Rights statement: “This article has been accepted for publication in Journal of Medical Ethics, 2023 following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-108908 © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Accepted author manuscript, 54.7 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Review article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Review article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The scope of patient, healthcare professional and healthcare systems responsibilities to reduce the carbon footprint of inhalers
T2 - a response to commentaries
AU - Parker, Joshua
N1 - “This article has been accepted for publication in Journal of Medical Ethics, 2023 following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-108908 © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2023/2/21
Y1 - 2023/2/21
N2 - I am grateful for these four wide-ranging and incisive commentaries on my paper discussing the ethical issues that arise when we consider the carbon footprint of inhalers.1 As I am unable to address every point raised, instead I focus on what I take to be the common thread running through these papers. Each response has something to say regarding the scope of healthcare's responsibility to mitigate climate change. This can be explored at the intuitional or structural level, or at the individual patient and practitioner level leading to a further issue of the relationship between these perspectives.
AB - I am grateful for these four wide-ranging and incisive commentaries on my paper discussing the ethical issues that arise when we consider the carbon footprint of inhalers.1 As I am unable to address every point raised, instead I focus on what I take to be the common thread running through these papers. Each response has something to say regarding the scope of healthcare's responsibility to mitigate climate change. This can be explored at the intuitional or structural level, or at the individual patient and practitioner level leading to a further issue of the relationship between these perspectives.
U2 - 10.1136/jme-2023-108908
DO - 10.1136/jme-2023-108908
M3 - Review article
VL - 49
SP - 1871
EP - 1888
JO - Journal of Medical Ethics
JF - Journal of Medical Ethics
SN - 0306-6800
IS - 3
ER -