Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Responsive Bystander

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The Responsive Bystander: How Social Group Membership and Group Size Can Encourage as Well as Inhibit Bystander Intervention

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Responsive Bystander: How Social Group Membership and Group Size Can Encourage as Well as Inhibit Bystander Intervention. / Levine, Mark; Crowther, Simon.
In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 95, No. 6, 01.12.2008, p. 1429-1439.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Levine M, Crowther S. The Responsive Bystander: How Social Group Membership and Group Size Can Encourage as Well as Inhibit Bystander Intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008 Dec 1;95(6):1429-1439. doi: 10.1037/a0012634

Author

Levine, Mark ; Crowther, Simon. / The Responsive Bystander : How Social Group Membership and Group Size Can Encourage as Well as Inhibit Bystander Intervention. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008 ; Vol. 95, No. 6. pp. 1429-1439.

Bibtex

@article{c2513708feac4cda867f0a2ef15d0981,
title = "The Responsive Bystander: How Social Group Membership and Group Size Can Encourage as Well as Inhibit Bystander Intervention",
abstract = "Four experiments explored the interaction of group size, social categorization, and bystander behavior. In Study 1, increasing group size inhibited intervention in a street violence scenario when bystanders were strangers but encouraged intervention when bystanders were friends. Study 2 replicated and extended these findings to social category members. When gender identity was salient, group size encouraged intervention when bystanders and victim shared social category membership. In addition, group size interacted with context-specific norms that both inhibit and encourage helping. Study 3 used physical co-presence and gender identities to examine these social category effects. Increasing group size of women produced greater helping of a female victim, but increasing group size of men did not. Additionally, increasing numbers of out-group bystanders resulted in less intervention from women but more intervention from men. Study 4 replicated these findings with a measure of real-life helping behavior. Taken together, the findings indicate that the bystander effect is not a generic consequence of increasing group size. When bystanders share group-level psychological relationships, group size can encourage as well as inhibit helping.",
keywords = "bystanders, group size, helping, identity, social groups",
author = "Mark Levine and Simon Crowther",
year = "2008",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0012634",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "1429--1439",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Responsive Bystander

T2 - How Social Group Membership and Group Size Can Encourage as Well as Inhibit Bystander Intervention

AU - Levine, Mark

AU - Crowther, Simon

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Four experiments explored the interaction of group size, social categorization, and bystander behavior. In Study 1, increasing group size inhibited intervention in a street violence scenario when bystanders were strangers but encouraged intervention when bystanders were friends. Study 2 replicated and extended these findings to social category members. When gender identity was salient, group size encouraged intervention when bystanders and victim shared social category membership. In addition, group size interacted with context-specific norms that both inhibit and encourage helping. Study 3 used physical co-presence and gender identities to examine these social category effects. Increasing group size of women produced greater helping of a female victim, but increasing group size of men did not. Additionally, increasing numbers of out-group bystanders resulted in less intervention from women but more intervention from men. Study 4 replicated these findings with a measure of real-life helping behavior. Taken together, the findings indicate that the bystander effect is not a generic consequence of increasing group size. When bystanders share group-level psychological relationships, group size can encourage as well as inhibit helping.

AB - Four experiments explored the interaction of group size, social categorization, and bystander behavior. In Study 1, increasing group size inhibited intervention in a street violence scenario when bystanders were strangers but encouraged intervention when bystanders were friends. Study 2 replicated and extended these findings to social category members. When gender identity was salient, group size encouraged intervention when bystanders and victim shared social category membership. In addition, group size interacted with context-specific norms that both inhibit and encourage helping. Study 3 used physical co-presence and gender identities to examine these social category effects. Increasing group size of women produced greater helping of a female victim, but increasing group size of men did not. Additionally, increasing numbers of out-group bystanders resulted in less intervention from women but more intervention from men. Study 4 replicated these findings with a measure of real-life helping behavior. Taken together, the findings indicate that the bystander effect is not a generic consequence of increasing group size. When bystanders share group-level psychological relationships, group size can encourage as well as inhibit helping.

KW - bystanders

KW - group size

KW - helping

KW - identity

KW - social groups

U2 - 10.1037/a0012634

DO - 10.1037/a0012634

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 19025293

AN - SCOPUS:57949115667

VL - 95

SP - 1429

EP - 1439

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 6

ER -