.The use of DMPs has been significant in the UK, both at the local and national level. The systems turn in deliberative democracy has opened debates on DMP’s role in the wider democratic system, and their potential role to ‘signal’ the wider public towards issues which require more attention and debate. This research, therefore, undertakes a review of 30 UK DMPs on climate change from 2019-2023. Their recommendations are aggregated to establish which climate policies are well-supported. Publicly available polling data from the same period is collected and compared to the findings of the DMP analysis to assess where DMPs and polls diverge and converge on support for climate policies.This reveals the ‘signals’ DMPs may send to the wider public and other political actors on climate. The research explores the role of the climate DMPs in the political system, discussing its strengths and weaknesses as a tool available to institutions.

AB - The UK must reach net zero by 2050, but the path to this target remains unclear and progress to date has been insufficient. There are concerns that our democratic institutions may be unable to develop effective climate policies which work for citizens. This has seen calls for increased public engagementin climate policy, often informed by the ideals of deliberative democracy. Experimentation with deliberative innovations have taken place in various local, national, and international contexts on policy challenges, such as climate change. The deliberative mini public (DMP) has emerged in this space, bringing together a representative sample of a population to hear expert opinion, discuss with peers, and produce recommendations on what they think should happen. Deliberation produces detailed and informed public opinion based on evidence and reason, transforming public preferences and indicating what the wider public might think had they had the time to deliberate on the issue.The use of DMPs has been significant in the UK, both at the local and national level. The systems turn in deliberative democracy has opened debates on DMP’s role in the wider democratic system, and their potential role to ‘signal’ the wider public towards issues which require more attention and debate. This research, therefore, undertakes a review of 30 UK DMPs on climate change from 2019-2023. Their recommendations are aggregated to establish which climate policies are well-supported. Publicly available polling data from the same period is collected and compared to the findings of the DMP analysis to assess where DMPs and polls diverge and converge on support for climate policies.This reveals the ‘signals’ DMPs may send to the wider public and other political actors on climate. The research explores the role of the climate DMPs in the political system, discussing its strengths and weaknesses as a tool available to institutions.

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2565

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2565

M3 - Master's Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -