Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The prevalence of common mental disorders acros...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The prevalence of common mental disorders across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS)

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The prevalence of common mental disorders across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS). / Irizar, P.; Taylor, H.; Kapadia, D. et al.
In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 358, 01.08.2024, p. 42-51.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Irizar, P, Taylor, H, Kapadia, D, Pierce, M, Bécares, L, Goodwin, L, Katikireddi, SV & Nazroo, J 2024, 'The prevalence of common mental disorders across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS)', Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 358, pp. 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.026

APA

Irizar, P., Taylor, H., Kapadia, D., Pierce, M., Bécares, L., Goodwin, L., Katikireddi, S. V., & Nazroo, J. (2024). The prevalence of common mental disorders across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS). Journal of Affective Disorders, 358, 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.026

Vancouver

Irizar P, Taylor H, Kapadia D, Pierce M, Bécares L, Goodwin L et al. The prevalence of common mental disorders across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS). Journal of Affective Disorders. 2024 Aug 1;358:42-51. Epub 2024 May 7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.026

Author

Irizar, P. ; Taylor, H. ; Kapadia, D. et al. / The prevalence of common mental disorders across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic : Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS). In: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2024 ; Vol. 358. pp. 42-51.

Bibtex

@article{4600976f945a479aaab9986ecc4e1571,
title = "The prevalence of common mental disorders across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS)",
abstract = "Background: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted mental health in the general population in Britain. Ethnic minority people suffered disproportionately, in terms of health and economic outcomes, which may contribute to poorer mental health. We compare the prevalence of depression and anxiety across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data (February–November 2021) from 12,161 participants aged 18–60 years old (N with data on outcomes = 11,540 for depression & 11,825 for anxiety), obtained from the Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS). Data were weighted to account for selection bias and coverage bias. Weighted regression models examined ethnic differences in depression (Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) and anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7). Effect modification analyses explored whether ethnic differences in outcomes were consistent within age and sex sub-groups. Results: Compared to White British people, greater odds of anxiety caseness (and greater anxiety symptoms) were observed for Arab (OR = 2.57; 95 % CI = 1.35–4.91), Mixed White and Black Caribbean (1.57; 1.07–2.30), any other Black (2.22, 1.28–3.87) and any other Mixed (1.58; 1.08–2.31) ethnic groups. Lower odds of depression caseness (and lower depressive symptoms) were identified for Chinese (0.63; 0.46–0.85), Black African (0.60; 0.46–0.79), and any other Asian (0.55; 0.42–0.72) ethnic groups. Limitations: Cross-sectional data limits the opportunity to identify changes in ethnic inequalities in mental health over time. Conclusions: We have identified certain ethnic groups who may require more targeted mental health support to ensure equitable recovery post-pandemic. Despite finding lower levels of depression for some ethnic groups, approximately one third of people within each ethnic group met criteria for depression. ",
keywords = "Anxiety, Common mental disorders, Depression, Epidemiology, Ethnic inequalities",
author = "P. Irizar and H. Taylor and D. Kapadia and M. Pierce and L. B{\'e}cares and L. Goodwin and S.V. Katikireddi and J. Nazroo",
year = "2024",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.026",
language = "English",
volume = "358",
pages = "42--51",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The prevalence of common mental disorders across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic

T2 - Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS)

AU - Irizar, P.

AU - Taylor, H.

AU - Kapadia, D.

AU - Pierce, M.

AU - Bécares, L.

AU - Goodwin, L.

AU - Katikireddi, S.V.

AU - Nazroo, J.

PY - 2024/8/1

Y1 - 2024/8/1

N2 - Background: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted mental health in the general population in Britain. Ethnic minority people suffered disproportionately, in terms of health and economic outcomes, which may contribute to poorer mental health. We compare the prevalence of depression and anxiety across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data (February–November 2021) from 12,161 participants aged 18–60 years old (N with data on outcomes = 11,540 for depression & 11,825 for anxiety), obtained from the Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS). Data were weighted to account for selection bias and coverage bias. Weighted regression models examined ethnic differences in depression (Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) and anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7). Effect modification analyses explored whether ethnic differences in outcomes were consistent within age and sex sub-groups. Results: Compared to White British people, greater odds of anxiety caseness (and greater anxiety symptoms) were observed for Arab (OR = 2.57; 95 % CI = 1.35–4.91), Mixed White and Black Caribbean (1.57; 1.07–2.30), any other Black (2.22, 1.28–3.87) and any other Mixed (1.58; 1.08–2.31) ethnic groups. Lower odds of depression caseness (and lower depressive symptoms) were identified for Chinese (0.63; 0.46–0.85), Black African (0.60; 0.46–0.79), and any other Asian (0.55; 0.42–0.72) ethnic groups. Limitations: Cross-sectional data limits the opportunity to identify changes in ethnic inequalities in mental health over time. Conclusions: We have identified certain ethnic groups who may require more targeted mental health support to ensure equitable recovery post-pandemic. Despite finding lower levels of depression for some ethnic groups, approximately one third of people within each ethnic group met criteria for depression. 

AB - Background: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted mental health in the general population in Britain. Ethnic minority people suffered disproportionately, in terms of health and economic outcomes, which may contribute to poorer mental health. We compare the prevalence of depression and anxiety across 18 ethnic groups in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data (February–November 2021) from 12,161 participants aged 18–60 years old (N with data on outcomes = 11,540 for depression & 11,825 for anxiety), obtained from the Evidence for Equality National Survey (EVENS). Data were weighted to account for selection bias and coverage bias. Weighted regression models examined ethnic differences in depression (Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) and anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7). Effect modification analyses explored whether ethnic differences in outcomes were consistent within age and sex sub-groups. Results: Compared to White British people, greater odds of anxiety caseness (and greater anxiety symptoms) were observed for Arab (OR = 2.57; 95 % CI = 1.35–4.91), Mixed White and Black Caribbean (1.57; 1.07–2.30), any other Black (2.22, 1.28–3.87) and any other Mixed (1.58; 1.08–2.31) ethnic groups. Lower odds of depression caseness (and lower depressive symptoms) were identified for Chinese (0.63; 0.46–0.85), Black African (0.60; 0.46–0.79), and any other Asian (0.55; 0.42–0.72) ethnic groups. Limitations: Cross-sectional data limits the opportunity to identify changes in ethnic inequalities in mental health over time. Conclusions: We have identified certain ethnic groups who may require more targeted mental health support to ensure equitable recovery post-pandemic. Despite finding lower levels of depression for some ethnic groups, approximately one third of people within each ethnic group met criteria for depression. 

KW - Anxiety

KW - Common mental disorders

KW - Depression

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Ethnic inequalities

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.026

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.026

M3 - Journal article

VL - 358

SP - 42

EP - 51

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -