Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The safety of researchers and participants in p...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The safety of researchers and participants in primary care qualitative research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The safety of researchers and participants in primary care qualitative research. / Williamson, Andrea E.; Burns, Nicola.
In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 64, No. 621, 01.04.2014, p. 198-200.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Williamson, AE & Burns, N 2014, 'The safety of researchers and participants in primary care qualitative research', British Journal of General Practice, vol. 64, no. 621, pp. 198-200. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X679480

APA

Williamson, A. E., & Burns, N. (2014). The safety of researchers and participants in primary care qualitative research. British Journal of General Practice, 64(621), 198-200. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X679480

Vancouver

Williamson AE, Burns N. The safety of researchers and participants in primary care qualitative research. British Journal of General Practice. 2014 Apr 1;64(621):198-200. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X679480

Author

Williamson, Andrea E. ; Burns, Nicola. / The safety of researchers and participants in primary care qualitative research. In: British Journal of General Practice. 2014 ; Vol. 64, No. 621. pp. 198-200.

Bibtex

@article{b2b8ae92b4d247a587d09d9670892427,
title = "The safety of researchers and participants in primary care qualitative research",
abstract = "Since the 1990s qualitative research methods have become an intrinsic aspect of primary care research. They have provided insight into the complexity of healthcare professionals? and patients? perspectives on health and health care, utilising a range of methods including interviews, observations, and focus groups.1 These methods require flexibility on the part of the researcher and participant in relation to time, location, and what they share of themselves. It is our view that although primary care research employs rigour when considering which method and analytical approach best fits the research context, there remains a relative neglect of the stance of the researcher and research participant relationships in the design and conduct of primary care studies. Research encounters may provide an encouraging space for individuals to discuss feelings and views. The sharing of such information can likewise be a profound and moving experience for researchers who may encounter emotions inside themselves and others ? feelings which may be challenging. Yet little has been said about emotions in primary care research. How should one deal with these? Similarly, while physical safety for participants is explicitly considered during study design and ethical review, qualitative research takes place outside a lab-based environment and requires researchers to consider their own safety too. This article discusses the emotional safety of participants and researchers and physical safety considerations for researchers by describing approaches we have used. We hope this will encourage debate within the primary care research community and by doing this will enhance research quality and enable clinicians and researchers to make more informed decisions about involving patients in qualitative research. ",
author = "Williamson, {Andrea E.} and Nicola Burns",
year = "2014",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3399/bjgp14X679480",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "198--200",
journal = "British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",
number = "621",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The safety of researchers and participants in primary care qualitative research

AU - Williamson, Andrea E.

AU - Burns, Nicola

PY - 2014/4/1

Y1 - 2014/4/1

N2 - Since the 1990s qualitative research methods have become an intrinsic aspect of primary care research. They have provided insight into the complexity of healthcare professionals? and patients? perspectives on health and health care, utilising a range of methods including interviews, observations, and focus groups.1 These methods require flexibility on the part of the researcher and participant in relation to time, location, and what they share of themselves. It is our view that although primary care research employs rigour when considering which method and analytical approach best fits the research context, there remains a relative neglect of the stance of the researcher and research participant relationships in the design and conduct of primary care studies. Research encounters may provide an encouraging space for individuals to discuss feelings and views. The sharing of such information can likewise be a profound and moving experience for researchers who may encounter emotions inside themselves and others ? feelings which may be challenging. Yet little has been said about emotions in primary care research. How should one deal with these? Similarly, while physical safety for participants is explicitly considered during study design and ethical review, qualitative research takes place outside a lab-based environment and requires researchers to consider their own safety too. This article discusses the emotional safety of participants and researchers and physical safety considerations for researchers by describing approaches we have used. We hope this will encourage debate within the primary care research community and by doing this will enhance research quality and enable clinicians and researchers to make more informed decisions about involving patients in qualitative research.

AB - Since the 1990s qualitative research methods have become an intrinsic aspect of primary care research. They have provided insight into the complexity of healthcare professionals? and patients? perspectives on health and health care, utilising a range of methods including interviews, observations, and focus groups.1 These methods require flexibility on the part of the researcher and participant in relation to time, location, and what they share of themselves. It is our view that although primary care research employs rigour when considering which method and analytical approach best fits the research context, there remains a relative neglect of the stance of the researcher and research participant relationships in the design and conduct of primary care studies. Research encounters may provide an encouraging space for individuals to discuss feelings and views. The sharing of such information can likewise be a profound and moving experience for researchers who may encounter emotions inside themselves and others ? feelings which may be challenging. Yet little has been said about emotions in primary care research. How should one deal with these? Similarly, while physical safety for participants is explicitly considered during study design and ethical review, qualitative research takes place outside a lab-based environment and requires researchers to consider their own safety too. This article discusses the emotional safety of participants and researchers and physical safety considerations for researchers by describing approaches we have used. We hope this will encourage debate within the primary care research community and by doing this will enhance research quality and enable clinicians and researchers to make more informed decisions about involving patients in qualitative research.

U2 - 10.3399/bjgp14X679480

DO - 10.3399/bjgp14X679480

M3 - Journal article

VL - 64

SP - 198

EP - 200

JO - British Journal of General Practice

JF - British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 621

ER -