Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The relevance of 'work-practice' for design

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The relevance of 'work-practice' for design

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The relevance of 'work-practice' for design. / Button, G.; Harper, R.
In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 4, No. 4, 12.1995, p. 263-280.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Button, G & Harper, R 1995, 'The relevance of 'work-practice' for design', Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01846695

APA

Button, G., & Harper, R. (1995). The relevance of 'work-practice' for design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4(4), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01846695

Vancouver

Button G, Harper R. The relevance of 'work-practice' for design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1995 Dec;4(4):263-280. doi: 10.1007/BF01846695

Author

Button, G. ; Harper, R. / The relevance of 'work-practice' for design. In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 1995 ; Vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 263-280.

Bibtex

@article{6c3c197d5d2f47558e3b2c8525eb9658,
title = "The relevance of 'work-practice' for design",
abstract = "Designers are increasingly being urged to take account of the situated and contingent organisation of the work that their systems are to support or automate. Within CSCW the concept of work-practice is a much used token for the organisation of work. This paper develops the debate about the position of work-practice in design by recognising that it is an ambiguous concept in sociology that is used to refer to different orders to work organisation. It is argued that as such it is as likely to mask the situated and contingent organisation of work as it is to make it visible. In order to fully realise the radicalisation of design portended by the deployment of the concept of work-practice and in order to make visible the in situ organisation of work it is argued that full and due weight has to be placed upon grounding the concept in analytic explications of the interactional ordering of work. This stands in contrast to grounding work-practice in the formalisms of work emanating from theoretical debates about work in a capitalist economic/social structure; documentations of work; the narratives of workers, managers, and purchasers; dialogues with users, and mere observations of work. Two studies are invoked to substantiate this argument, one involving a sales ordering and invoicing system, the other a crime reporting system. {\textcopyright} 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers.",
keywords = "crime reporting systems, Design, ethnomethodology, ordering and invoicing systems, sales, sociological description, work-practice, Automation, Job analysis, Marketing, Social aspects, Societies and institutions, Supervisory personnel, Work simplification, Crime reporting systems, Ethnomethodology, Ordering and invoicing systems, Purchasers, Sociology, Work practice, Administrative data processing",
author = "G. Button and R. Harper",
year = "1995",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/BF01846695",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "263--280",
journal = "Computer Supported Cooperative Work",
issn = "0925-9724",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relevance of 'work-practice' for design

AU - Button, G.

AU - Harper, R.

PY - 1995/12

Y1 - 1995/12

N2 - Designers are increasingly being urged to take account of the situated and contingent organisation of the work that their systems are to support or automate. Within CSCW the concept of work-practice is a much used token for the organisation of work. This paper develops the debate about the position of work-practice in design by recognising that it is an ambiguous concept in sociology that is used to refer to different orders to work organisation. It is argued that as such it is as likely to mask the situated and contingent organisation of work as it is to make it visible. In order to fully realise the radicalisation of design portended by the deployment of the concept of work-practice and in order to make visible the in situ organisation of work it is argued that full and due weight has to be placed upon grounding the concept in analytic explications of the interactional ordering of work. This stands in contrast to grounding work-practice in the formalisms of work emanating from theoretical debates about work in a capitalist economic/social structure; documentations of work; the narratives of workers, managers, and purchasers; dialogues with users, and mere observations of work. Two studies are invoked to substantiate this argument, one involving a sales ordering and invoicing system, the other a crime reporting system. © 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

AB - Designers are increasingly being urged to take account of the situated and contingent organisation of the work that their systems are to support or automate. Within CSCW the concept of work-practice is a much used token for the organisation of work. This paper develops the debate about the position of work-practice in design by recognising that it is an ambiguous concept in sociology that is used to refer to different orders to work organisation. It is argued that as such it is as likely to mask the situated and contingent organisation of work as it is to make it visible. In order to fully realise the radicalisation of design portended by the deployment of the concept of work-practice and in order to make visible the in situ organisation of work it is argued that full and due weight has to be placed upon grounding the concept in analytic explications of the interactional ordering of work. This stands in contrast to grounding work-practice in the formalisms of work emanating from theoretical debates about work in a capitalist economic/social structure; documentations of work; the narratives of workers, managers, and purchasers; dialogues with users, and mere observations of work. Two studies are invoked to substantiate this argument, one involving a sales ordering and invoicing system, the other a crime reporting system. © 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

KW - crime reporting systems

KW - Design

KW - ethnomethodology

KW - ordering and invoicing systems

KW - sales

KW - sociological description

KW - work-practice

KW - Automation

KW - Job analysis

KW - Marketing

KW - Social aspects

KW - Societies and institutions

KW - Supervisory personnel

KW - Work simplification

KW - Crime reporting systems

KW - Ethnomethodology

KW - Ordering and invoicing systems

KW - Purchasers

KW - Sociology

KW - Work practice

KW - Administrative data processing

U2 - 10.1007/BF01846695

DO - 10.1007/BF01846695

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 263

EP - 280

JO - Computer Supported Cooperative Work

JF - Computer Supported Cooperative Work

SN - 0925-9724

IS - 4

ER -