Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Com...

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

The Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Competition Investigations: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Implications.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Competition Investigations: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Implications. / MacCulloch, Angus D.

In: Legal Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2, 06.2006, p. 211-237.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{69bcc89650964ea4876a7081dd8c4aca,
title = "The Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Competition Investigations: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Implications.",
abstract = "This paper examines the historical and theoretical basis of the privilege against self-incrimination and the case-law regarding the privilege before the UK and European courts in order to understand better the development of the privilege in relation to competition investigations in the UK and EU. The historical and theoretical basis of the privilege indicates that the privilege is a relatively modern legal creation and a number of theoretical bases are offered to justify its existence. The theoretical justifications assist in a better understanding of the extant case-law, but indicate that some of the distinctions drawn between categories of protected information have no clear basis. The paper goes on to examine the difference between self-incrimination and self-accusation, the extension of {\textquoteleft}human{\textquoteright} rights to corporate entities, and the existence of a privilege as a {\textquoteleft}functional necessity{\textquoteright}. Finally the paper makes some suggestions about the type of information that might be sought legitimately in competition investigations and those requests that might be challenged.",
author = "MacCulloch, {Angus D.}",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Law",
year = "2006",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00012.x",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "211--237",
journal = "Legal Studies",
issn = "0261-3875",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Privilege against Self-Incrimination in Competition Investigations: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Implications.

AU - MacCulloch, Angus D.

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Law

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - This paper examines the historical and theoretical basis of the privilege against self-incrimination and the case-law regarding the privilege before the UK and European courts in order to understand better the development of the privilege in relation to competition investigations in the UK and EU. The historical and theoretical basis of the privilege indicates that the privilege is a relatively modern legal creation and a number of theoretical bases are offered to justify its existence. The theoretical justifications assist in a better understanding of the extant case-law, but indicate that some of the distinctions drawn between categories of protected information have no clear basis. The paper goes on to examine the difference between self-incrimination and self-accusation, the extension of ‘human’ rights to corporate entities, and the existence of a privilege as a ‘functional necessity’. Finally the paper makes some suggestions about the type of information that might be sought legitimately in competition investigations and those requests that might be challenged.

AB - This paper examines the historical and theoretical basis of the privilege against self-incrimination and the case-law regarding the privilege before the UK and European courts in order to understand better the development of the privilege in relation to competition investigations in the UK and EU. The historical and theoretical basis of the privilege indicates that the privilege is a relatively modern legal creation and a number of theoretical bases are offered to justify its existence. The theoretical justifications assist in a better understanding of the extant case-law, but indicate that some of the distinctions drawn between categories of protected information have no clear basis. The paper goes on to examine the difference between self-incrimination and self-accusation, the extension of ‘human’ rights to corporate entities, and the existence of a privilege as a ‘functional necessity’. Finally the paper makes some suggestions about the type of information that might be sought legitimately in competition investigations and those requests that might be challenged.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00012.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00012.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 211

EP - 237

JO - Legal Studies

JF - Legal Studies

SN - 0261-3875

IS - 2

ER -