Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The potential for kelp manufacture to lead to a...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The potential for kelp manufacture to lead to arsenic pollution of remote Scottish islands

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The potential for kelp manufacture to lead to arsenic pollution of remote Scottish islands. / Riekie, G.J.; Williams, Paul; Raab, A. et al.
In: Chemosphere, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2006, p. 332-342.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Riekie GJ, Williams P, Raab A, Meharg AA. The potential for kelp manufacture to lead to arsenic pollution of remote Scottish islands. Chemosphere. 2006;65(2):332-342. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.025

Author

Riekie, G.J. ; Williams, Paul ; Raab, A. et al. / The potential for kelp manufacture to lead to arsenic pollution of remote Scottish islands. In: Chemosphere. 2006 ; Vol. 65, No. 2. pp. 332-342.

Bibtex

@article{1e045ee1b02b4ab0a5f0a93193cd513c,
title = "The potential for kelp manufacture to lead to arsenic pollution of remote Scottish islands",
abstract = "Burning seaweed to produce kelp, valued for its high potash and soda content, was formerly a significant industry in remote coastal areas of Scotland and elsewhere. Given the high concentrations of arsenic in seaweeds, up to 100 mg kg−1, this study investigates the possibility that the kelp industry caused arsenic contamination of these pristine environments. A series of laboratory-scale seaweed burning experiments was conducted, and analysis of the products using HPLC ICP-MS shows that at least 40% of the arsenic originally in the seaweed could have been released into the fumes. The hypothesis that the burning process transforms arsenic from low toxicity arsenosugars in the original seaweeds (Fucus vesiculosus and Laminaria digitata) to highly toxic inorganic forms, predominantly arsenate, is consistent with As speciation analysis results. A field study conducted on Westray, Orkney, once a major centre for kelp production, shows that elevated arsenic levels (10.7 ± 3.0 mg kg−1, compared to background levels of 1.7 ± 0.2 mg kg−1) persist in soils in the immediate vicinity of the kelp burning pits. A model combining results from the burning experiments with data from historical records demonstrates the potential for arsenic deposition of 47 g ha−1 year−1 on land adjacent to the main kelp burning location on Westray, and for arsenic concentrations exceeding current UK soil guideline values during the 50 year period of peak kelp production. ",
author = "G.J. Riekie and Paul Williams and A. Raab and Meharg, {A. A.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.025",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "332--342",
journal = "Chemosphere",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "NLM (Medline)",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The potential for kelp manufacture to lead to arsenic pollution of remote Scottish islands

AU - Riekie, G.J.

AU - Williams, Paul

AU - Raab, A.

AU - Meharg, A. A.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Burning seaweed to produce kelp, valued for its high potash and soda content, was formerly a significant industry in remote coastal areas of Scotland and elsewhere. Given the high concentrations of arsenic in seaweeds, up to 100 mg kg−1, this study investigates the possibility that the kelp industry caused arsenic contamination of these pristine environments. A series of laboratory-scale seaweed burning experiments was conducted, and analysis of the products using HPLC ICP-MS shows that at least 40% of the arsenic originally in the seaweed could have been released into the fumes. The hypothesis that the burning process transforms arsenic from low toxicity arsenosugars in the original seaweeds (Fucus vesiculosus and Laminaria digitata) to highly toxic inorganic forms, predominantly arsenate, is consistent with As speciation analysis results. A field study conducted on Westray, Orkney, once a major centre for kelp production, shows that elevated arsenic levels (10.7 ± 3.0 mg kg−1, compared to background levels of 1.7 ± 0.2 mg kg−1) persist in soils in the immediate vicinity of the kelp burning pits. A model combining results from the burning experiments with data from historical records demonstrates the potential for arsenic deposition of 47 g ha−1 year−1 on land adjacent to the main kelp burning location on Westray, and for arsenic concentrations exceeding current UK soil guideline values during the 50 year period of peak kelp production.

AB - Burning seaweed to produce kelp, valued for its high potash and soda content, was formerly a significant industry in remote coastal areas of Scotland and elsewhere. Given the high concentrations of arsenic in seaweeds, up to 100 mg kg−1, this study investigates the possibility that the kelp industry caused arsenic contamination of these pristine environments. A series of laboratory-scale seaweed burning experiments was conducted, and analysis of the products using HPLC ICP-MS shows that at least 40% of the arsenic originally in the seaweed could have been released into the fumes. The hypothesis that the burning process transforms arsenic from low toxicity arsenosugars in the original seaweeds (Fucus vesiculosus and Laminaria digitata) to highly toxic inorganic forms, predominantly arsenate, is consistent with As speciation analysis results. A field study conducted on Westray, Orkney, once a major centre for kelp production, shows that elevated arsenic levels (10.7 ± 3.0 mg kg−1, compared to background levels of 1.7 ± 0.2 mg kg−1) persist in soils in the immediate vicinity of the kelp burning pits. A model combining results from the burning experiments with data from historical records demonstrates the potential for arsenic deposition of 47 g ha−1 year−1 on land adjacent to the main kelp burning location on Westray, and for arsenic concentrations exceeding current UK soil guideline values during the 50 year period of peak kelp production.

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.025

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.025

M3 - Journal article

VL - 65

SP - 332

EP - 342

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

SN - 0045-6535

IS - 2

ER -