Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The rights of the child in the case law of the ...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The rights of the child in the case law of the inter-American court of human rights : recent cases.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

The rights of the child in the case law of the inter-American court of human rights : recent cases. / Butler, Israel de Jesús.
In: Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2005, p. 151-167.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Butler, IDJ 2005, 'The rights of the child in the case law of the inter-American court of human rights : recent cases.', Human Rights Law Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlrev/ngi007

APA

Butler, I. D. J. (2005). The rights of the child in the case law of the inter-American court of human rights : recent cases. Human Rights Law Review, 5(1), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlrev/ngi007

Vancouver

Butler IDJ. The rights of the child in the case law of the inter-American court of human rights : recent cases. Human Rights Law Review. 2005;5(1):151-167. doi: 10.1093/hrlrev/ngi007

Author

Butler, Israel de Jesús. / The rights of the child in the case law of the inter-American court of human rights : recent cases. In: Human Rights Law Review. 2005 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 151-167.

Bibtex

@article{568c90884bbe42a69cb1f6196f9dff0c,
title = "The rights of the child in the case law of the inter-American court of human rights : recent cases.",
abstract = "The present commentary considers two cases decided in 2004 by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (the Court) concerning the rights of the child as protected by Article 19 of the American Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).1 In the first of these cases the Court takes a nuanced approach to Article 19, incorporating its requirements into the other substantive rights of the Convention rather than examining it in isolation. In the second case the Court considers the torture and extrajudicial execution of two minors during an anti-terrorism campaign in Peru in 1991. This judgment reinforces the State's obligation to respect human rights even when combating terrorism, which is pertinent given the current global {\textquoteleft}war{\textquoteright} on terror.",
author = "Butler, {Israel de Jes{\'u}s}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1093/hrlrev/ngi007",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "151--167",
journal = "Human Rights Law Review",
issn = "1744-1021",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rights of the child in the case law of the inter-American court of human rights : recent cases.

AU - Butler, Israel de Jesús

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The present commentary considers two cases decided in 2004 by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (the Court) concerning the rights of the child as protected by Article 19 of the American Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).1 In the first of these cases the Court takes a nuanced approach to Article 19, incorporating its requirements into the other substantive rights of the Convention rather than examining it in isolation. In the second case the Court considers the torture and extrajudicial execution of two minors during an anti-terrorism campaign in Peru in 1991. This judgment reinforces the State's obligation to respect human rights even when combating terrorism, which is pertinent given the current global ‘war’ on terror.

AB - The present commentary considers two cases decided in 2004 by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (the Court) concerning the rights of the child as protected by Article 19 of the American Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).1 In the first of these cases the Court takes a nuanced approach to Article 19, incorporating its requirements into the other substantive rights of the Convention rather than examining it in isolation. In the second case the Court considers the torture and extrajudicial execution of two minors during an anti-terrorism campaign in Peru in 1991. This judgment reinforces the State's obligation to respect human rights even when combating terrorism, which is pertinent given the current global ‘war’ on terror.

U2 - 10.1093/hrlrev/ngi007

DO - 10.1093/hrlrev/ngi007

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 151

EP - 167

JO - Human Rights Law Review

JF - Human Rights Law Review

SN - 1744-1021

IS - 1

ER -