TY - JOUR

T1 - The recognition of read and spontaneous speech in local vernacular

T2 - the case of Zurich German dialect

AU - Dellwo, Volker

AU - Leemann, Adrian

AU - Kolly, Marie-José

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - Listeners are typically able to identify speech as either being produced spontaneously or read from a transcript. In the present research we investigated whether this is true in vernacular speech when typical cues to read and spontaneous speech are either missing and/or ambiguous. In addition it was investigated what the acoustic cues for listeners' identification ability were. 26 listeners of Zurich German participated in two perception experiments. In Experiment I, listeners judged 128 stimuli (64 spontaneous, 64 read) in a two-alternative identification task as either spontaneous or read. Results revealed that overall listener performance was well above chance (mean A ′=0.82) while there was no bias for either read or spontaneous speech (mean View the MathML source). There were significant effects of speaker and listener in A ′ and View the MathML source. In Experiment II, the same 26 listeners rated the same 64 read speech stimuli from Experiment I as to whether they sounded more or less read. Results revealed that there was considerable within-category variability as a function of speaker. From eight acoustic prosodic parameters only articulation rate explained listener behavior to some degree in Experiments I and II. Overall the study suggested that read and spontaneous speech can be recognized based on very subtle cues to these speaking styles.

AB - Listeners are typically able to identify speech as either being produced spontaneously or read from a transcript. In the present research we investigated whether this is true in vernacular speech when typical cues to read and spontaneous speech are either missing and/or ambiguous. In addition it was investigated what the acoustic cues for listeners' identification ability were. 26 listeners of Zurich German participated in two perception experiments. In Experiment I, listeners judged 128 stimuli (64 spontaneous, 64 read) in a two-alternative identification task as either spontaneous or read. Results revealed that overall listener performance was well above chance (mean A ′=0.82) while there was no bias for either read or spontaneous speech (mean View the MathML source). There were significant effects of speaker and listener in A ′ and View the MathML source. In Experiment II, the same 26 listeners rated the same 64 read speech stimuli from Experiment I as to whether they sounded more or less read. Results revealed that there was considerable within-category variability as a function of speaker. From eight acoustic prosodic parameters only articulation rate explained listener behavior to some degree in Experiments I and II. Overall the study suggested that read and spontaneous speech can be recognized based on very subtle cues to these speaking styles.

KW - Speech perception

KW - Speaking style

KW - Read and spontaneous speech

KW - Speaker-specific characteristics

KW - Listener-specific characteristics

U2 - 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.011

DO - 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.011

M3 - Journal article

VL - 48

SP - 13

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Phonetics

JF - Journal of Phonetics

SN - 0095-4470

ER -