Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The people's war in personal testimony and bronze
View graph of relations

The people's war in personal testimony and bronze: sorority and the memorial to The Women of World War II

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)

Published

Standard

The people's war in personal testimony and bronze: sorority and the memorial to The Women of World War II. / Peniston-Bird, Corinna.
British cultural memory and the Second World War. ed. / Lucy Noakes; Juliette Pattinson. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. p. 67-87.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Peniston-Bird C. The people's war in personal testimony and bronze: sorority and the memorial to The Women of World War II. In Noakes L, Pattinson J, editors, British cultural memory and the Second World War. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 2013. p. 67-87

Author

Peniston-Bird, Corinna. / The people's war in personal testimony and bronze : sorority and the memorial to The Women of World War II. British cultural memory and the Second World War. editor / Lucy Noakes ; Juliette Pattinson. London : Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. pp. 67-87

Bibtex

@inbook{a99ec7d6f6df454c89fbcf6115481cab,
title = "The people's war in personal testimony and bronze: sorority and the memorial to The Women of World War II",
abstract = "In British memories of service and the Home Front, the People{\textquoteright}s War remains a dominant historical discourse. In personal testimony, we find numerous accounts which subscribe on one level to the construction of the War as a period in which the nation voluntarily united in defence of Britain and its values. The powerful rhetoric of the People{\textquoteright}s War deepens the sense of betrayal when individuals feel they have been denied appropriate public recognition of their participation. As the furore over the Memorial to the Women of World War II (2005) revealed, the People{\textquoteright}s War meant and means different things to different constituencies. The contention over the elision of female service in the auxiliary forces and on the home front in John Mills{\textquoteright} monument design speaks to the on-going historical debate over the limitations of collective solidarity. In this case, it is the limits of sorority which were illuminated as women challenged the gendered construction of their participation in the People{\textquoteright}s War.",
keywords = "Oral history, patriotism, Second World War",
author = "Corinna Peniston-Bird",
year = "2013",
month = nov,
day = "22",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781441160577",
pages = "67--87",
editor = "Lucy Noakes and Juliette Pattinson",
booktitle = "British cultural memory and the Second World War",
publisher = "Bloomsbury Academic",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - The people's war in personal testimony and bronze

T2 - sorority and the memorial to The Women of World War II

AU - Peniston-Bird, Corinna

PY - 2013/11/22

Y1 - 2013/11/22

N2 - In British memories of service and the Home Front, the People’s War remains a dominant historical discourse. In personal testimony, we find numerous accounts which subscribe on one level to the construction of the War as a period in which the nation voluntarily united in defence of Britain and its values. The powerful rhetoric of the People’s War deepens the sense of betrayal when individuals feel they have been denied appropriate public recognition of their participation. As the furore over the Memorial to the Women of World War II (2005) revealed, the People’s War meant and means different things to different constituencies. The contention over the elision of female service in the auxiliary forces and on the home front in John Mills’ monument design speaks to the on-going historical debate over the limitations of collective solidarity. In this case, it is the limits of sorority which were illuminated as women challenged the gendered construction of their participation in the People’s War.

AB - In British memories of service and the Home Front, the People’s War remains a dominant historical discourse. In personal testimony, we find numerous accounts which subscribe on one level to the construction of the War as a period in which the nation voluntarily united in defence of Britain and its values. The powerful rhetoric of the People’s War deepens the sense of betrayal when individuals feel they have been denied appropriate public recognition of their participation. As the furore over the Memorial to the Women of World War II (2005) revealed, the People’s War meant and means different things to different constituencies. The contention over the elision of female service in the auxiliary forces and on the home front in John Mills’ monument design speaks to the on-going historical debate over the limitations of collective solidarity. In this case, it is the limits of sorority which were illuminated as women challenged the gendered construction of their participation in the People’s War.

KW - Oral history

KW - patriotism

KW - Second World War

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9781441160577

SP - 67

EP - 87

BT - British cultural memory and the Second World War

A2 - Noakes, Lucy

A2 - Pattinson, Juliette

PB - Bloomsbury Academic

CY - London

ER -