Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus. / Walker, Peter; Powell, D. J. .
In: Vision Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, 03.1979, p. 247-249.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Walker, P & Powell, DJ 1979, 'The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus', Vision Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 247-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(79)90169-X

APA

Walker, P., & Powell, D. J. (1979). The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus. Vision Research, 19(3), 247-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(79)90169-X

Vancouver

Walker P, Powell DJ. The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus. Vision Research. 1979 Mar;19(3):247-249. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90169-X

Author

Walker, Peter ; Powell, D. J. . / The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus. In: Vision Research. 1979 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 247-249.

Bibtex

@article{14a64dbcaf7a45aaa304f3aa145b411b,
title = "The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus",
abstract = "The nature of rivalry suppression was investigated by examining the effects of changing one of the rivalling stimuli at the beginning of its phases of suppression. The stimulus was an obliquelyoriented grating whose phase, spatial frequency and contrast could be changed without altering its mean luminance. Such changes were found to disturb the course of rivalry and, more specifically, to cause the reappearance of the stimulus within 20 msec. Suppression is thus shown to be selective and not to render the subject insensitive to all classes of stimulus change.",
author = "Peter Walker and Powell, {D. J.}",
year = "1979",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/0042-6989(79)90169-X",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "247--249",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus

AU - Walker, Peter

AU - Powell, D. J.

PY - 1979/3

Y1 - 1979/3

N2 - The nature of rivalry suppression was investigated by examining the effects of changing one of the rivalling stimuli at the beginning of its phases of suppression. The stimulus was an obliquelyoriented grating whose phase, spatial frequency and contrast could be changed without altering its mean luminance. Such changes were found to disturb the course of rivalry and, more specifically, to cause the reappearance of the stimulus within 20 msec. Suppression is thus shown to be selective and not to render the subject insensitive to all classes of stimulus change.

AB - The nature of rivalry suppression was investigated by examining the effects of changing one of the rivalling stimuli at the beginning of its phases of suppression. The stimulus was an obliquelyoriented grating whose phase, spatial frequency and contrast could be changed without altering its mean luminance. Such changes were found to disturb the course of rivalry and, more specifically, to cause the reappearance of the stimulus within 20 msec. Suppression is thus shown to be selective and not to render the subject insensitive to all classes of stimulus change.

U2 - 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90169-X

DO - 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90169-X

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 247

EP - 249

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 3

ER -