Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The researcher as cognitive activist and the mu...

Electronic data

  • 11308

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Power and Education, 9 (2), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Power and Education page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/pae on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 612 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The researcher as cognitive activist and the mutually useful conversation

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The researcher as cognitive activist and the mutually useful conversation. / Earl, Cassie.

In: Power & Education, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.07.2017, p. 129-144.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Earl, Cassie. / The researcher as cognitive activist and the mutually useful conversation. In: Power & Education. 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 129-144.

Bibtex

@article{511507b26cac4ce1b0d25a6529f97ded,
title = "The researcher as cognitive activist and the mutually useful conversation",
abstract = "This autoethnagraphic article argues that in the study of political education, especially learning through social movement activities, the knowledge produced by the research will be of greater social use if researchers position themselves as {\textquoteleft}cognitive activists{\textquoteright}. This is because, the article argues, the researcher needs to work in solidarity with social movements for socially just change in order to reconnect academic knowledge work to the wider struggles for social change. The article thinks through the implications and ideas around this framing of research work and positionality. It then goes on to examine in detail one of the techniques for taking this position – that of the mutually useful conversation frame of the research interview – exploring why this thinking came about and how this framing of the interview is politically necessary for the cognitiveactivism proposed.",
author = "Cassie Earl",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Power and Education, 9 (2), 2017, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Power and Education page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/pae on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/ ",
year = "2017",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1757743817714281",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "129--144",
journal = "Power & Education",
publisher = "Sage",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The researcher as cognitive activist and the mutually useful conversation

AU - Earl, Cassie

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Power and Education, 9 (2), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Power and Education page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/pae on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - This autoethnagraphic article argues that in the study of political education, especially learning through social movement activities, the knowledge produced by the research will be of greater social use if researchers position themselves as ‘cognitive activists’. This is because, the article argues, the researcher needs to work in solidarity with social movements for socially just change in order to reconnect academic knowledge work to the wider struggles for social change. The article thinks through the implications and ideas around this framing of research work and positionality. It then goes on to examine in detail one of the techniques for taking this position – that of the mutually useful conversation frame of the research interview – exploring why this thinking came about and how this framing of the interview is politically necessary for the cognitiveactivism proposed.

AB - This autoethnagraphic article argues that in the study of political education, especially learning through social movement activities, the knowledge produced by the research will be of greater social use if researchers position themselves as ‘cognitive activists’. This is because, the article argues, the researcher needs to work in solidarity with social movements for socially just change in order to reconnect academic knowledge work to the wider struggles for social change. The article thinks through the implications and ideas around this framing of research work and positionality. It then goes on to examine in detail one of the techniques for taking this position – that of the mutually useful conversation frame of the research interview – exploring why this thinking came about and how this framing of the interview is politically necessary for the cognitiveactivism proposed.

U2 - 10.1177/1757743817714281

DO - 10.1177/1757743817714281

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 129

EP - 144

JO - Power & Education

JF - Power & Education

IS - 2

ER -