Accepted author manuscript, 549 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The problem of reading motivation multidimensionality
T2 - Theoretical and statistical evaluation of a reading motivation scale
AU - Jeldrez, Elvira
AU - Cain, Kate
AU - Silva, Macarena
AU - Strasser, Katherine
PY - 2023/10/3
Y1 - 2023/10/3
N2 - Reading motivation is multidimensional and a critical contributor to students’ reading comprehension skill. Its multidimensionality is problematic, as there is currently no consensus on the dimensions underlying reading motivation, which are being tested through a variety of instruments that lack statistical validation. Our goal was to discuss the structure, reliability, and validity of a reading motivation scale in relation to prior theoretical proposals. The scale considered four affirming and four undermining reading motivations and was tested with 172 students from 2nd to 6th grade. Its structure was assessed using CFA and EFA. A four-factor structure had the best fit for the data: (1) Reading value and intrinsic motivation; (2) reading devalue and avoidance; (3) perceived self-efficacy; and (4) perceived difficulty. The results supported some prior theoretical distinctions, but question the appropriateness of widely used scales and suggest the need for more research on the multidimensionality of reading motivation.
AB - Reading motivation is multidimensional and a critical contributor to students’ reading comprehension skill. Its multidimensionality is problematic, as there is currently no consensus on the dimensions underlying reading motivation, which are being tested through a variety of instruments that lack statistical validation. Our goal was to discuss the structure, reliability, and validity of a reading motivation scale in relation to prior theoretical proposals. The scale considered four affirming and four undermining reading motivations and was tested with 172 students from 2nd to 6th grade. Its structure was assessed using CFA and EFA. A four-factor structure had the best fit for the data: (1) Reading value and intrinsic motivation; (2) reading devalue and avoidance; (3) perceived self-efficacy; and (4) perceived difficulty. The results supported some prior theoretical distinctions, but question the appropriateness of widely used scales and suggest the need for more research on the multidimensionality of reading motivation.
KW - reading motivation
KW - scale
KW - factor analysis
KW - affirming motivations
KW - undermining motivations
U2 - 10.1080/02702711.2023.2202175
DO - 10.1080/02702711.2023.2202175
M3 - Journal article
VL - 44
SP - 853
EP - 891
JO - Reading Psychology
JF - Reading Psychology
SN - 1521-0685
IS - 7
ER -