Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Problem of the Attractor A Singular General...
View graph of relations

The Problem of the Attractor A Singular Generality between Sciences and Social Theory.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Problem of the Attractor A Singular Generality between Sciences and Social Theory. / Mackenzie, A.
In: Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 22, No. 5, 10.2005, p. 45-65.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Mackenzie A. The Problem of the Attractor A Singular Generality between Sciences and Social Theory. Theory, Culture and Society. 2005 Oct;22(5):45-65. doi: 10.1177/0263276405057190

Author

Mackenzie, A. / The Problem of the Attractor A Singular Generality between Sciences and Social Theory. In: Theory, Culture and Society. 2005 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 45-65.

Bibtex

@article{d1329a611dd74fc59506d0c5e16f7052,
title = "The Problem of the Attractor A Singular Generality between Sciences and Social Theory.",
abstract = "Contemporary complexity sciences claim a literal, non-metaphorical applicability to physical, economic, social and cultural events. They envision the development of a general social or historical physics. Conversely, in the social sciences and humanities, complexity sciences have been typically treated as a source of new metaphors or tropes to be used in theory-building. Can there be a critical social or historical physics that is not a world-view and that does not treat science as a source of metaphors? The Lorenz attractor figures centrally in the history of complexity science as a popular image of deterministic chaos butterfly effect , as an indication of how far complexity science has progressed in the last two decades, and, as this article argues, as an event whose multiplicity of interpretations attests to the problem it raises, the problem of generality associated with complexity. Via the Lorenz attractor, the article examines three attempts to treat complexity non-metaphorically in recent theoretical work (Delanda; Massumi; Stengers). In these accounts, the attractor performs several different functions. It forms part of a re-engineered concept of multiplicity, it helps conceptualize feeling or sensitivity, and it raises the general problem of practice in theory-building.",
keywords = "attractor multiplicity",
author = "A Mackenzie",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory, Culture and Society, 22 (5), 2005, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2005 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory, Cultre and Society page: http://tcs.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/",
year = "2005",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1177/0263276405057190",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "45--65",
journal = "Theory, Culture and Society",
issn = "1460-3616",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Problem of the Attractor A Singular Generality between Sciences and Social Theory.

AU - Mackenzie, A

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Theory, Culture and Society, 22 (5), 2005, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2005 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Theory, Cultre and Society page: http://tcs.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - Contemporary complexity sciences claim a literal, non-metaphorical applicability to physical, economic, social and cultural events. They envision the development of a general social or historical physics. Conversely, in the social sciences and humanities, complexity sciences have been typically treated as a source of new metaphors or tropes to be used in theory-building. Can there be a critical social or historical physics that is not a world-view and that does not treat science as a source of metaphors? The Lorenz attractor figures centrally in the history of complexity science as a popular image of deterministic chaos butterfly effect , as an indication of how far complexity science has progressed in the last two decades, and, as this article argues, as an event whose multiplicity of interpretations attests to the problem it raises, the problem of generality associated with complexity. Via the Lorenz attractor, the article examines three attempts to treat complexity non-metaphorically in recent theoretical work (Delanda; Massumi; Stengers). In these accounts, the attractor performs several different functions. It forms part of a re-engineered concept of multiplicity, it helps conceptualize feeling or sensitivity, and it raises the general problem of practice in theory-building.

AB - Contemporary complexity sciences claim a literal, non-metaphorical applicability to physical, economic, social and cultural events. They envision the development of a general social or historical physics. Conversely, in the social sciences and humanities, complexity sciences have been typically treated as a source of new metaphors or tropes to be used in theory-building. Can there be a critical social or historical physics that is not a world-view and that does not treat science as a source of metaphors? The Lorenz attractor figures centrally in the history of complexity science as a popular image of deterministic chaos butterfly effect , as an indication of how far complexity science has progressed in the last two decades, and, as this article argues, as an event whose multiplicity of interpretations attests to the problem it raises, the problem of generality associated with complexity. Via the Lorenz attractor, the article examines three attempts to treat complexity non-metaphorically in recent theoretical work (Delanda; Massumi; Stengers). In these accounts, the attractor performs several different functions. It forms part of a re-engineered concept of multiplicity, it helps conceptualize feeling or sensitivity, and it raises the general problem of practice in theory-building.

KW - attractor multiplicity

U2 - 10.1177/0263276405057190

DO - 10.1177/0263276405057190

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 45

EP - 65

JO - Theory, Culture and Society

JF - Theory, Culture and Society

SN - 1460-3616

IS - 5

ER -